Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:47:04.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Graphene Reinforced Natural Rubber Composites: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2018

Raj Chawla
Raj Chawla*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144411, Punjab, India
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Graphene reinforced natural rubber composites are developed to study the improvement in mechanical and tribological properties of natural rubber by the introduction of graphene as reinforcement. Constant strain minimization method has been applied to calculate Young’s and shear modulus of developed structures. A three-layer model containing Fe (Iron) atoms at the top and bottom and polymer matrices in the middle has been constructed to calculate the tribological properties. A shear loading is applied to the top iron nanorod by sliding it to the surface of the polymer matrices for 600 ps with a velocity of 0.01 nm/ps. The results show the increase of 185% in Young’s modulus, 32% in shear modulus and 48% in hardness by reinforcing natural rubber with single-layer graphene oxide sheet, respectively. Also, reduction of 28% and 36% in the friction coefficient and abrasion rate obtained by the introduction of graphene oxide sheet in natural rubber matrix. Also, interaction energy between graphene and natural rubber, the angle, bond and kinetic energy of the polymer and composites has been calculated and discussed.

Keywords

compositeFepolymer
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 10: Theory, Characterization and Modeling , 2018 , pp. 525 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Stankovich, S., Dikin, D.A., Dommett, G.H., Kohlhaas, K.M., Zimney, E.J., Stach, E.A., Piner, R., Nguyen, S.T., and Ruoff, R.S., Nature 442 (7100), 282-286 (2006).Google Scholar
Jiang, J.W., Wang, J.S., and Li, B., Physical Review B 80 (11), 113405 (2009).Google Scholar
Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., and Hone, J., Science 321 (5887), 385-388 (2008).Google Scholar
Mao, Y., Wen, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, F., Panine, P., Chan, T.W., Zhang, L., Liang, Y., and Liu, L., Scientific Reports 3, 2508 (2013).Google Scholar
Rafiee, M.A., Rafiee, J., Wang, Z., Song, H., Yu, Z.Z., and Koratkar, N., ACS Nano 3 (12), 3884-3890 (2009).Google Scholar
Yan, N., Buonocore, G., Lavorgna, M., Kaciulis, S., Balijepalli, S.K., Zhan, Y., Xia, H., and Ambrosio, L., Composites Science and Technology 102, 74–81 (2014).Google Scholar
Wu, X., Lin, T.F., Tang, Z.H., Guo, B.C., and Huang, G.S., Express Polymer Letters 9 (8), 672-685 (2015).Google Scholar
She, X., He, C., Peng, Z., and Kong, L., Polymer 55 (26), 6803-6810 (2014).Google Scholar
Yaragalla, S., Meera, A.P., Kalarikkal, N., and Thomas, S., Industrial Crops and Products 74,792–802 (2015).Google Scholar
Huang, T., Xin, Y., Li, T., Nutt, S., Su, C., Chen, H., Liu, P., and Lai, Z., ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 (11), 4878-4891 (2013).Google Scholar
Brostow, W., Lobland, H.E.H., Hnatchuk, N., and Perez, J.M., Nanomaterials 7 (3), 66 (2017).Google Scholar
Shah, R., Datashvili, T., Cai, T., Wahrmund, J., Menard, B., Menard, K.P., Brostow, W. and Perez, J.M., Materials Research Innovations 19(2), 97-106 (2015).Google Scholar
Brostow, W., Deshpande, S., Hilbig, T. & Simoes, R., Polymer Bulletin 70 (4), 1457-1464 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, J.R., Yang, K.Z., Hilbig, T., Brostow, W. & Simoes, R., Journal of Materials Research 28(21), 3043-3052 (2013)Google Scholar
Sharma, S., Chandra, R., Kumar, P., and Kumar, N., Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 28, 409–419 (2015).Google Scholar
Lin, Q., Qu, L., Lü, Q., and Fang, C., Polymer Testing 32 (2), 330-337 (2013).Google Scholar