Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T19:32:08.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of coal combustion products in stream sediments by chemical analysis and magnetic-susceptibility measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

S. Frančišković*
Affiliation:
“Ruder Bošković”, POB 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia
*

Abstract

Coal slag and ash, obtained from burning coal in a textile factory in Duga Resa (Croatia) was discharged directly into the Mrežnica River for 110 y (1884–1994), from where it travelled to the Korana River and further to the Kupa River at Karlovac, a total of ~50km from its source. Of 54 elements determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in the <2 mm sediment fraction, a number of anomalously high levels were recorded. The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) for the anomalous elements were: Hg (1.88), B (4.05), Na (1.44), Al (2.05), V (1.65), Cr (1.20), Fe (1.18), Ni (2.10), Cu (2.37), Sr (0.97), Zr (3.27), Mo (3.34) and U (4.03). Low-field magnetic susceptibility (MS) was measured for each sample. The Igeo for MS in the anomalous region is 5.85. Correlation analysis showed good correlation (>0.90) of MS with: B (0.96), U (0.95), Zr (0.94), Sr (0.93), Na (0.92), Mo (0.92) and Ni (0.90). Cluster analysis of R-modality indicates that MS is linked to B, Mo, Na and U. Low correlation of MS with Fe (0.36) suggests that Fe in stream sediments is not in a ferromagnetic form. Neither maghemite, nor magnetite phases were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) in the sediments. Low-field magnetic susceptibility provides an indicator of contamination of river sediments by transported coal slag and ash, although it cannot be prescribed to a single element.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fermi, (2008) Magnetic susceptibility of the elements and inorganic compounds. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, document 4–135, available online: http://www-dO.fnal.gov/hardware/cal/lvps-info/engineering/elementmagn.pdf Google Scholar
Förstner, U., Ahlf, W. and Calmano, W. (1993) Sediment quality objectives and criteria development in Germany. Water Science and Technology, 28, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frančišković-Bilinski, S. (2006) Barium anomaly in Kupa River drainage basin. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 88, 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franciskovic-Bilinski, S. (2007) An assessment of multielemental composition in stream sediments of Kupa River drainage basin, Croatia for evaluating sediment quality guidelines. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 5, 561–575.Google Scholar
Kapička, A., Jordanova, N, Petrovsky, E. and Ustjak, S. (2001) Effect of different soil conditions on magnetic parameters of power-plant fly ashes. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 48, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashif, I., Farouk, H., Aly, S.A., Moustaffa, F.A., Sanad, A.M. and Abo-Zeid, Y.M. (1991) Structure and magnetic susceptibility of irradiated sodium borate glasses containing nickel oxide. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Electronics, 2, 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, G. (1979) Schwermetalle in den Sedimenten des Rheines - Vera¨nderungen seit 1971. Umschau, 79, 778–785.Google Scholar
Petrovsky, E., Kapička, A., Jordanova, N., Knab, M. and Hoffmann, V. (2000) Low-field magnetic susceptibility susceptibility: a proxy method of estimating increased pollution of different environmental systems. Environmental Geology, 39, 312–318.Google Scholar
Scholger, R. (1998) Heavy metal pollution monitoring by magnetic susceptibility measurements applied to sediments of the river Mur (Styria, Austria. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, 25–37.Google Scholar