Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:05:18.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of distant sidewalls on the transition to finite amplitude Bénard convection—II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

P. G. Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The City University, St. John Street, London.
Get access

Abstract

A two-dimensional fluid layer of height d is confined laterally by rigid sidewalls distance 2Ld apart, where L, the semi-aspect ratio of the layer, is large. Constant temperatures are maintained at the upper and lower boundaries while at the sidewalls it is assumed that the horizontal heat flux has magnitude λ. If λ = 0 (perfect insulation) a finite amplitude motion sets in when the Rayleigh number R reaches a critical value Rc, but in part I (Daniels 1977) it was shown that if λ = O(L−1) this bifurcation (in a state diagram of amplitude versus Rayleigh number) is displaced into a single stable solution in the region |RRc| = O(L−2), representing a smooth increase in amplitude of the cellular motion with Rayleigh number. All other solutions (or “secondary modes”) in this region were shown to be unstable. In the present paper an examination of the two intermediate regimes λ − O(L−5/2) and λ = O(L−2) is carried out, to trace the location of an additional stable solution in the form of a secondary mode, which stems from Rc when λ = 0, and which in the limit as λL2 → ∞ is shown to be removed from the region ߋR − Rc| = 0(L−2), consistent with the results of I.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlers, G.. 1975, Fluctuations, instabilities and phase transitions ed. Riste, T. (Plenum Press, New York), p. 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B.. 1977, Univ. Essex Fluid Mech. Res. Inst. Report No. 83.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.. 1962, Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability (Oxford Univ. Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. G.. 1977a, Z.A.M.P., 28, 577.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. G.. 1977, Proc. Roy. Soc., A358, 173.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. G. and Stewartson, K., 1977, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 81, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G.. 1975, Z.A.M.P., 26, 239.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Walton, I. C.. 1977, Proc. Roy. Soc., A358, 199.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. E. and Pal, D.. 1976, Proc 1976 Heat Transfer & Fluid Mech. Res. Inst. (Stanford Univ. Press) 117.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. E. and Pal, D.. 1978 J. Fluid Mech., 86, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matkowsky, B. J. and Reiss, E. L., 1977, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 33, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E.. 1977, J. Fluid Mech., 82, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segel, L. A.. 1969, J. Fluid Mech., 38, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar