Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:21:45.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘relaxation’ term in Debye and Hückel's theory of ionic mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. H. Paine
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

(1) The cataphoresis of ions and colloid particles is discussed in so far as it is affected by the ionic atmosphere.

(2) The ions in the atmosphere which carry a charge opposite in sign to that on the central particle are attracted to the central particle. However, when an electric field is applied to the liquid, they are able to drift away in virtue of their molecular energy, and the migration of the central particle is dependent on this fact. The relaxation force is the resultant of the forces between central particle and ions during this separation.

(3) Such a force draws the ions in the atmosphere after the central particle to some extent. From a consideration of the energy involved in the separation of particle and atmosphere, and of the molecular energies of the ions, we are able to calculate the number of ions which this relaxation force could draw through the liquid as though they were bound to the particle, and hence deduce the magnitude of the force in terms of the friction constant of the ions. The expression is the same as that given by Debye and Hückel.

(4) The cataphoresis equation usually employed for colloid particles takes no account of this relaxation force during migration. The corrected equation is given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Phys. Zeits., 24, 185 and 305 (1923).Google Scholar
(2)Phys. Zeits., 24, p. 192.Google Scholar
(3)Phys. Zeits., 24, p. 311.Google Scholar
(4)Phys. Zeits., 25, 49 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)See also Hückel, , Phys. Zeits., 25, 204 (1924).Google Scholar
(6)Phys. Zeits., 24, 316 (1923), equation 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar