Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:46:36.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hornblende—anthophyllite and hornblende—cummingtonite parageneses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. Choudhuri
A. Choudhuri*
Affiliation:
Geological Survey Department, Georgetown, Guyana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The associations hornblende and anthophyllite or cummingtonite are dealt with briefly in the light of experimental data and naturally occurring assemblages. On the basis of the distribution of Mg and Fe2+ in coexisting amphiboles and on the calculated and experimental slopes of a reaction in which the amphiboles hornblende and anthophyllite are formed a tentative P-T-x diagram is suggested for these parageneses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 292 , December 1970 , pp. 923 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akella, (J.) and Winkler, (H. G. F.), 1966. Contr. Min. Petr. 12, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, (G. M.), 1964. Geochbnica Acta, 28, 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhuri, (A.) and Winkler, (H. G. F.), 1967. Contr. Min. Petr. 14, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howle, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1965. Rock-forming Minerals, 2. London (Longmans).Google Scholar
Denbigh, (K.), 1964. Principles of Chemical Equilibrium. Cambridge (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ernst, (W. G.), 1966. Amer. Journ. Sci. 264, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskola, (P.), 1914. Bull. Comm. géol. Finlande, 40, 1.Google Scholar
Eskola, (P.), 1950. Amer. Min. 35, 728.Google Scholar
Eugster, (H. P.) and Wones, (D. R.), 1962. Journ. Petrology, 3, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fvfe, (W. S.), Turner, (F. J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1958. Mere. Geol. Soc. Amer. 73.Google Scholar
Greenwood, (H. J.), 1963. Journ. Petrology, 4, 317 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinrichsen, (TH.), 1967. Neues Jahrb. Min. Monatsh. 257.Google Scholar
Kanisawa, (S.), 1969. Contr. Min. Petr. 20, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, (G. C.), 1950. Amer. Journ. Sci. 248, 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, (C.), 1968. Journ. Petrology, 9, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, (B. E.), 1968. Geol. Soc. America Spec. Paper, 98, 26.Google Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.), 1958. Journ. Fac. Sci. Tokyo, 11, 220.Google Scholar
Robie, (R. A.), 1966. Mere. Geol. Soc. America, 97.Google Scholar
Robinson, (P.), Jaffe, (H. W.), Klein, (C.), and Ross, (M.), 1969. Contr. Min. Petr. 22, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schürmann, (K.), 1967. Neues Jahrb. Min. Monatsh. 270.Google Scholar
Seitsaari, (J.), 1952. Ann..4cad. Sc. Fennica, Set. A, 3, 30.Google Scholar
Shirozu, (H.), 1958. Min. Journ. Japan, 2, 209.Google Scholar
Thompson, (J. B.) Jr., 1955. Amer. Journ. Sci. 253, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, (C. E.), 1957. Amer. Min. 42, 412.Google Scholar
Winkler, (H. G. F.), 1967. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks. Berlin and Heidelberg (Springer Verlag.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar