Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T13:48:55.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Kinetics of TiSi2 Formation on Si(100) and Si(111)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

C. A. Pico
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
N. C. Tran
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
J. R. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
M. G. Lagally
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Get access

Abstract

Refractory-metal silicides are currently receiving widespread attention because of their usefulness as interconnects in VLSI devices. Potentially the most important of these silicides is TiSi2. TiSi2 offers a sharp stable interface, a high process-compatible eutectic temperature, and the lowest resistivity of all refractory-metal silicides. Much of the previous work on TiSi2 [1-8] has been directed towards the understanding of the kinetics of silicide formation in order to optimize these electrical and interfacial properties. One parameter that may affect the silicide formation is substrate orientation [9]. We have compared the kinetics of formation of TiSi2 for Ti deposited onto p-type 10Ω-cm Si(100) and Si(111). All process parameters except substrate orientation were identical. 2800Å of Ti was electron-beam evaporated at a rate of 20Å/s and a background pressure of 9×10−8 torr onto chemically cleaned (HNO3, HF, rinse) Si substrates and subsequently annealed at temperatures between 470°C and 700°C in evacuated sealed quartz tubes. A turbopumped vacuum system was used to evacuate the quartz tube before sealing. A Ti getter was independently heated to remove remaining background contaminants prior to annealing.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Finstad, T. G. and Nicolet, M. A., Thin Solid Films 68, 393 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bentini, G. G., Nipoti, R., Armigliato, A., Bertin, M., Drigo, A. V., and Cohen, C., J. Appl. Phys. 57, 270 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Hung, L. S., Gyulai, J., Mayer, J. W., Lau, S. S., and Nicolet, M. A., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 5076 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Houtum, H. J.TW. von and Raaijmakers, I. J. M., presented at MRS 1985 Fall Meeting, Boston, MA, 1985 (to be published).Google Scholar
5. Revesz, P., Gyimesi, J., Pogany, L., and Peto, G., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 2114 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Guldan, A., Schiller, V., Steffen, A., and Balk, P., Thin Solid Films 100, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Maa, J.-S., Lin, C.-J., Liu, J.-H., and Liu, Y.-C., Thin Solid Films 64, 439 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Murarka, S. P. and Fraser, D. B., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 342 (1980).Google Scholar
9. d'Heurle, F. M. and Gas, P., J. Mater. Res. 1, 206(1986).Google Scholar
10. Aumann, C. E., Jacobs, J. R., Phipps, M. S., Pico, C., Tran, N. C., and Lagally, M. G., in 1985 Proc. Second Int'l IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conf., (IEEE, New York, 1985), p. 363379.Google Scholar