Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
There is a theorem for three circles in a plane, that if three tangents, each of two of these circles, either all transverse or one transverse and two direct, can be drawn to meet in a point, then the three tangents, each of two of the circles, respectively conjugate to those first taken, likewise meet in a point. The theorem was stated by Quidde, with a proof for the necessity of the condition as to the tangents to be taken, in a paper designed to establish Steiner's solution of Malfatti's problem. Casey gives the theorem with omission of the condition for the character of the tangents, as does Salmon, who, however, gives a proof depending on the right choice of certain square roots which enter. Quidde's theorem is stated, accurately, in the Nouvelles Annales, and a simple metrical proof, from the diagram drawn (essentially Quidde's, see 6 below) is given later in the same Journal by Mannheim; this is practically repeated by Hart. Recently, Prof. Neville, emphasizing the necessity of the condition for the character of the tangents, has called attention to Quidde's paper.
* Quidde, A., Archiv der Math. u. Phys. 15 (1850), 197–204.Google Scholar
† Steiner, J., Journal f. Math. 1 (1826), 161–84Google Scholar (183, Aufgabe 18); Gesammelte Werke, 1, 39.
‡ Casey, J., Sequel to Euclid, 5th edition (1888), p. 521Google Scholar, Ex. 48.
§ Salmon, G., Treatise on conic sections, 6th edition (1879), p. 263Google Scholar, Ex. 2.
∥ Quidde, A., Nouv. Ann. de Math. 11 (1852), 313Google Scholar (No. 255).
¶ A. Mannheim, ibid. 13 (1854), 210.
** Hart, A. S., Quart. J. of Math. 1 (1857), 219.Google Scholar
†† Neville, E. H., Math. Gazette, 15 (1930), 134 and 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‡‡ J. Steiner, loc. cit.
§§ Baker, H. F., Principles of Geometry, 4 (1925), 67Google Scholar, Ex. 7.
Poncelet, J. V., Propriétés projectives (1822), p. 389Google Scholar, or, in the edition of 1865, 1, 378, § 606.
* Mannheim, A., Nouv. Ann. 13 (1854), 211.Google Scholar
* Coll. Papers, 2, 77.
† Ges. Werke, 1, 39Google Scholar, Aufg. 18.
‡ Proc. Land. Math. Soc. (2), 30 (1930), 287.Google Scholar