Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:58:44.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value groups and simple transcendental extensions

Part of: Topological fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Sudesh K. Khanduja
Sudesh K. Khanduja
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Panjab University, Chandigarh–160014, India
Get access

Extract

Introduction. Throughout the paper K(x) is a simple transcendental extension of a field K; v is a valuation of K and w is an extension of v to K(x). Also koÍk and GoÍG denote respectively the residue fields and the value groups of the valuations v and w. A well-known theorem conjectured by Nagata asserts that either k is an algebraic extension of feo or k is a simple transcendental extension of a finite extension of ko (cf [4] or [6] or [1, Corollary 2.3]). We prove here an analogous result for the value groups viz. either G/ Go is a torsion group or there exists a subgroup G1 of G containing Go with [G1: Go] > ∞ such that G is the direct sum of G1 and an infinite cyclic group. Incidentally we obtain a description of the valuation w as well as of its residue field in the second case. Thus a characterization of all those extensions w of v to K(x), for which w(K(x)\{0})/Go is not a torsion group, is given. Corresponding to such a valuation w, we define three numbers N, S and T which satisfy the inequality N ≥= ST. This is analogous to the fundamental inequality established by Ohm (cf. [5, 1.2]) for residually transcendental extensions of v to K(x). We also investigate the conditions under which N = ST

MSC classification

Secondary: 12J20: General valuation theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , December 1991 , pp. 381 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Alexandru, V., Popescu, N. and Zaharescu, A.. A theorem of characterisation of residual transcendental extensions of a valuation. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 28 (1988), 579–592.Google Scholar
2.Ax., J. A mathematical approach to some problems in number theory. 1969 Number Theory Institute. Proc. Symposia in Pure Math, XX (Amer. Math. Soc, 1971), 161–194.Google Scholar
3.Endler, O.. Valuation Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ohm, J.. The ruled residue theorem for simple transcendental extensions of valued fields. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 89 (1983), 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ohm, J.. Simple transcendental extensions of valued fields II: A fundamental inequality. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 25 (1985), 583–596.Google Scholar
6.Popescu, N.. On a problem of Nagata in valuation theory. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 31 (1986), 639–641.Google Scholar