Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:43:30.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metasomatism of cumulus magnesian olivine by iron-rich postcumulus liquids in the upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Roger N. Scoon*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa

Abstract

Hybrid olivine grains from locally concordant contact zones between bodies of iron-rich ultramafic pegmatite (postcumulate) and layered harzburgite (cumulate) are distinguished from cumulus olivine grains by petrographic features and compositional differences. The hybrid olivines, which in comparison with the cumulus crystals are Fe-Mn-rich and Mg-Ni-poor, represent an arrested stage of replacement and exhibit unusually high NiO/MgO ratios. These features are explained by a disequilibrium process of cation-for-cation exchange between crystals and silicate liquid i.e. magmatic metasomatism. Plots of cations across a contact zone give straight line relationships, a function of the extent to which the metasomatizing liquid infiltrated the cumulate layer. A plot of NiO against MgO enables a distinction to be made between metasomatic olivine and olivine that has fractionally crystallized from a tholeiitic magma. These metasomatic olivines all formed by the replacement of pre-existing cumulus olivine and no chemical evidence has been found to support the formation of olivine in iron-rich ultramafic pegmatite bodies by metasomatism of other phases.

Type
Geochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bence, A.E., and Albee, A.L. (1968) J. Geol. 76, 382 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N.L., and Tutfle, O.F. (1949) Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 50, 439-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E.N., and Desborough, (3. A. (1964) Econ. Geol. 59, t97-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, E.N., and Desborough, and Glover, E.D. (1973) Am. Mineral. 58, 172-88.Google Scholar
Irvine, T.N. (1980) In Physics of magmatic processes(R. B. Hargreaves, ed.), 325-83.Google Scholar
Korzhinsky, D.S. (1965) Am. J. Sci. 263, 193-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnis, A. (1979) Mineral. Mag. 43, 293-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoon, R.N. (1985) Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.Google Scholar
Scoon, R.N. and de Klerk, W.J. (1987) Can. Mineral. 25, 51-77.Google Scholar
Viljoen, M.J., and Scoon, R.N. (1985) Econ. Geol. 80, 110-928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, M.J., and Scoon, R.N. Theron, J.C., Underwood, B., Waiters, B.M., Weaver, J., and Peyerl, W. (1986) In Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa(Anhaeusser, C., and Maske, S., eds.), 104-160.Google Scholar
Wager, L.R., and Brown, G.M. (1968) Layered igneous rocks,Oliver and Boyd, 588 pp.Google Scholar
Wagner, P.A. (1929) The platinum mines and deposits of South Africa,Oliver and Boyd, 326 pp.Google Scholar