Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:22:28.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Misorientation Dependence of the Fracture Behavior of F.C.C. Metal Bicrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jian-Sheng Wang
Jian-Sheng Wang*
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Get access

Abstract

The ductile versus brittle response of Cu bicrystal interfaces with different misorientations and Bi segregation levels has been investigated. The fracture behavior of the bicrystals and the morphology of the fracture surfaces depends on the type of the interface and the amount of impurity segregation. The different fracture behaviors of the bicrystals can to some extent be understood by considering the difference in grain boundary structure and comparing the theoretically predicted values of crack tip energy release rates for dislocation emission from the crack tip versus for cleavage decohesion of the grain boundary. However, the effects of Bi segregation in inducing embrittlement seem greater than can currently be rationalized by such a concept and, also, there is evidence that fracture surfaces may not always coincide, microscopically, with the interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 122: Symposium I – Interfacial Structure, Properties, and Design , 1988 , 367
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]. Russell, J. D. and Winter, A. T., Scripta Metall. 19, 575 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]. Kumar, A. and Eyre, B. L., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 370, 431 (1980).Google Scholar
[3]. Watanabe, T., J. de Phys. 46, C4–555 (1985).Google Scholar
[4]. Fraczkiewicz, A. and Biscondi, M., J. de Phys. 46, C4–497 (1985).Google Scholar
[5]. Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]. Briant, C. L. and Messmer, R. P., J. de Phys. 43, C6–255 (1982).Google Scholar
[7]. Schulson, E. M., Weihs, T. P., Baker, I., Frost, H. J. and Horton, J. A., Scripta Metall. 19, 1492 (1985).Google Scholar
[8]. Bond, G. M., Robertson, I. M. and Bimbaum, H. K., J. Mater. Res. 2, 436 (1987).Google Scholar
[9]. Anderson, P. M., Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, (1986).Google Scholar
[10]. Anderson, P. M. and Rice, J. R., Scripta Metall. 20, 1467 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]. Wang, J. S., Anderson, P. M. and Rice, J. R., in Mechanical Behaviour of Materials-V, edited by Yan, M. G., Zhang, S. H. and Zheng, Z. M. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987) pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
[12]. Wolf, D., in Electronic Packaging Materials Science, edited by Giess, E. A., Tu, K-N. and Uhlmann, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 40, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 341–347.Google Scholar
[13]. Wang, J. S., J. Mater. Res. 3, 16 (1988).Google Scholar
[14]. Frost, H. J., Ashby, M. F. and Spaepen, F., A Catalogue of [1001. r1001. and 111 Symmetric Tilt Boundaries in Face-Centered Cubic Hard Sphere Crystals. Harvard University Research Report, Harvard University (1982).Google Scholar
[15]. Argon, A. S., Acta Metall. 35, 185 (1987).Google Scholar
[16]. Clarke, D. (private communication).Google Scholar
[17]. Ogura, T., Watanabe, T., Karashima, S. and Masumoto, T., Acta Metall. 35, 1807 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]. Ogura, T., McMahon, C. J. Jr., Feng, H. C. and Vitek, V., Acta Metall., 26, 1317 (1978).Google Scholar
[19]. Tatsumi, K., Okumura, N. and Funaki, S., in Grain Boundary Structure and Related Phenomena, Proc. of JIMIS-4 (1986). pp. 427–434.Google Scholar
[20]. Suzuki, S., Abiko, K. and Kimura, H., Scripta Metall. 15, 1139 (1981).Google Scholar
[21]. Gleiter, H., Acta Metall. 18, 117 (1970).Google Scholar
[22]. Paidar, V., Physica Status Solidi (a) 92, 115 (1985).Google Scholar
[23]. Bouchet, D. and Priester, L., Scripta Metall. 20, 961 (1986).Google Scholar
[24]. Bouchet, D. and Priester, L., Scripta Metall. 21, 475 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]. Paidar, V., Acta Metall. 35, 2035 (1987).Google Scholar