Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:48:36.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Face-to-Face’ relationships between oxocentred tetrahedra and cation-centred tetrahedral oxyanions in crystal structures of minerals and inorganic compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. V. Krivovichev
Affiliation:
Department of Crystallography, St. Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
G. L. Starova
Affiliation:
Department of Crystallography, St. Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
S. K. Filatov
Affiliation:
Department of Crystallography, St. Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Detailed analysis of the crystal structures of minerals and inorganic compounds containing oxocentred [OCu4] tetrahedra reveals the following principle for relationships between oxocentred tetrahedra and tetrahedral oxyanions (Tn+O4)−(8−n) with T = S6+ or V5+, or triangular pyramidal oxyanions (SeO3)2− (which may be considered as (SeO3E)2− tetrahedra assuming the lone pair E of selenium to be a fourth ligand): (Tn+O4)−(8−n) tetrahedra are ‘attached’ to the oxocentred tetrahedra so that their grounds (O-O-O and Cu-Cu-Cu) are parallel to each other and the mutual orientation is regular (O corners are exactly under Cu corners). We propose to describe these relationships as ‘face-to-face’, meaning that the oxocentred and cation-centred tetrahedra ‘meet’ along their ‘whole’ triangular faces. Geometric characteristics of ‘face-to-face’ relationships are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berrigan, R. and Gatehouse, B.M. (1996) Cu3Er(SeO3)2O2Cl, the erbium analogue of franci-site. Acta Crystallogr., C52, 496–7Google Scholar
Brunel-Lauegt, M. and Guitel, J.C. (1977) Structure cristalline de Cu5O2(PO4)2. Acta Crystallogr.,B33, 3465–8.Google Scholar
Effenberger, H. (1986) PbCu3(OH)(NO3)(SeO3)3(H2O).5 und Pb2Cu3O2(NO3)2(SeO3)2. Synthese und Kristallstrukturuntersuchung. Monatsh. Chem., 117, 1099–106.Google Scholar
Effenberger, H. and Pertlik, F. (1986) Die Kristallstrukturen der Kupfer(II)-oxo-selenite Cu2O(SeO3) (kubisch und monoklin) und Cu4O(SeO3)3 (monoklin und triklin). Monatsh. Chem., 117, 887–96.Google Scholar
Engel, P. (1986) Geometric Crystallography: An Axiomatic Introduction to Crystallography. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Filatov, S.K., Semenova, T.F. and Vergasova, L.P. (1992) Types of polymerization of [OCu4]6+ in inorganic compounds with ‘additional’ oxygen atoms. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 322, 536–9 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S.V. and Filatov, S.K. (1998) Confirmation of single chains of edge-sharing anion-centred tetrahedra. Z Kristallogr., 213, 316–8.Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S.V., Filatov, S.K., Semenova, T.F. and Rozhdestvenskaya, I.V. (1998 a) Crystal chemistry of inorganic compounds based on the oxocentred chains. I. Crystal structure of chloromenite, Cu9O2(SeO3)4Cl6. Z. Kristallogr., 213, 645–64.Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S.V., Filatov, S.K. and Semenova, T.F. (1998 b) Types of cationic complexes on the base of oxocentred tetrahedra [OM4] in crystal structures of inorganic compounds. Russ. Chem. Reviews, 67, 137–55.Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S.V., Shuvalov, R.R., Semenova, T.F. and Filatov, S.K. (1999) Crystal chemistry of inorganic compounds based on the oxocentred chains. III. Crystal structure of georgbokiite, Cu5O2(SeO3)2Cl2. Z. Kristallogr.,(in press).Google Scholar
Lulei, M., Steinwand, S.J. and Corbett, J.D. (1995) Interstitially-stabilized praseodymium(III) compounds Na2Pr4Br9NO and Pr8Brl3N3O: structures on the border between salts and clusters. Inorg. Chem., 34, 2671–7.Google Scholar
Pring, A., Gatehouse, B.M. and Birch, W.D. (1990) Francisite, Cu3Bi(SeO3)2O2Cl, a new mineral from Iron Monarch, South Australia: description and crystal structure. Amer. Mineral., 75, 1421–5.Google Scholar
Schleid, Th. (1996) [NM4] tetrahedra in nitride sulfides and chlorides of the trivalent lanthanides. Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem., 33, 227–40.Google Scholar
Scordari, F. and Stasi, F. (1990) The crystal structure of euchlorine, NaKCu3O(SO4)3. Neues Jb. Mineral., Abh., 161, 241–53.Google Scholar
Shannon, R. D. and Calvo, C. (1973) Crystal structure of Cu5V2O10. Acta Crystallogr.,B29, 1338–45.Google Scholar
Starova, G.L., Filatov, S.K., Fundamensky, V.S. and Vergasova, L.P. (1991) The crystal structure of fedotovite, K2Cu3O(SO4)3. Mineral. Mag., 55, 613–6.Google Scholar
Starova, G.L., Krivovichev, S.V., Fundamensky, V.S. and Filatov, S.K. (1997) The crystal structure of averievite Cu5O2(VO4)2.MCI: comparison with related compounds. Mineral. Mag., 61, 441–6.Google Scholar
Varaksina, T.V., Fundamensky, V.S., Filatov, S.K. and Vergasova, L.P. (1990) The crystal structure of kamchatkite, a new naturally occuring oxychloride sulphate of potassium and copper. Mineral. Mag., 54, 613–6.Google Scholar