Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:18:03.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art-and-Technology: Recent Efforts in Materials and Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

To avoid misinterpretation, the term “art-and-technology” should be hyphenated because we are looking at an integrated art form which developed, roughly, during the past 70 years (since Naum Gabo's virtual volume, Kinetic Construction, Berlin, 1920). Art-and-technology results from “incorporated” contributions of art, science, and technology or, better, from artists, scientists, and engineers (plus industry, business, government, etc.). Although art-and-technology has frequently been bad-mouthed or even pronouned “dead” by advocates and practitioners of pure art as well as science and technology, it is alive and well and enjoying more vitality, variety, and expansion than ever before. It is currently the only expanding field in the arts; it feeds vitally into technology and industry—most visibly in entertainment but it also provides stimulus beyond fun to areas of science and engineering where “art applications” have abounded since the advent of photography and its vast consequent uses in science.

We can claim an eloquent tradition for art-and-technology in ancient historic, cultural manifestations such as the Egyptian pyramids and their “environmental” scale or the Greek theater with its elaborate stage machines. We are aware of elements of that tradition when we observe contemporary art-and-technology such as sky and space art (Figures 1 and 2), computer-generated virtual reality, performance with medical inquiry and medical apparatus, and art concepts inspired by molecular biology (Figure 3). Emphasis of search—whether artistic/expressive, conceptual/philosophical, or inquisitive/scientific—depends on taste and motivation. However, Leonardo is an undisputed idol to both artists and scientists.

Type
Art and Technology
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. References to artists Naum Gabo and his brother Antoine Pevsner, along with much basic information on early phases of 20th century art and its pioneers, are to be found in the following books:Google Scholar
Burnham, Jack, Beyond Modern Sculpture (George Braziller, New York, NY, n.d.) preface, 1967.Google Scholar
Davis, Douglas, Art and the Future: A History/Prophecy of the Collaboration Between Science, Technology and Art (Praeger Publishers, New York, NY, 1973).Google Scholar
Popper, Frank, Introduction, Electra: L'électricité et l'electronique dans l'art aux XXe siècle (MAM, Paris, 1984).Google Scholar
A good, little-known survey: Ans van Berkum, Tom Blekkenhorst, Science * Art [sic] (Fentener van Vlissingen Fund, Utrecht, Holland, n.d.).Google Scholar
2.Heronis Alexandrini Opera, Vol. 1, edited by Schmidt, Wilhelm (B.G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1899).Google Scholar
Bieber, Margarete, The History of Greek and Roman Theatre (Princeton University Press) Princeton, NJ, 1961).Google Scholar
3. Illustrations accompanying this essay may serve to give an impression of the variety in current art-and-technology; some images, with captions, may not directly refer to the text.Google Scholar
4.Passuth, Krisztina, Moholy-Nagy (Thames & Hudson, New York, NY, 1985).Google Scholar
5.Stein, Donna M., Thomas Wilfred: Lumia - A Retrospective Exhibition (Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, 1971).Google Scholar
6. References in Benthall, Jonathan, Science and Technology in Art Today (Thames & Hudson, London, 1972).Google Scholar
7. References in Youngblood, Gene, Expanded Cinema, Introduction by Fuller, R. Buckminster (E.P. Dutton & Co., New York, NY, 1970).Google Scholar
8.Decker, Edith, Paik-Video (DuMont, Cologne, 1988).Google Scholar
Video-Skulptur retrospektiv und aktuell 1963-1989, edited by Herzogenrath, Wulf and Decker, Edith (DuMont, Cologne, 1989).Google Scholar
9.Bureaud, Annick, International Directory of Electronic Arts - Art and Technology (Kanal Guide, Paris, 19901991).Google Scholar
10.Ramljak, Suzanne, Klüver, Billy interview, in Sculpture, special issue on art and technology, May-June 1991, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11. Basic information on Rauschenberg, Robert and the context of 20th century art, in Arnason, H.H., History of Modern Art (Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY, n.d.).Google Scholar
12.Arnheim, Rudolfet al., Gyorgy Kcpes - Works in Review (Museum of Science, Boston, MA, 1975).Google Scholar
13.Centerbeam, edited by Piene, Otto and Goldring, Elizabeth (CAVS/MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
14.Burroughs, Williamet al., Takis-Magnetic Sculpture (Howard Wise, New York, NY, 1967).Google Scholar
15.Cook, Christopher C.et al., Harold Tovish: A Retrospective Exhibition 1948-1988 (Andover, MA, 1988).Google Scholar
16.Tsaibernetic Art of Tsai, Wen-Ying (National Museum of History and Taiwan Museum of Art, Taiwan, n.d.).Google Scholar
17.Edgerton, Harold E. and Killian, James R. Jr., Moments of Vision - The Stroboscopic Revolution in Photography (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London, n.d.).Google Scholar
18.Morrison, Philip, Ring of Truth: An Inquiry into how we know what we know (Random House, New York, NY, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Smith, Cyril, The Search for Structure: Selected Essays from Art, Science, and History (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
20.Piene, Otto, Burgess, Lowry, Goldring, Elizabeth, and Kracke, Bernd, SKY ART Conference '81 (CAVS/MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
21.Bureaud, Annick, see Reference 9.Google Scholar
22. An example of Alloway's, Lawrence writing: American Pop Art (Collier Books and Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, NY, 1974).Google Scholar
23. See Les Immatériaux, edited by Théofilakis, Elie (Centre Pompidou, Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
24.Nouvelles Technologies — Un art sans modèle?,” edited by Hillaire, Norbert, art-press special, Paris (1991).Google Scholar
25.Claus, Jürgen, ChippppKunst-Computer-Holgraphie-Kybernetik-Laser (Ullstein, Frankfurt-Berlin, 1985).Google Scholar
Das elektronische Bauhaus: Gestaltung mit Umwelt (Interform, Zürich-Osnabruck, 1987).Google Scholar
Elektronisches Gestalten in Kunst und Design (Rowohlt, Hamburg, 1991).Google Scholar
26.Brand, Stewart, The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT (Viking, New York, NY, 1987).Google Scholar
27. Earlier pieces and performances by Paik, in Hanhardt, Johnet al., Nam June Paik (Whitney Museum & W.W. Norton, New York, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
28.Burgess, Lowry, Burgess (Editions du Trecare, Saint-Laurent, Québec, 1987).Google Scholar
29.Soto, Silvia, El Projecto MicroVenus, Espacio Y Tempo (May 1991, Madrid).Google Scholar
30.LEONARDO, “Holography as an Art Medium,” 22 (3 and 4) 1989.Google Scholar
31.Glibota, Ante, Dieter Jung (Paris Art Center, Paris, 1989).Google Scholar
Piene, Ottoet al., Dieter Jung: Bilder-Zeichnungen-Hologramme (Wienand Verlag, Cologne, 1991).Google Scholar
32. LEONARDO, see Reference 30.Google Scholar
33. LEONARDO, see Reference 30.Google Scholar
34.Information in: Manfred Schneckenburger et al., Otto Piene und das CAVS (Deutscher Künstlerbund, Karlsruhe, 1988).Google Scholar
35. Information in: Galloway, David, Art ware-Kunst und Elektronik (Deutsche Messe AG and Siemens, Hannover, 1989).Google Scholar
36.GAS - Get Away Specials, small space shuttle payloads of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Washington, DC.The Last Getaway Specials: The Space Shuttle and the Artist, by Joe Davis, LEONARDO 24 (4) (1991).Google Scholar
37.Goldring, Elizabeth Olson, Laser Treatment: Poems and Two Stories (Blue Giant Press, Boston, MA, 1983).Google Scholar
Desert Sun/Desert Moon and the SKY ART Manifesto, LEONARDO 20 (4) 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Lyotard, Jean-Francois, Immaterialität (Berlin, 1985).Google Scholar
39. References in: Fargier, Jean-Paul, Piene, Otto, le degré zéro du nu, art press special, Paris, No. 12 (1991).Google Scholar
40.Ross, Philip, A Matter of Taste, (Scientific American, July 1991, New York, NY).Google Scholar
41. References in: Nadis, Steve, “Antimatter,” Omni (Jan. 1991, New York, NY). Artists' statements provided to the author for this essay.Google Scholar
42. National Nanofabrication Facility, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
43.MRS Bulletin XVI (4) (1991) p. 78, Figure 2.Google Scholar
44. See Reference 41.Google Scholar