Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:48:35.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Labouring lives: the making of home eldercare assistants in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Francesca Degiuli*
Affiliation:
Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, CUNY College of Staten Island, Staten Island NY, New York, USA

Abstract

This paper explores how im/migrant women coming to Italy from all corners of the world and from very different backgrounds in terms of class, education and work experience are transformed into home eldercare assistants. The paper explores how these workers are created through discourses and every day practices enforced at different levels: from the state to the employers, from the mediators to the workers themselves. The creation of these workers has a double function: one is to fill the needs of a welfare state that otherwise would have to radically transform itself in order to provide effective services to the elders and, the other, is to alleviate the pressures of those of the family caregivers, mostly women, who otherwise would collapse under the burden of extended care.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemtani, C. 2004. Le colf: ansie e desideri delle datrici di lavoro. Polis XVIII, no. 1: 137–62.Google Scholar
Andall, J. 2000. Gender, migration and domestic service: The politics of black women in Italy. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1997. Servants and slaves: Europe's domestic workers. Race and Class 39, no. 1: 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. 2000. Doing the dirty work. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 2001. Why madam has so many bathrobes: Demand for migrant domestic workers in the EU. Journal of Social and Economic Geography 92, no. 1: 1826.Google Scholar
Aronson, J. and Naismith, S.. 1996. ‘You're not in there to just do the work’: Depersonalizing policies and the exploitation of home care workers' labour. Gender and Society 10, no. 1: 5977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azz, M., Cardenas, C., Ciafaloni, F., Franzinetti, V., Osmani, I., and Santi, R.. 1998. Lavoro, genere, etnie. Quaderni di Ricerca. Turin, Italy: Ires Lucia Morosini.Google Scholar
Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I.. 1991. Race, nation, and class. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bettio, F., Simonazzi, A.M., and Villa, P.. 2006. Change in care regimes and female migration: The ‘care drain’ in the Mediterranean. Journal of European Social Policy 16, no. 3: 271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bott, E. 2005. Too close for comfort? ‘Race’ and the management of proximity, guilt and other anxieties in paid domestic labour. Sociological Research Online 10, no. 3. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/3/bott.html (accessed August 20, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brah, A. 1996. Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London–New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cardenas, C. 1998. Lavoro, Genere, Etnia. Turin: IRES.Google Scholar
Chang, G. 2000. Disposable domestics: Immigrant women workers in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Chell-Robinson, V. 2000. Female migrants in Italy: Coping in a country of new migration. In Gender and migration in Southern Europe: Women on the move, ed. Anthias, F. and Lazaridis, G., 103–24. Oxford–New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Cominelli, C. 2003. Filippini nel settore domestico: I limiti di una integrazione subalterna. In Immigrazione e Lavoro, ed. Ambrosini, M. and Berti, F.. Sociologia del Lavoro no. 89. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Cotesta, V. 2002. Lo Straniero: pluralismo culturale e immagini dell'altro nella società globale. Rome: Laterza Editori.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. and Timonen, V.. 2010. Obligations, ambitions, calculations: migrant care works negotiations of work, career, and family responsibilities. Journal of Social Politics, 17, no. 1: 2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A.. 2002. Global women. Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
Glucksmann, M. and Lyon, D. 2006. Configurations of care work: Paid and unpaid elder care in Italy and the Netherlands. Sociological Research Online 11, no. 2. http://ideas.repec.org/a/sro/srosro/2006-2-3.html (accessed May 3, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gori, C. 2002. Il welfare nascosto. Il mercato privato dell'assistenza in Italia. Rome: Carocci Editore.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. 1997. The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan/Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, A. 2000. The nanny chain. American Prospect 11, no. 4. http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_nanny_chain (accessed July 24, 2010).Google Scholar
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 2001. Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
INPS. 2003. Ricerca Inps-Caritas su immigrazione e collaborazione domestica. Rome: Caritas.Google Scholar
INRCA-OTE. 2009. Rapporto Nazionale sulle Condizioni e il Pensiero degli Anziani. http://www.governo.it/GovernoInforma/Dossier/rapporto_anziani/ (accessed May 20, 2010).Google Scholar
ISTAT. 2006. Tavole di Mortalita' della Popolazione Residente. Anno 2003. Rome: ISTAT. http://www.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20061024_00/.Google Scholar
ISTAT. 2011. Noi Italia. Cento statistiche per capire il paese dove viviamo. Rome: ISTAT. http://noi-italia.istat.it/index.php?id=6&user_100ind_pi1[uid_categoria].Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. 2000. Do gender role attitudes matter? Journal of Family Issues 21, no. 1: 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, H. 2008. Migration and domestic work: A European perspective on a global issue. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. 2006. The organization of care work in Italy: Gender and migrant labour in the new economy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13, no. 1: 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, H. 2006. An alliance of women: Immigration and the politics of race. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Morini, C. 2001. La serva serve. Roma: Derive e Approdi.Google Scholar
Palese, A., Oliverio, F., Girardo, M.F., Fabbro, E., and Saiani, L.. 2004. Difficulties and workload of foreign caregivers: A descriptive analysis. Diversity in Health and Social Care 1, no. 1: 3138.Google Scholar
Parreñas, R. 2001. Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Piazza, M. 1997. L'ostinata permanenza della non-ovvietà’. Quaderni di Azione Sociale, no. 1: 7986.Google Scholar
Pojimann, W. 2006. Immigrant women and feminism in Italy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ranci, C. 2002. Il welfare sommerso delle badanti. www.lavoce.it (article appeared December 2, 2002).Google Scholar
Roberts, D. 1997. Spiritual and menial housework. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 9, no. 1: 5180.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, C. and Zizza, R.. 2010. (Non)persistent effects of fertility an female labour supply. Working Papers. Banca d'Italia. TD n. 783. http://www.babcaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/econo/temidi/td10/…/sintesi_783.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarti, R. 2004. “Noi abbiamo visto tante città, abbiamo un'attra cultura”. Servizio domestico, migrazioni e identità di genere in Italia: uno sguardo di lungo periodo, in Polis. Ricerche e Studi su società e politica in Italia, XVIII, no. 1: 1746.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2001. Global cities and survival circuits. In Global women: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy, ed. Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A.R.. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Scrinzi, F. 2004. Professioniste della tradizione. Le donne migranti nel mercato del lavoro domestico. Polis XVIII, no. 1: 107–36.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1908/1971. On individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taguieff, P.-A. 2001. The force of prejudice: On racism and its double. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungerson, C. 2000. Cash in care. In Care work: Gender, class, and the welfare state, ed. Harrington-Meyer, M.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wrigley, J. 1995. Other people's children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar