Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:28:46.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subwavelength grating wideband reflectors with tapered sidewall profile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2015

W. Yu
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, MI
D. Wu
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, MI
X. Duan
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Y. Yi*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, MI Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
*
Get access

Abstract

One main difference between practical device and ideal design for subwavelength grating structure is the tapered sidewall profile of grating, which is normally obtained by the practical CMOS-compatible fabrication and etching process. Our work has investigated the impacts of tapered sidewall profile on the subwavelength grating wideband reflector characteristics. Both zero-contrast gratings (ZCG) and high- contrast gratings (HCG) are numerically investigated in detail and the results show a distinct differences of the impacts of tapered sidewall profile of grating. The simulation results reveal that this factor play a critical role in determining the reflection bandwidth, average reflectance, and the band edge. Our study has potential in guiding the utilization of subwavelength grating wideband reflector on application of a variety of nanophotonic devices and their integration, as well as to facilitate the design of the fabrication process on the control of tapered sidewall profile.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hessel, A. and Oliner, A.A.,“A new theory of wood’s anomalies on optical gratings,” Appl. Opt. 4, 12751297 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, R., “Wideband reflectors with zero-contrast gratings,” Opt. Lett. 39, 4337 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang-Hasnain, C.J. and Yang, W.,“High-contrast gratings for integrated optoelectronics,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 4, 379440 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateus, C. F. R. et al. , “Ultra-broadband mirror using low index cladded subwavelength grating,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 16, 518 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z. S. et al. , “High-efficiency guided-mode resonance filter,” Opt. Lett. 23, 15561558 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szeghalmi, A., Kley, E. B., and Knez, M., “Theoretical and experimental analysis of the sensitivity of guided mode resonance sensors,” J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 2115021157 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S. F. et al. , “A model for fast predicting and optimizing the sensitivity of surface-relief guided mode resonance sensors,” Sens. Actuators B 176, 11971203 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, A. Y., Zhu, S., and Lo, G. Q., “Guided mode resonance enabled ultra-compact germa- nium photodetector for 1.55 μm detection,” Opt. Express 22, 22472258 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashin, A. V. et al. , “Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing,” Nat. Mater. 8, 867871 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. R. et al. , “Slope-tunable Si nanorod arrays with enhanced antireflection and self-cleaning properties,” Nanoscale 2, 27652768 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangetal, Y..,“Biomimetic corrugated silicon nano cone arrays for self-cleaning antireflec-tion coatings,” Nano Res. 3, 520527 (2010).Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Liu, S., Jiang, H., Zhang, C., and Chen, X., Opt. Lett., 40, 471 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar