Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:32:01.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermomechanical evaluation of new geopolymer binder from demolition waste and ignimbrite slits for application in the construction industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2019

D.L. Mayta-Ponce*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales-CITEM, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú.
P. Soto-Cruz
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales-CITEM, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú.
F.A. Huamán-Mamani
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales-CITEM, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú.
*
Get access

Abstract

Geopolymeric mortars with volumetric fractions of 0.6:1:0.3 for a binder powder, fine sand and sodium hydroxide solution (12M), respectively; have been fabricated by mixing the solid materials and the subsequent addition of sodium hydroxide solution 12M to form a workable paste, to later be cured for 28 days at room temperature. The microstructures of the fabricated materials reveal the existence of two phases with notable difference, one continuous to the geopolymer binder phase and another discontinuous of fine sand particles agglutinated by the binder phase. Mechanical compression tests are performed at a constant compression rate of 0.05 mm/min and at temperatures ranged from room temperature to 500°C. The mechanical results are ranged from 19 and 69 MPa for all the materials studied. On the other hand, there was an increase in mechanical resistance up to test temperatures of 200°C and the progressive reduction of resistance at temperatures above 200°C, with a fragile-ductile transition zone between 400 and 500°C and completely ductile behavior from test temperatures of 500°C.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmari, S, Ren, X, Toufigh, V, Zhang, L. Production of geopolymer binder from blended waste concrete powder and fly ash. Constr Build Master 2012; 35: 718-729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H, Lim, M, Choi, H, Kitagaki, R, Noguchi, T. Using microwave heating to completely recycle concrete. J Environ Prot 2014; 5: 583-596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, D, Sivakumar, V, Bell, A, McLaverty, G. Shear strength of recycled construction materials intended for use in vibro ground improvement. Ground Improve 2002; 6(2): 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxson, P, Fernandez-Jimenez, A, Provis, JL, Lukey, GC, Palomo, A, van Deventer, JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science 2007;42(9):2917-2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, DR, Bryan, DP. Aggregates. Industrial Minerals and Rocks, Kogel, EK, Trivedi, NC, Barker, JM, Krukowski, ST (eds), 7th Edition, Littleton, Colorado, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration; 2006. p. 1105-1119.Google Scholar
Khatib, JM. Sustainability of construction materials. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arulrajah, A, Piratheepan, J, Disfani, MM, Bo, MW. Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 2013; 25(8): 10771088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomosawa, F, Noguchi, T. Towards completely recyclable concrete. In: Sakai, K, editor. Integrated design and environmental issues in concrete technology. E & FN Spon, London, UK; 1996. p. 263372.Google Scholar
Costes, JR, Majcherczyk, C, Binkhorst, IP. Total Recycling of Concrete 2007; http://omogine.blogspot.com/.Google Scholar
Aygun, Z and Aygun, M. (2016) Spectroscopic analysis of Ahlat stone (ignimbrite) and pumice formed by volcanic activity. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular spectrocopy. ELSEVIER. Vol, 166: 7378.Google Scholar