Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:10:16.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Ge1-x-ySixSny Ternary Alloy Surfaces and Ni/Ge1-x-ySixSny Bilayer Reactions by X-Ray Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Gordon J. Grzybowski ,
Arnold Kiefer  and
Bruce Claflin
Gordon J. Grzybowski
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Sensors Directorate, Wright–Patterson AFB, OH 45433, U.S.A. Solid State Scientific Corporation. Hollis, NH 03049, U.S.A.
Arnold Kiefer
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Sensors Directorate, Wright–Patterson AFB, OH 45433, U.S.A.
Bruce Claflin
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Sensors Directorate, Wright–Patterson AFB, OH 45433, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Interest in next generation devices that integrate photonic and electronic functionality is focused on extending the capability of existing group IV material systems while maintaining compatibility with existing processing methods and procedures. One such class of materials which has been recently developed, Ge1-x-ySixSny ternary alloys, is being investigated for integrated Si photonics, solar cell materials, telecommunication applications, and for IR photodetectors. These alloys afford the opportunity to decouple the band gap energies and lattice constants over a wide range of values, potentially yielding direct and indirect character that can be coupled with a variety of different substrates dependent on composition.

In the present work, we report X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization of Ge1-x-ySixSny alloys grown by gas-source molecular beam epitaxy (GS-MBE) and investigate Ni- Ge1-x-ySiySny bilayer reactions with x-ray diffraction (XRD). The surface oxidation of samples stored in ambient conditions were measured with XPS. High resolution spectra showed chemical shifts of Ge, Si and Sn peaks consistent with Ge-O, Si-O and Sn-O bond formation. Depth profiling indicates a homogeneous composition throughout the bulk of the sample with surface oxidation confined to the top few nanometers. A highly tin-enriched layer was indicated at the surface of the material, while silicon was observed to be either enriched or depleted at the surface depending on the sample.

To study the interaction of the ternary with an ohmic contact commonly used in device fabrication processes today, nickel layers 30 nm thick were evaporated onto the alloys and were annealed in nitrogen up to 400 °C for periods as long as 1 hour. The XRD data show that the Ni2(Ge1-x-ySixSny) phase forms first followed by Ni(Ge1-x-ySixSny).

Keywords

Gex-ray diffraction (XRD)Ni
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1770: Symposium A – Emerging Silicon Science and Technology , 2015 , pp. 19 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

D’Costa, V. R., Fang, Y.-Y., Tolle, J., Kouvetakis, J., and Menendez, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107403 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. W. and Dow, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 36, 7994 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moontragoon, P., Soref, R. A. and Ikonic, Z., J. Appl. Phys. 112, 073106 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. D., Xu, C., Jiang, L., Kouvetakis, J., and Menendez, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 202104 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouvetakis, J., Menedez, J., Chizmeshya, A.V. G., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 36, 497 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soref, R., Nat. Photonics 4, 495 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Y.-Y., Xie, J., Tolle, J., Roucka, R., D’Costa, V. R., Chizmeshya, A. V. G., Menendez, J., and Kouvetakis, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16095 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, G., Soref, R. A., and Cheng, H. H., J. Appl. Phys. 108, 033107 (2010).Google Scholar
Sun, G., Cheng, H. H., Menendez, J., Khurgin, J. B., and Soref, R. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 251105 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, L. J. et al. , Thin Solid Films 151, 462 (2004).Google Scholar
Marshall, E. D., Wu, C.S., Pai, C.S., Scott, M.S., Lau, S. S., Mater. Res. Society symp. Proc. 47, 161 (1985).Google Scholar
Gaudet, S., Datavernier, C., Lavoie, C., Desjardins, P., J. Appl. Phys. 100, 034306 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H., Chen, R., Lu, W., Huo, Y., Kamins, T. I., and Harris, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 141908 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. H., Toh, E.-H., Wang, X., Tripathy, S., Osipowicz, T., Chan, T. K., Hoe, K.-M., Balakumar, S., Lo, G.-Q., Samudra, G., and Yeo, Y.-C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 202105 (2007).Google Scholar
Moulder, J. F. et al. , Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN (1992).Google Scholar
Schubert, K., Pfisterer, H., Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde, 41, 358–367, (1950).Google Scholar
Schubert, K., Goedecke, T., Ellner, M.,Journal of the Less-Common Metals, 24, 23–40, (1971).Google Scholar