Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:00:55.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Williams-Bjerknes tumour growth model: II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Maury Bramson  and
David Griffeath
Maury Bramson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota and University of Wisconsin
David Griffeath
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota and University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Williams and Bjerknes introduced in 1972 a stochastic model for the spread of cancer cells. Cells, normal and abnormal (cancerous), are situated on a planar lattice. With each cellular division, one daughter cell stays put, while the other usurps the position of a neighbour; abnormal cells reproduce at a faster rate than normal cells. We are interested in the long-term behaviour of this system. We showed in ‘On the Williams-Bjerknes Tumour Growth Model I’ (1) that, provided it lives forever, the tumour will eventually contain a ball of linearly expanding radius. Here it is shown that the rate of expansion is actually linear, and that the region of infection has an asymptotic shape which is given by some (unknown) norm. To demonstrate that the tumour contains a ball of linearly expanding radius, we applied in (1) certain techniques common to the field of interacting particle systems; in particular we made use of certain auxiliary Markov chains which are imbedded in the dual processes of our model. Here different techniques are applied. We show that the first infection times of different sites are almost subadditive, and we exhibit various regularity properties of the infection times such as bounds on their moments. These properties of the Williams-Bjerknes process allow one to follow the outline prescribed by Richardson in (7), where he showed that such a process does indeed exhibit a linear growth whose shape is prescribed by a norm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , September 1980 , pp. 339 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bramson, M. and Griffeath, D.On the Williams-Bjerknes tumour growth model: I. To appear in Annals of Probability. (1979).Google Scholar
(2)Griffeath, D.Additive and Cancellative Interacting Particle Systems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 724. (New York, Springer, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Hammersley, J.Postulates for subadditive processes, Annals of Probability 2, (1974). 652–680.Google Scholar
(4)Harris, T. E.Additive set-valued Markov processes and graphical methods. Annals of Probability 6, (1978). 355–378.Google Scholar
(5)Kesten, H. Contribution to the discussion of (6) (1973). 903.Google Scholar
(6)Kingman, J. F. C.Subadditive ergodic theory. Annals of Probability 1 (1973), 883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Richardson, D.Random growth in a tessellation, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 74, (1973), 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Schübger, K.On the asymptotic geometric behaviour of a class of contact interaction processes with a monotone infection rate, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete 48, (1979), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Williams, T. and Bjerknes, R.Stochastic model for abnormal clone spread through epithelial basal layer. Nature 236, (1972). 19–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed