Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:38:32.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aqueous leaching of high burnup UO2 fuel under hydrogen conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Anders Puranen ,
Olivia Roth ,
Lena Z. Evins  and
Kastriot Spahiu
Anders Puranen*
Affiliation:
Studsvik Nuclear, Nyköping, Sweden
Olivia Roth
Affiliation:
Studsvik Nuclear, Nyköping, Sweden
Lena Z. Evins
Affiliation:
The Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden
Kastriot Spahiu
Affiliation:
The Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Leaching results on fragments of high burnup (65 MWd/kgU) UO2 fuel from a commercial pressurized water reactor are presented. The experiment was performed in simplified granitic groundwater under a hydrogen pressure of up to 5 MPa, representing conditions in a water intrusion scenario for a Swedish KBS-3 design spent nuclear fuel repository. The freshly crushed fragments were pre-washed for 6 days to remove pre-oxidized matrix and part of the instant release fraction of the radionuclide inventory, and then transferred to an autoclave for leaching under hydrogen conditions. Following an initial release of U attributed to dissolution of a pre-oxidized fuel layer caused by the aerated handling mainly during the transfer from pre-washing to autoclave, the U concentration decreased with time to levels of 2-5x10-9 M, which corresponds, approximately, to the solubility of amorphous UO2. The release of radionuclides such as Cs and Sr gradually declined indicating a transition to inhibition of the fuel matrix dissolution.

Keywords

nuclear materialswaste management
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 19: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XLI , 2018 , pp. 1013 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Puranen, A., Granfors, M., Ekeroth, E., Spahiu, K., (2016) MRS Advances, 1(62), 4169–4175. doi:10.1557/adv.2017.205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fors, P., Carbol, P., WinkelS, Van S, Van, Spahiu, K., (2009) J. Nucl. Mater. 394, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillamont, R. et al. , Update on the chemical thermodynamics of U, Np, Pu, Am and Tc, OECD NEA, Elsevier 2003Google Scholar
Loida, A., Metz, V., Kienzler, B., and Geckeis, H., (2005) J. Nucl. Mat. 346 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spahiu, K., Cui, D., Lundström, M., (2004) Radiochimica Acta. 92 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loida, A., Gens, R., Bube, C., Lemmens, K., Cachoir, C., Mennecart, T., Kienzler, B., (2012) MRS Symp. Proc. Vol. 1475, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, H-U., Low, J., Ekeroth, E., SKB Technical Report TR-11-03. 2011Google Scholar
SKB Technical Report TR-10-52. 2012Google Scholar
Lemmens, K. et al. . (2017) J. Nucl. Mater. 484 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar