Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:41:59.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spherical splitting of 3-orbifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2007

CARLO PETRONIO
CARLO PETRONIO*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata, Università di Pisa, Via Filippo Buonarroti, 1G, I-56127, PISA, Italy. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The famous Haken–Kneser–Milnor theorem states that every 3-manifold can be expressed in a unique way as a connected sum of prime 3-manifolds. The analogous statement for 3-orbifolds has been part of the folklore for several years, and it was commonly believed that slight variations on the argument used for manifolds would be sufficient to establish it. We demonstrate in this paper that this is not the case, proving that the apparently natural notion of “essential” system of spherical 2-orbifolds is not adequate in this context. We also show that the statement itself of the theorem must be given in a substantially different way. We then prove the theorem in full detail, using a certain notion of “efficient splitting system.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 142 , Issue 2 , March 2007 , pp. 269 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Boileau, M., Leeb, B. and Porti, J.. Geometrization of 3-dimensional orbifolds, math.GT/0010184.Google Scholar
[2] Boileau, M., Maillot, S. and Porti, J.. Three-dimensional orbifolds and their geometric structures. Panor. Synthès. 15 (2003).Google Scholar
[3] Bonahon, F. and Siebenmann, L.. The characteristic toric splitting of irreducible compact 3-orbifolds. Math. Ann. 278 (1987), 441–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Hempel, J.. 3-Manifolds. Ann. of Math. Stud. 86 (1976).Google Scholar
[5] Cooper, D., Hodgson, C. and Kerkhoff, S.. Three-dimensional orbifolds and cone-manifolds. MSJ Mem. 5 (2000).Google Scholar
[6] Martelli, B.. Complexity of 3-manifolds, math.GT/0405250.Google Scholar
[7] Matveev, S. V.. Complexity theory of three-dimensional manifolds. Acta Appl. Math. 19 (1990), 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Matveev, S. V.. Algorithmic topology and classification of 3-manifolds. Algorithms Comput. Math. 9 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Perelman, G.. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds, math.DG/0303109.Google Scholar
[10] Petronio, C.. Complexity of 3-orbifolds. To appear in Topology Appl.Google Scholar
[11] Takeuchi, Y. and Yokoyama, M.. The realization of the decompositions of the 3-orbifold groups along the spherical 2-orbifold groups. Topology Appl. 124 (2002), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Thurston, W. P.. The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds. Mimeographed notes (Princeton, 1979).Google Scholar