Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:17:07.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Life Tables in Paleodemography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

James A. Moore ,
Alan C. Swedlund  and
George J. Armelagos
James A. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Alan C. Swedlund
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
George J. Armelagos
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Anthropologists have become increasingly aware of the importance of population as a factor in a systematic view of human biological and cultural development. This awareness has generated an interest in the field of demography, and consequently, techniques once utilized almost exclusively by demographers are now frequently utilized for anthropological studies. Anthropological-paleodemographic inquiry traditionally starts with the excavation of a skeletal population sample. The sample is aged and sexed, and the data are put into a descriptive analytic model–the life table. The life table, through a process of inference, is taken to represent the life processes of a local biological population and often forms the basis for further inference on the relationships between populational and cultural processes (Green and others 1974; Howell-Lee 1971).

Critics have questioned the assumption of life table construction and cited various sources of error in data collection to argue against the use of life tables as a source of inference concerning the biological population. In this paper we will attempt to address some of these sources of error. Specifically, we will discuss the effects of enumeration errors, population growth, and small population size on life table values. To assess the impact of these errors on life table values of “anthropological” populations, we make use of computer simulation. We conclude that, once the implications of these factors are understood, the life table can provide a useful model for paleodemographic research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology , Volume 30: Population Studies in Archaeology and Biological Anthropology: A Symposium , 1975 , pp. 57 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acsádi, C., and Nemeskéri, J. 1970 History of human lifespan and mortality. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar
Angel, L. 1969 The basis of paleodemography. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30:427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. 1955 An introduction to stochastic processes with special reference to methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 1973 On the estimation of some demographic characteristics on a prehistoric population from the American Southwest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 39:223–232.Google Scholar
Carrier, L. 1958 A note on the estimation of mortality and other population characteristics given deaths by age. Population Studies 12:149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, C. L. 1960a A stochastic study of the life table and its applications. I: Probability distributions of biometric functions. Biometrics 16:618–635.Google Scholar
Chiang, C. L. 1960b A stochastic study of the life table and its applications. II: Sample variance of the observed expectation of life and other biometric functions. Human Biology 32:221–238.Google Scholar
Chiang, C. L. 1968 Introduction to stochastic processes in biostatistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Borah, W. 1971 Essays in population history: Mexico and the Caribbean, Vol. I. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Green, S., Green, S., and Armelagos, G. J. 1974 Settlement and mortality of the Christian site (1050-1300 A.D.) of Meinarti (Sudan). Journal of Human Evolution 3:297–316.Google Scholar
Howell-Lee, N. 1971 The feasibiUty of demographic studies in small and remote populations. Paper presented to the Columbia University Ecology Seminar, December.Google Scholar
Keyfitz, N. 1968 Introduction to the mathematics of population. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Lallo, J., Rose, J., and Armelagos, G. J. 1974 An ecological interpretation of variation in mortality within three prehistoric American Indian populations from Dickson Mounds. In Communication, evolution and movement of people along the Cordilleras of the Americas, edited by Bowman, D. L.. Mouton, The Hague (in press).Google Scholar
Leslie, P. H. 1958 The properties of a stochastic model for two competing species. Biometrika 39:363–388.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. 1907 Relation between birth and death rates. Science 26:21–22.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. 1931a The structure of a growing population. Human Biology 3:459–493.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. 1931b The extinction of families. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 21:377–453.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. A. 1974 Population dynamics at Grasshopper, Arizona. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Amherst, Massachusetts, April, 1974.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. 1974 Computer simulation of incest prohibition and clan proscription rules in closed, finite populations. In Computer simulation in human population studies, edited by Dyke, B. and McClure, J..Google Scholar
Sanders, W., and Price, B. 1968 Mesoamerica. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Seber, G. A. F. 1973 The estimation of animal abundances and related parameters. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956 Nonparametric statistics. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, G. J. 1956 Life tables from limited data: a demographic approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A., and Armelagos, G. J. 1969 Une recherche en Paleo-demographie: La Nubie Soudanaise. Annates Economies–Societies–Civilisations 6.Google Scholar
Swedlund, A., and Sessions, S. 1974 A developmental model of prehistoric population growth on Black Mesa, northeast Arizona. In Papers on the archeology of Black Mesa, edited by Gumermanand, G. Euler, R.. Southern Illinois University Press. Carbondale (in press).Google Scholar
Sykes, Z. M. 1969 Some stochastic versions of the matrix model for population dynamics. American Statistical Association Journal 72:111–130.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M. 1972 On the systematic bias in skeletal sexing. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 37:239–250.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M. 1973a A method for approximation of age-specific fertility. Human Biology 45:195–210.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M. 1973b Demographic models for anthropology. Society for American Archeology, Memoir 27.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. M. 1973 Anthropological demography: the implications of computer simulation. Paper presented to the Columbia University Ecology Seminar.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. M. 1974 Boundary conditions for paleolithic social systems. American Antiquity 39:147–178.Google Scholar