Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:46:32.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subsurface Processing of Electronic Materials Assisted by Atomic Displacements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

In the early years of doping of semiconductors by ion implantation, atomic displacements and residual lattice damage were considered undesirable byproducts of an otherwise controllable doping process. Steps were taken to minimize disorder during implantation and/or to remove it as completely as possible during a subsequent annealing process. In many cases, such as boron- or phosphorus-implanted silicon, annealing temperatures exceeding 900°C were necessary to achieve the desirable electrical properties. Indeed, removal of implantation damage remains a crucial issue, particularly as device dimensions shrink and the need has arisen for substantially lower processing temperatures. The advent of high-energy (MeV) implantation in specific processing steps and the increasing use of more complex (often multilayer) compound semiconductors has added further to the need to understand and control ion damage and its annealing in semiconductors.

Over the past decade, there has been a growing realization that implantation induced atomic displacements and defects can have significant advantages in processing. For example, it was realized early that ion damage, and resultant defect fluxes to and from lattice disruptions, can “getter” and trap undesirable impurities that would otherwise interfere with device operation. More recently, it has been possible to use ion beams to tailor damage structures and form amorphous-crystalline superlattices, to remove pre-existing damage and induce crystallization of amorphous layers at very low temperatures, to form ultrapure amorphous silicon for studying thermodynamic properties of this phase, or to mix films with semiconductors and form stable compounds such as silicides. Indeed, ion damage has been used to electrically isolate devices, to form optical waveguides and cavities, and to improve the junction properties of deeply doped layers. These issues are briefly reviewed in this article.

Type
Ion-Assisted Processing of Electronic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dearnaley, G., Freeman, J.H., Nelson, R.S., and Stephen, J., Ion Implantation, (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1973.Google Scholar
2.Cheung, N.W., Liang, C.L., Liew, B.K., Mutikainen, R.H., and Wong, H., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B37/38 (1989) p. 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Pearton, S.J., Mater. Sci. Reports 4 (1990) p. 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Buck, T.M., Pickar, K.A., Poate, J.M., and Hsieh, C.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 21 (1992) p. 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Vos, M., Wu, C., Mitchell, I.V., Jackman, T.E., Baribeau, J.M., and McCaffrey, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Eaglesham, D.J., Poate, J.M., Jacobson, D.C., Cerullo, M., Pfeiffer, L.M., and West, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Schreutelkamp, R.J., Custer, J.S., Leifting, J.R., Lu, W.X., and Saris, F.W, Mater. Sci. Rep. 6 (1991) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Williams, J.S., Elliman, R.G., Brown, W.L., and Seidel, T.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) p. 1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Poate, J.M.et.al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B55 (1991) p. 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hung, L.S., Hong, Q.Z., and Mayer, J.W., Nucl Instrum. Methods B37, 38 (1989) p. 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Bryan, R.P., Coleman, J.J., Miller, L.M., Givens, M.E., Averback, R.S., and Klatt, J.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 (1989) p. 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Schreutelkamp, R.J., Custer, J.S., Liefting, J.R., and Saris, F.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 2827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Williams, J.S., Short, K.T., Elliman, R.G., Ridgway, M.C., and Goldberg, R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B48 (1990) p. 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. See, for example, Jones, K.S., Prussin, S., and Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A45 (1988) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Elliman, R.G., Linnros, J., and Brown, W.L., in Fundamentals of Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing, edited by Aziz, M.J., Rehn, L.E., and Stritzker, B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 100, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) p. 863.Google Scholar
16.Linnros, J., Elliman, R.G., and Brown, W.L., J. Mater. Res. 6 (1988) p. 1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Schultz, P., Jagadish, C., Ridgway, M.C., Elliman, R.G., and Williams, J.S., Phys. Rev. B44 (1991) p. 9118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Elliman, R.G., Williams, J.S., Brown, W.L., Leiberich, A., Maher, D.A., and Knoell, R.V., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B19/20 (1987) p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Holland, O.W., Fathy, D., Narayan, J., and Oen, O.S., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B10/11 (1985) p. 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Beanland, D.G., in Ion Implantation and Beam Processing, Chapter 8, edited by Williams, J.S. and Poate, J.M. (Academic Press, Sydney, 1983).Google Scholar
21.Jones, K.S. and Santana, C.J., J. Mater. Res. 6 (1991) p. 1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Wendler, E., Wesch, W., and Gotz, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B55 (1991) p. 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Cullis, A.G., Chew, N.G., Whitehouse, C.R., Jacobson, D.C., Poate, J.M., and Pearton, S.J.Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 (1989) p. 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Olson, G.L. and Roth, R.A., Mater. Sci. Rep. 3 (1988) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Priolo, F. and Rimini, E., Mater. Sci. Rep. 5 (1990) p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Jackson, K.A., J. Mater. Res. 3 (1988) p. 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Williams, J.S., Ridgway, M.C., Elliman, R.G., Davies, J.A., Johnson, S.T., and Palmer, G.R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B55 (1991) p. 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Priolo, F., Poate, J.M., Jacobson, D.C., Linnros, J., Batstone, J.L., and Campisano, S.U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) p. 1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Wang, Z.L., Zhang, B.U., Zhao, Q.T., Li, Q., Liefting, J.R., Schreutelkamp, R.J., and Saris, F.W., J. Appl. Phys. (in press, April 15, 1992).Google Scholar
30.Alwan, J.J., Honig, J., MFavaro, .E., Beernink, K.J., Klatt, J.L., Averback, R.S., Coleman, J.J., and Bryan, R.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 2058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Elliman, R.G., Ridgway, M.C., Jagadish, C., Pearton, S.J., Ren, F., Lothian, J., Fullowan, T.R., Katz, A., Abernathy, C.R., and Kopf, R.F., J. Appl. Phys. 71 (1992) p. 1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar