Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:19:35.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FROM NOSTALGIA TO UTOPIA: A GENEALOGY OF FRENCH CONCEPTIONS OF SUPRANATIONALITY (1848–1948)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2019

HUGO CANIHAC
HUGO CANIHAC*
Affiliation:
CReSPo-IEE, Saint-Louis University, Brussels E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay investigates the intellectual history of one of the purportedly most “revolutionary” concepts of post-1945 international thought—the concept of supranationality. While the literature has generally analyzed the concept as a direct continuation of progressive cosmopolitan ideas, or, to the contrary, as a political watchword formulated after 1945 to promote the European project, this essay highlights other, more ambiguous origins for the concept. It retraces the early uses of the concept in French debates. It argues that the irruption of supranationality in the political and legal vocabulary was far from revolutionary, as is typically claimed—without referring directly to the writings of the great classical philosophers. Rather, the concept drew on earlier discourses whose emergence can be identified in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century debates, ranging from Catholic thought to international law. To retrace the genealogy of supranationality in the decades preceding the supranational vogue of the 1950s contributes to illuminating the complex intellectual origins of the European Union and of international thought more generally.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 707 - 736
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the anonymous readers for their stimulating comments, which greatly improved the manuscript. In developing the ideas presented here, I have also received very helpful input from Einar Wigen and the participants of the workshop on The “International”: Entanglement of Language, History and Global IR at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

References

1 Armitage, David, “The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations,” Modern Intellectual History 1/1 (2004), 97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See, for instance, Sluga, Glenda and Clavin, Patricia, eds., Internationalisms: A Twentieth-Century History (Cambridge, 2017)Google Scholar; Duranti, Marco, The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention (New York, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coates, Benjamin Allen, Legalist Empire: International Law and American Foreign Relations in the Early Twentieth Century (New York, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neff, Stephen C., Justice among Nations: A History of International Law (Cambridge, MA, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mazower, Mark, Governing the World: The History of an Idea, (London, 2013)Google Scholar; Guilhot, Nicolas, ed., The Invention of International Relations Theory (New York, 2011)Google Scholar; Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Congress of Europe, Résolution culturelle (The Hague, 1948), 15Google Scholar.

3 Vauchez, Antoine, Brokering Europe: Euro-lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity (Cambridge, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bailleux, Julie, Penser l'Europe par le droit: L'invention du droit communautaire en France (1945–1990) (Paris, 2014)Google Scholar.

4 Weiler, Joseph H. H., “A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors,” Comparative Political Studies 26/4 (1994), 510–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Schumacher, Nestor, Der Wortschatz der europäischen Integration (Düsseldorf, 1976), 102Google Scholar.

6 Bailleux, Penser l'Europe par le droit; Davies, Bill, Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany's Confrontation with European Law 1949–1979 (Cambridge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 E.g. Habermas, Jürgen, The Crisis of the European Union: A Response (Cambridge, 2012)Google Scholar.

8 Mainly, the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and its digitalized collection, especially useful for the identification of pre-twentieth century uses (https://gallica.bnf.fr); the library of Sciences Po, in Paris; the digitalized books on Google Books; the collections on Jstor and Web of Science.

9 Skinner, Quentin, “The Sovereign State: A Genealogy,” in Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Sovereignty in Fragments (Cambridge, 2010), 26–46, at 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bevir, Mark, “What Is Genealogy?”, Journal of the Philosophy of History 2/3 (2008), 263–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Koselleck, Reinhart, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (New York, 2004), 87Google Scholar.

11 Cooper, Frederick, Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945–1960 (Princeton, 2014)Google Scholar.

12 See Wigen, Einar, State of Translation: Turkey in Interlingual Relations (Ann Arbor, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pernau, Margrit, “Whither Conceptual History? From National to Entangled Histories,” Contributions to the History of Concepts 7/1 (2012), 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See Mazower, Governing the World, chap. 1.

14 Other similar uses of the term are to be found at the same period in German literature. It seems to have entered English and Italian vocabularies only a few years later.

15 On the French case see Harrison, Carol E., Romantic Catholics: France's Postrevolutionary Generation in Search of a Modern Faith (Ithaca, 2014)Google Scholar.

16 Vilallonga, Borja, “The Theoretical Origins of Catholic Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe,” Modern Intellectual History 11/2 (2014), 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Bell, David A., The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800 (Cambridge, MA, 2003)Google Scholar.

18 Noiriel, Gérard, “Socio-histoire d'un concept: Les usages du mot ‘nationalité’ au XIXe siècle,” Genèses 20/1 (1995), 4–23, at 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Jennings, Jeremy, Revolution and the Republic: A History of Political Thought in France since the Eighteenth-Century (Oxford, 2011), 233–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Weil, Patrick, How to Be French: Nationality in the Making since 1789 (Durham, NC, 2008)Google Scholar; Rosanvallon, Pierre, Le sacre du citoyen: histoire du suffrage universel en France (Paris, 2008)Google Scholar.

21 See Wilder, Gary, The French Imperial Nation-State: Negritude and Colonial Humanism between the Two World Wars (Chicago, 2005)Google Scholar.

22 Déloye, Yves, École et citoyenneté (Paris, 1994)Google Scholar.

23 De La Rallaye, Léonce Roumain, Le libéralisme jugé par “La Civilta Cattolica” (Paris, 1864), 131Google Scholar.

24 Roumain de la Rallaye, Le libéralisme jugé par “la Civilta cattolica”, 176. Unless specified otherwise, translations are the author's.

25 Other examples may be found in Roca, Abbé, La crise fatale et le salut de l'Europe (Paris, 1885)Google Scholar; Leroy-Beaulieu, Anatole, La papauté, le socialisme et la démocratie: Ouvrage suivi de l'encyclique pontificale sur la condition des ouvriers (Paris, 1892)Google Scholar.

26 d'Alveydre, Alexandre Saint Yves, Mission des souverains, par l'un d'eux (Paris, 1884), 3Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., 7.

28 See Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, 2010), 80–87Google Scholar.

29 Saint Yves d'Alveydre, Mission des souverains, 29.

30 Ibid., 391.

31 Ruyssen, Théodore, “La guerre et le droit,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 14/6 (1906), 796–825, at 807Google Scholar.

32 Favre, Rémi, “Un exemple de pacifisme juridique: Théodore Ruyssen et le mouvement ‘la paix par le droit’ (1884–1950),” Vingtième siècle, revue d'histoire 39/1 (1993), 38–54Google Scholar.

33 On the general context see Tilly, Charles, Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992 (Cambridge, MA, 1992), 96–126Google Scholar; Charle, Christophe, La crise des sociétés impériales (Paris, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Bartolini, Stefano, Restructuring Europe (Oxford, 2005), 56–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Hobsbawm, Eric J., Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge, 1992), 101–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 On the cultural and intellectual context see Burrow, John W., The Crisis of Reason: European Thought, 1848–1914 (New Haven, 2002)Google Scholar.

37 Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations; Coates, Legalist Empire, 59–85.

38 Neff, Justice among Nations, 217–339.

39 Jouanjan, Olivier and Zoller, Elisabeth, Le “moment 1900”: Critique sociale et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux États-Unis (Paris, 2015)Google Scholar.

40 Stolleis, Michael, Public Law in Germany, 1800–1914 (New York, 2001), 419–60Google Scholar.

41 Berend, T. Iván, An Economic History of Nineteenth-Century Europe: Diversity and Industrialization (Cambridge and New York, 2013), 295Google Scholar.

42 Neff, Justice among Nations, 271.

43 Haferkamp, Hans-Peter, “The Science of Private Law and the State in Nineteenth Century Germany,” American Journal of Comparative Law 56/3 (2008), 667–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Zitelman, Ernst, Internationales Privatrecht (Leipzig, 1897), 25Google Scholar.

45 Triepel, Heinrich, Droit international et droit interne (Paris, 1920), 24–26Google Scholar.

46 Kahn, Franz, Über Inhalt, Nature und Methode des internationalen Privatsrecht (Jena, 1899), 37–39Google Scholar.

47 For instance, Lorenzen, Ernest G., “Internationales Privatrecht, by Ernst Zitelmann,” American Journal of International Law 9/3 (1915), 767–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Beaud, Olivier and Wachsmann, Patrick, La science juridique française et la science juridique allemande de 1870 à 1918 (Strasbourg, 1997)Google Scholar.

49 Pillet, Antoine, Recherches sur les droits fondamentaux des états (Paris, 1899)Google Scholar.

50 Pillet, Antoine, Principes de droit international privé (Paris, 1903), 59Google Scholar.

51 Ibid., 15.

52 Eg., De La Grasserie, Raoul, Du fédéralisme (Paris, 1907)Google Scholar.

53 See Mazower, Governing the World, chap. 3.

54 Wehberg, Hans, The Problem of an International Court of Justice (Oxford, 1918), 112Google Scholar.

55 Krabbe, Hugo, The Modern Idea of the State (New York and London, 1922), 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations, 315.

57 Coates, Legalist Empire, 88–95.

58 Lindeiner-Wildau, Klaus Von, La supranationalité en tant que principe de droit (Leiden, 1970), 18Google Scholar.

59 Schumacher, Der Wortschatz der europäischen Integration, 98.

60 Wehberg, The Problem of an International Court of Justice.

61 Neff, Justice among Nations, 266–67.

62 Snow, Alpheus H., “The Law of Nations,” American Journal of International Law 6/4 (1912), 890–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Ibid., 892.

64 Ibid., 892–93.

65 Snow, Alpheus H., “International Law and Political Science,” American Journal of International Law 7/2 (1913), 315–28, at 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Ibid., 317.

67 Ibid., 318.

68 Snow, “The Law of Nations,” 898.

69 On the context see Jouanjan and Zoller, Le “moment 1900”; Sacriste, Guillaume, La république des constitutionnalistes (Paris, 2011)Google Scholar; Bates, David, “Political Unity and the Spirit of Law: Juridical Concepts of the State in the Late Third Republic,” French Historical Studies 28/1 (2005), 69–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, H. S., The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic (Cambridgeand New York, 1993)Google Scholar.

70 Blanquer, Jean-Michel and Milet, Marc, L'invention de l’état: Léon Duguit, Maurice Hauriou et la naissance du droit public moderne (Paris, 2015), 83–84Google Scholar.

71 Beaud, Olivier, “Hauriou et le droit naturel,” Revue d'histoire des facultés de droit et de la culture juridique 6 (1988), 123–38Google Scholar.

72 Barroche, Julien, “Maurice Hauriou, juriste catholique ou libéral?”, Revue française d'histoire des idées politiques 2/28 (2008), 307–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Guieu, Jean-Michel, Le rameau et le glaive: Les militants français pour la Société des nations (Paris, 2008), 154Google Scholar.

74 Laqua, Daniel, “Reconciliation and the Post-war Order: The Place of the Deutsche Liga für Menschenrechte in Interwar Pacifism,” in Laqua, ed., Internationalism Reconfigured: Transnational Ideas and Movements between the World Wars (Londonand New York, 2011), 209–38, at 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Snow, Alpheus H., “Le droit des nations,” Revue générale de droit international public, 19 (1912), 309–18Google Scholar.

76 Martti Koskenniemi, “Nationalism, Universalism, Empire: International Law in 1871 and 1919,” paper presented at the Whose international Community? Universalism and the Legacies of Empire conference, Columbia University, 2005, 3.

77 Duranti, The Conservative Human Rights Revolution, 51.

78 In the same direction see Elias, Norbert, “Thomas More's Critique of the State: With Some Thoughts on a Definition of the Concept of Utopia,” in Elias, Essays I: On the Sociology of Knowledge and the Sciences, vol. 14 (Dublin, 2009), 212–57Google Scholar.

79 Redor, Marie-Joëlle, De l’état légal à l’état de droit: L’évolution des conceptions de la doctrine publiciste française: 1879–1914 (Paris, 1992), 297–347Google Scholar.

80 Cited in Baumert, Renaud, La découverte du juge constitutionnel entre science et politique (Paris, 2009), 306Google Scholar.

81 Ibid., 41–3.

82 Hawkins, Mike, “Corporatism and Third Way Discourses in Inter-war France,” Journal of Political Ideologies 7/3 (2002), 301–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Weil and Porter, How to Be French, 53.

84 See Conklin, Alice L., A Mission to Civilize: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930 (Stanford, 2001), chap. 5Google Scholar.

85 Ibid., 176.

86 Cooper, Citizenship between Empire and Nation.

87 Herrera, Carlos Miguel, “Un juriste aux prises du social: Sur le projet de Georges Scelle,” Revue française d'histoire des idées politiques 21/1 (2005), 113–37, at 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Scelle, Georges, Le pacte des nations et sa liaison avec le Traité de paix (Paris, 1919)Google Scholar.

89 Scelle, Georges, “La doctrine de Léon Duguit et les fondements du droit des gens,” Archives de philosophie du droit et de sociologie juridique 1–2 (1932), 83–119Google Scholar.

90 Scelle, Georges, Précis de droit des gens (Paris, 1932), 2Google Scholar.

91 Ibid., 8.

92 Scelle, Georges, Précis de législation industrielle (Paris, 1930)Google Scholar.

93 Ibid., 57.

94 Ibid., 13.

95 A famous controversy opposed them in 1925, when Scelle was appointed to the University of Paris by the minister, while the law faculty had elected Le Fur. In the face of the troubles that resulted, Le Fur was finally given the position. Milet, Marc, La Faculté de droit de Paris face à la vie politique: De l'affaire Scelle à l'affaire Jèze 1925–1936 (Paris, 1996)Google Scholar.

96 Audren, Frédéric, “La belle époque des juristes catholiques,” Revue française d'histoire des idées politiques 2/28 (2008), 233–71, at 252CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Fur, Louis Le, Développement historique du droit international: De l'anarchie internationale à une communauté internationale organisée (The Hague, 1932), 548Google Scholar.

98 Fur, Louis Le, État fédéral et confédération d’états (Paris, 1896), 577Google Scholar.

99 Fur, Louis Le, Précis de droit international public (Paris, 1939), 9Google Scholar.

100 Fur, Louis Le, “Fédéralisme et union européenne,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 11 (1942), 12–23, at 17Google Scholar.

101 Deroussin, David, “L'idée corporative saisie par les juristes: De la corporation au pluralisme juridique?”, Les études sociales 157–8/1 (2013), 147–85, at 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Fur, Louis Le, Races, nationalités et états (Paris, 1922), 149Google Scholar.

103 Le Fur, “Fédéralisme et union européenne,” 23.

104 See, also, Neff, Justice among Nations, 293.

105 On this lasting interpretation of pacifist interwar ideas see Waever, Ole, “The Speech Act of Realism: The Move That Made IR,” in Guilhot, Nicolas, ed., The Invention of International Relations Theory (New York, 2011), 97–127Google Scholar. For a recent reappraisal of the League see Pedersen, Susan, The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire (Oxford, 2018)Google Scholar.

106 Wertheim, Stephen, “The League That Wasn't: American Designs for a Legalist–Sanctionist League of Nations and the Intellectual Origins of International Organization, 1914–1920,” Diplomatic History 35/5 (2011), 797–836, at 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Le Fur, Développement historique du droit international, 598.

108 Fur, Louis Le, Règles générales du droit de la paix (The Hague, 1935), 236Google Scholar; Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations, 320.

109 Scelle, Georges, La Société des nations: Sa nécessité, son but, ses origines, son organisation (Paris, 1925), 4Google Scholar, original emphasis.

110 Marbeau, Michel, La Société des nations: Vers un monde multilatéral: 1919–1946 (Tours, 2017), 133–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Scelle, La Société des nations, 23.

112 Slobodian, Quinn, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reinhoudt, Jurgen and Audier, Serge, The Walter Lippmann Colloquium: The Birth of Neo-liberalism (Cham, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 Nouvel, Yves, “Le droit interindividuel total,” in Charalambos, Apostolidis and Tourard, Hélène, eds., Actualité de Georges Scelle (Dijon, 2013), 121–32Google Scholar.

114 Quoted in Slobodian, Globalists, 15.

115 Ibid., 94. Hayek, Friedrich, The Road to Serfdom (Chicago, 2007), 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

116 Le Fur, “Fédéralisme et union européenne,” 19.

117 Quotation translated from Schmitt, Carl, La question clé de la Société des nations: Le passage au concept de guerre discriminatoire (Paris, 2009), 29Google Scholar; in English see Schmitt, , “The Turn to the Discriminating Concept of War,” in Schmitt, Writings on War (Cambridge, 2011), 30–74Google Scholar. In this essay, he explicitely challenges G. Scelle and his concept of a supranational law.

118 Le Fur, “Fédéralisme et union européenne,” 21.

119 On the Nazis’ concepts for Europe see recently Dafinger, Johannes and Pohl, Dieter, eds., A New Nationalist Europe under Hitler: Concepts of Europe and Transnational Networks in the National Socialist Sphere of Influence, 1933–1945 (New York, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elvert, Jürgen, “The New European Order of National Socialism: Some Remarks on Its Source, Genesis and Nature,” in Gosewinkel, Dieter, ed., Anti-liberal Europe: A Neglected Story of Europeanization (New York, 2014)Google Scholar.

120 G. Scelle cited in Chabot, Jean-Luc, Aux origines intellectuelles de l'Union européenne: L'idée d'Europe unie de 1919 à 1939 (Grenoble, 2005), 131Google Scholar.

121 See Herrera, “Un juriste aux prises du social,” 124–5.

122 Scelle, Georges, Le sens international (Paris, 1942), 53Google Scholar.

123 Republished in Hayek, Friedrich, Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago, 1958)Google Scholar.