Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:58:28.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinetic Pathways to Strain Relaxation in the Si-Ge System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

D.E. Jesson ,
K.M. Chen  and
S.J. Pennycook
Get access

Extract

The strain-induced transition of a planar film to a three-dimensional island morphology is presently a significant issue in the growth of semiconductor thin films. Strain-induced roughening can be problematic in the fabrication of coherently strained device structures where it is important to understand the early stages of the transition to avoid or suppress three-dimensional (3D) growth. On the other hand, the strain-driven transition is beneficial for the self-assembly of quantum dots where it is necessary to control the size distribution and self-organizing behavior of the islands. In both cases, it is clearly important to identify and understand the kinetic pathways to island formation. From a more basic perspective, the strain-induced transition of epitaxial films allows us to study in detail the interplay between elastic stresses and surface energy in a carefully controlled experimental environment. One would therefore hope that the lessons learned from model semiconductor systems will be of relevance to understanding related phenomena in other areas of materials science and physical metallurgy.

Ihe strain-induced two-dimensional (2D)-to-3D transition in the Si-Ge system is manifested by a rich variety of observed surface morphologies. In the case of pure Ge on Si(OO1), the 4% misfit strain induces the formation of so-called hut clusters with curious elongated shapes. Such islands form almost immediately after the deposition of a wetting layer. In the case of lower misfit alloys, a more gentle ripple morphology can result that develops far from the interface. A general trend in all of the experiments is the decreasing size of typical morphological features with increasing misfit stress. In this article, largely guided by our experimental results, we adopt a nucleation and growth description of the 2D-to-3D transition. This approach appears particularly well-suited to explaining the wide spectrum of morphological development present in the Si-Ge system.

Type
Heteroepitaxy and Strain
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , April 1996 , pp. 31 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mo, Y-W., Savage, D.E., Swartzentruber, B.S., and Lagally, M.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) p. 1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Pidduck, A.J., Robbins, D.J., Cullis, A.G., Leong, W.Y., and Pitt, A.M., Thin Solid Films 222 (1992) p. 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Tersoff, J. and LeGoues, F.K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) p. 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tersoff, J. and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) p. 2782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) p. 4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Leonard, D., Krishnanurthy, N., Reaves, C.M., Denbaars, S.P., and Petroff, P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (1993) p. 3203; Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) p. 11687; J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12 (1994) p. 1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Solomon, G.S., Trezza, J.A., and Harris, J.S., J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66 (1995) p. 991; ibid. p. 3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Priester, C. and Lannoo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Shchukin, V.A., Ledentsov, N.N., Kop'ev, P.S., and Bimberg, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) p. 2968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Eaglesham, D.J. and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) p. 1943; M. Krishnamurthy, J.S. Drucker, and J.A. Venables, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) p. 6461; A. Sakai and T. Tatsumi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1994) p. 4007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Spencer, B.J., Voorhees, P.W., and Davies, S.H., J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) p. 4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jesson, D.E., Chen, K.M., Pennycook, S.J., Thundat, T., and Warmack, R.J., Science 268 (1995) p. 1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jesson, D.E., Pennycook, S.J., Baribeau, J-M., and Houghton, D.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) p. 1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Li, J., Chiu, C-H, and Gao, H., in Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution, edited by Yalisove, S.M., Thompson, C.T., and Eaglesham, D.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 317, 1994) p. 303.Google Scholar
15.Jesson, D.E., Pennycook, S.J., Baribeau, J-M., and Houghton, D.C., Scanning Microscopy 8 (1994) p. 849.Google Scholar
16.Yang, W.H. and Srolovitz, D.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) p. 1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Spencer, B.J. and Meiron, D.I., Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (1994) p. 3629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chiu, C-H. and Gao, H., in Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution, edited by Yalisove, S.M., Thompson, C.T., and Eaglesham, D.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 317, 1994) p. 369.Google Scholar
19.Chiu, C-H. and Gao, H., Int. J. Solids Structures 30 (1993) p. 2983.Google Scholar
20.van der Merwe, J.H., J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1963) p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Rice, J.R. and Thompson, R., Philos. Mag. 29 (1974) p. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Rice, J.R., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40 (1992) p. 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Cullis, A.G., Pidduck, A.J., and Emeny, M.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) p. 2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Albrecht, M., Christiansen, S., Hansson, P.O., Michler, J., Strunk, H.P., and Bauser, E., Proc. R. Microscopy Soc., Oxford, edited by Cullis, A.G. and Hutchinson, J.L. (in press).Google Scholar
25.Tromp, R.M. and Reuter, M.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) p. 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Perovic, D.D., Houghton, D.C., Noel, J-P., and Rowell, N.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11 (1993) p. 889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar