Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:59:04.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving the Near-Field Transmission Efficiency of Nano-Optical Transducers by Tailoring the Near-Field Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Kursat Sendur  and
William Challener
Kursat Sendur
Affiliation:
[email protected], Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey
William Challener
Affiliation:
n/a@n/a.n/a, Seagate Technology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Get access

Abstract

Despite research efforts to find a better nano-optical transducer for light localization and high transmission efficiency for existing and emerging plasmonic applications, there has not been much consideration on improving the near-field optical performance of the system by engineering the near-field sample. In this work, we demonstrate the impact of tailoring the near-field sample by studying an emerging plasmonic application, namely heat-assisted magnetic recording. Basic principles of Maxwell's and heat transfer equations are utilized to obtain a magnetic medium with superior optical and thermal performance compared to a conventional magnetic medium.

Keywords

magnetoopticopticalmemory
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1182: Symposium EE – Materials for Nanophotonics–Plasmonics, Metamaterials and Light Localization , 2009 , 1182-EE13-41
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 de, F. J. G. Abajo, Opt. Express 10, 1475 (2002).Google Scholar
2 Grober, R. D., Schoelkopf, R. J., and Prober, D. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1354 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Shi, X. and Hesselink, L., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1632 (2001).Google Scholar
4 Hartschuh, A., Sánchez, E. J., Xie, X. S., Novotny, L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 095503 (2003).Google Scholar
5 McDaniel, T., Challener, W., and Sendur, K., IEEE Trans. Mag. 39, 1972 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Rottmayer, R. et al., IEEE Trans. Mag. 42, 2417 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Sendur, K., Challener, W., and Peng, C., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 2743 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Challener, W. et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 6632–6642 (2006).Google Scholar
9 Jin, J. M., The finite element method in electromagnetics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2000).Google Scholar
10All the FEM calculations in this report are performed with software from Ansoft Inc. and Ansys Inc.Google Scholar
11 Hao, F. et al., Phys. Rev. B 76, 245417 (2007).Google Scholar
12 Brandl, D. W. et al., Chem. Phys. 123, 024701 (2005).Google Scholar