Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:54:40.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paragenesis of the metasomatic actinolite-bearing rocks from the Khetri copper belt, Rajasthan, India1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S. P. Das Gupta
S. P. Das Gupta*
Affiliation:
Central Petrological Laboratories, Geological Survey of India, Calcutta-13
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the south-eastern part of the Khetri copper belt, actinolite occurs in association with alteration assemblages resulting from the Fe-Mg metasomatism that accompanied sulphide mineralization, and more commonly with albite-bearing rocks formed by albitization of quartzites and schists near granitic rocks. Within the latter occur many coarse, massive, and unoriented aggregates of actinolite crystals, individuals being commonly more than 10 cm long. Locally fluorite-bearing veins oecur within granitic and albite-quartz rocks. The actinolite is pleochroic from pale pink to green; γ: [001] = 26°; γ = 1·642 ± 0·003; 2Vα = 80°. The composition of the analysed actinolite closely compares with those published in the literature excepting in (OH), which is low. The mineral assemblages, formed by metasomatic replacement of pre-existing rocks, are equivalent to those of albite-epidote-amphibolite facies. The metasomatic fluid was apparently rich in Ca, F (indicated by fluorite), and oxygen (indicated by magnetite, ilmenite, and hematite).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 277 , March 1967 , pp. 22 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published with the kind permission of the Director-General, Geological Survey of India.

References

Arnold, (R. G.), 1962. Econ. Geol., vol. 57, pp. 72–90.Google Scholar
Berry, (L. G.) and Mason, (B. H.), 1959. Mineralogy, Charles E. Tuttle Co., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1960. Proc. 47th Indian Sci. Congr., pt. 3, p. 274.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1962. Indian Min., vol. 16, p. 67.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1964. Special vol. of Petrological Research, Geol. Surv. India.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1964a. Indian Min., vol. 17, p. 303.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1964b. Ibid., vol. 18, p. 255.Google Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howi, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1963. Rock Forming Minerals, vol. 2, pp. 234–317.Google Scholar
Fyfe, (W. S.), Turner, (F. J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1958. Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem. 73, p. 162.Google Scholar
Geijer, (P.), 1960. Arkiv Min. Geol., vol. 2, p. 481.Google Scholar
Groves, (A. W.), 1935. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 91, p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, (A. M.), 1923. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. 54, pp. 345–397.Google Scholar
Kullerud, (G.) and Yoder, (H. S.), 1963. Ann. Rept. Dir. Geophys. Lab. for 1962-63, pp. 215-218.Google Scholar
Kullerud, (G.) and Yoder, (H. S.), 1964. Ibid., for 1963-64, pp. 218-222.Google Scholar
Macdonald, (G. A.), 1941. Amer. Min. vol. 26, p. 276.Google Scholar
Rot Chowdhury, (M. K.) and Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1965. Econ Geol., vol. 60, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Rot Chowdhury, (M. K.) and Das Gupta, (S. P.), 1965a. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci., vol. 31, A, pp. 188–198.Google Scholar
Turner, (F. J.), 1949. Geol. Soc. Amer., Mem. 30, pp. 76–89.Google Scholar