Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:48:29.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of LDMMs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The previous sections of this article described the synthesis, morphologies, and properties of a variety of low-density microcellular materials. This section discusses several of the analytical methods used and developed at the DOE laboratories to characterize these state-of-the-art materials.

In some LDMM applications, quantitative measurements of the material's average cell size and cell size distribution are desired. Indeed, the term “microcellular” has little meaning without such information. As seen throughout this article, however, most LDMMs do not have a readily defined cellular character. The more general problem is to quantify the spatial scale(s) of the foam. For this purpose it is necessary to define one or more “measures” of the spatial scale. The possibilities are many and include not only single numbers (e.g., cell size and cell size standard deviation, where “cell size” is meaningful) but also functional descriptions (e.g., correlation functions).

SEM provides direct images and, therefore, is the most popular technique for examining LDMM morphology. SEM, however, suffers from at least three limitations: (1) SEM examines only a very small volume of material, and thus is impractical for obtaining average morphological properties; (2) SEM requires that nonconductive LDMMs be coated, a process step that can alter the structure and introduce artifacts (particularly with delicate structures); and (3) SEM images are only two-dimensional projections of real three-dimensional structures.

Type
Technical Feature
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Underwood, S.E., Quantitative Stereology (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970).Google Scholar
2.Aubert, J.H., J. Cellular. Plastics 24 (1988) p. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Aubert, J.H. and Sylwester, A.P., submitted to J. Mater. Sci.Google Scholar
4.Hrubesh, L.W. and Alviso, C.T. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry III, edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 121, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) p. 703; Lawrence Livermore Report No. UCRL-53794, July, 1987.Google Scholar
5.Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., Cellular Solids - Structure and Properties (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
6.Hilyard, N.C., editor Mechanics of Cellular Plastics (Macmillan, New York 1982).Google Scholar
7.Meinecke, E.A. and Clark, R.C., Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Foams (Technomic, Westport, CT, 1973).Google Scholar
8.LeMay, J.D., Pekala, R.W., and Hrubesh, L.H., Pacific Polym. Preprints 1 (1989) p. 295.Google Scholar
9.LeMay, J.D., Tillotson, T.M., Hrubesh, L.W., Pekala, R.W. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., Ulrich, D.R., and Zelinski, B.J (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 321.Google Scholar
10.Pekala, R.W., Alviso, C.T., and LeMay, J.D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-102969, February 12, 1990, in press.Google Scholar
11.Christensen, R.M., J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids 34 (1986) p. 563; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-93443, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Christensen, R.M., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCID-21105, 1987.Google Scholar
13.Warren, W.E., Kraynik, A.M., Mechanics of Mater. 1(1) (1987) p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Warren, W.E., Kraynik, A.M., Proc. 11th Canadian Cong. Appl. Mech., Vol. 1 (Edmonton, Alberta, May 31, 1987) p. a46.Google Scholar
15.Warren, W.E., Kraynik, A.M., J. Appl. Mech. 110 (1988), p. 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar