Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:26:13.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discrete groups and simple C*-algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Erik Bédos
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1053, Blindern, 0316 Oslo 3, Norway

Extract

Let G denote a discrete group and let us say that G is C*-simple if the reduced group C*-algebra associated with G is simple. We notice immediately that there is no interest in considering here the full group C*-algebra associated with G, because it is simple if and only if C is trivial. Since Powers in 1975 [26] proved that all nonabelian free groups are C*-simple, the class of C*-simp1e groups has been considerably enlarged (see [1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 16, 24] as a sample!), and two important subclasses are so-called weak Powers groups ([6, 13]; see Section 4 for definition and examples) and the groups of Akemann-Lee type [1, 2], which are groups possessing a normal non-abelian free subgroup with trivial centralizer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Akemann, C. A.. Operator algebras associated with Fuchsian groups. Houston J. of Math. 7 (1981), 296301.Google Scholar
[2]Akemann, C. A. and Lee, T. Y.. Some simple algebras associated with free groups. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 29 (1980), 505511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Arveson, W.. Analicity in operator algebras. American J. of Math. 89 (1967), 578642.Google Scholar
[4]Bédos, E.. A Decomposition Theorem for Regular Extensions of Von Neumann Algebras (Preprint, University of Oslo, 1990).Google Scholar
[5]Behncke, H.. Automorphisms of crossed products. Tôhoku Math. J. 21 (1969), 580600.Google Scholar
[6]Boca, F. and Nitica, V.. Combinatorial properties of groups and simple C*-algebras with a unique trace. J. Operator Theory 20 (1988), 183196.Google Scholar
[7]Boca, F. and Nitica, V.. Extensions of Groups and Simple C*-algebras. Operator Th. Adv. and Appl. 43 (1990), 123130.Google Scholar
[8]Choda, M.. A characterization of crossed products of factors by discrete outer automorphism groups. J. Math. Soc. Japan 31 (1979), 257261.Google Scholar
[9]Dyer, J. and Formanek, E.. The automorphism group of a free group is complete. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 17 (1975), 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Dyer, J. and Grossmann, E.. The automorphism groups of the braid groups. American J. of Math. 103 (1981), 11511169.Google Scholar
[11]Elliott, G. A.. Some simple C*-algebras constructed as crossed products with discrete outer automorphisms groups. Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 16 (1980), 299311.Google Scholar
[12]Giordano, T. and Harpe, P. De la. Groupes de tresses et moyennabilité intérieure (Preprint. Institut Mittag Leffler, 1989).Google Scholar
[13]De La Harpe, P.. Reduced C*-algebras of discrete groups which are simple with a unique trace. In Operator Algebras and Their Connections With Topology and Ergodic Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1983), pp. 230253.Google Scholar
[14]De La Harpe, P.. Groupes hyperboliques, algèbres d'opérateurs et un théorème de Jolissaint. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 307 (1988), 771774.Google Scholar
[15]De La Harpe, P. and Skandalis, G.. Powers' property and simple C*-algebras. Math. Ann. 273 (1986), 241250.Google Scholar
[16]Howe, R. E. and Rosenberg, J.. The unitary representation theory of GL(n) of an infinite discrete field. Israel J. of Math. 67 (1989), 6781.Google Scholar
[17]Kallman, R. R.. A generalization of free action. Duke Math. J. 36 (1969), 781789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kishimoto, A.. Outer automorphisms and reduced crossed product of simple C*-algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 81 (1981), 429435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Longo, R.. A remark on crossed product of C*-algebras. J. London Math. Soc. 23 (1981), 531533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Mercer, R.. Convergence of Fourier series in discrete crossed products of von Neumann algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1985), 254258.Google Scholar
[21]Packer, J.. Twisted group C*-algebras corresponding to nilpotent discrete groups. Math. Scand. 64 (1989), 109122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Packer, J. and Raeburn, I.. Twisted crossed products of C*-algebras. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 106 (1989), 293311.Google Scholar
[23]Packer, J. and Raeburn, I.. On the Structure of Twisted Group C*-algebras (Preprint, 1988).Google Scholar
[24]Paschke, W. and Salinas, N.. C*-algebras associated with the free products of groups. Pacific J.Math. 82 (1979), 211221.Google Scholar
[25]Pedersen, G. K.. C*-Algebras and Their Automorphism Groups (Academic Press, 1979).Google Scholar
[26]Powers, R. T.. Simplicity of the C*-algebras associated with the free group on two generators. Duke Math. J. 42 (1975), 151156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Quigg, J. C.. Duality for reduced twisted crossed products of C*-algebras. Indiana Univ. J. 35 (1986), 549571.Google Scholar
[28]Stratila, S.. Modular Theory in Operator Algebras (Editira Academici – Abacus Press, 1981).Google Scholar
[29]Takesaki, M.. On the cross-norms of the direct product of C*-algebras. Tôhoko Math. J. 16 (1964), 111122.Google Scholar
[30]Takesaki, M.. Theory of Operator Algebras. I (Springer Verlag, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Wielandt, H.. Eine Verallgemeinerung der invarianten Untergruppen. Math. Z. 45 (1939), 209244.Google Scholar
[32]Zeller-Meier, G.. Produits croises d'une C*-algebre par un groupe d'automorphismes. J. Math. Pure et Appl. 47 (1968), 101239.Google Scholar