Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T06:27:34.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Arsenic Deactivation on Arsenic-Implant Induced Enhanced Diffusion in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

O. Dokumaci ,
M.E. Law ,
V. Krishnamoorthy  and
K.S. Jones
O. Dokumaci
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Florida, 339 Larsen Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611
M.E. Law
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Florida, 339 Larsen Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611
V. Krishnamoorthy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
K.S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

The enhanced diffusion of boron due to high dose arsenic implantation into silicon is studied as a function of arsenic dose. The behavior of both the type-V and end-of-range loops is investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The role of arsenic deactivation induced interstitials and type-V loops on enhanced diffusion is assessed. Reduction of the boron diffusivity is observed with increasing arsenic dose at three different temperatures. The possible explanations for this reduction are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 396: Symposium A – Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing , 1995 , 167
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rousseau, P.M., Griffin, P.B. and Plummer, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 578 (1994).Google Scholar
2 Dokumaci, O., Rousseau, P., Luning, S., Krishnamoorthy, V., Jones, K.S. and Law, M.E., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 828 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Fair, R.B., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 35, 285 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Solmi, S., Baruffaldi, E and Canteri, R., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2135 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Sedgwick, T.O., Michel, A.E., Deline, V.R., Cohen, S.A. and Lasky, J.B., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 1452 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Solmi, S., Cembali, F., Fabbri, R., Servidori, M. and Canted, R., Appl. Phys. A 48, 255 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Cerva, H. and Hobler, G., J. Electrochem Soc. 139, 3631 (1992).Google Scholar
8 Cowern, N.E.B., Janssen, K.T.F. and Jos, H.F.F., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6191 (1990).Google Scholar
9 Luning, S., Rousseau, P.M., Griffin, P.B., Carey, P.G. and Plummer, J.D., International Electron Devices Meeting, p.457 (1992).Google Scholar