Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T05:01:37.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3D Quantitative Characterization of Local Structure and Properties of Contact Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Alexandra Velichko ,
Michael Engstler ,
Christian Selzner  and
Frank Mücklich
Alexandra Velichko
Affiliation:
[email protected], functional materials, materials science and engineering, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Michael Engstler
Affiliation:
[email protected], functional materials, materials science and engineering, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Christian Selzner
Affiliation:
[email protected], functional materials, materials science and engineering, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Frank Mücklich
Affiliation:
[email protected], functional materials, materials science and engineering, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The characterization of spatial distribution of different phases in materials provides understanding of structural influence on the properties and allows making physically well-grounded correlations. The FIB/SEM nanotomography opens new possibilities for the target microstructure characterization on the scales from 10 nm to 100 μm. It is based on the automatic serial sectioning by the focused ion beam (FIB). Scanning electron microscope in high resolution mode can be used for the imaging of nanostructured materials. Afterwards a detailed three dimensional (3D) image analysis enables the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of local microstructure. The possibilities of these techniques will be presented on the example of silver-composite contact materials which were analyzed using FIB nanotomography before and after exposure to plasma discharge. Significant changes in the spatial distribution of the oxide particles within the switched zone induce among other effects the changes in the local electric and thermal properties. These cause eventually the failure of the contact material. Advanced methods of image analysis allow characterization of inhomogeneous distribution of oxide particles in silver contact materials. Quantitative parameters characterizing the agglomeration of oxide inclusions and accumulation of pores can be derived from the results of distance transformations and morphological operations. The additional consideration of the connectivity allows the quantification of homogeneous and inhomogeneous states with high sensitivity and confidence level. Local thermal and electrical properties were estimated using simulation software on the real tomographic data. The combination of FIB microstructure tomography with modern 3D analysis and simulation techniques provides new prospects for targeted characterization and thus understanding of the microstructure formation and local effect associated with e.g. electro-erosion phenomena [1], [2]. First correlations between 3D microstructure parameters and resulting properties will be discussed.

Keywords

electrical propertiesnanostructureAg
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1184: Symposium GG – Electron Crystallography for Materials Research and Quantitive Characterization of Nanostructured Materials , 2009 , 1184-HH02-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Jeanvoine, N., et al. Pract. Metallography. 2006, Vol. 43, pp. 107–119.Google Scholar
[2] Soldera, F., et al. Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2007, Vol. 13, 3, pp. 422–423.Google Scholar
[3] Lasagni, F., et al. Adv. Eng. Mat. 2008, Vol. 10, pp. 62–66.Google Scholar
[4] Konrad, J., Zaefferer, S. and Raabe, D. Acta Mater. 2006, Vol. 54, 5, pp. 1369–1380.Google Scholar
[5] Ohser, J. and Mücklich, F. Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science. s.l.: John Willey & Sons, 2000.Google Scholar
[6] Ohser, J., Nagel, W. and Schladitz, K. Image Anal. Stereol. 2003, Vol. 22, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
[7] Velichko, A., et al. Acta Mater. 2008, Vol. 56, pp. 1981–1990.Google Scholar
[8] Wiegmann, A. and Zemitis, A. EJ-HEAT, Bericht des Fraunhofer ITWM, Nr. 94, 2006.Google Scholar
[9] Velichko, A. and Mücklich, F. Pract. Metallography. 2008, Vol. 45, pp. 423–439.Google Scholar
[10] Weber, L, Dorn, J. and Mortensen, A. Acta Mater. 2003, Vol. 51, pp. 3199–3211.Google Scholar