Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:02:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized basic hypergeometric series with unconnected bases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. P. Agarwal  and
Arun Verma
R. P. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Lucknow University, India
Arun Verma
Affiliation:
Lucknow University, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a series of recent papers Verma and Upadhyay (7,8,9) developed the theory of basic hypergeometric series with two bases q and q½. These investigations were made in an attempt to discover a summation formula for a bilateral basic hypergeometric series 2Ψ2 analogous to that for a 2H2 (cf. Bailey (2,3)) and in finding relations between certain q-infinite products. In one of their papers they mentioned that it did not seem possible to develop the corresponding general theory for basic series with two unconnected bases q and q1. A recent paper by Andrews (1) indicates that transformations between basic hypergeometric series with two unconnected bases can be very interesting and useful in the study of ‘mock’ theta functions and their extensions. Besides this interest, such a theory also enables one to extend the entire existing transformation theory of the generalized basic hypergeometric series.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , July 1967 , pp. 727 - 734
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Andrews, G. E.On basic hypergeometric series, mock theta functions and partitions (I). Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2), 17 (1966), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bailey, W. N.Series of hypergeometric type which are infinite in both directions. Quart. J. Math. Oxford 7 (1936), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Bailey, W. N.On the basic bilateral hypergeometric series 2Ψ2 Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2), 1 (1950), 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Sears, D. B.Transformation theory of basic hypergeometric series of any order. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 53 (1951), 158–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Slater, L. J.Integrals representing general hypergeometric functions. Quart. J. Math. Ser. Oxford (2), 3 (1952), 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Slater, L. J.An integral of the hypergeometric type. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 48 (1952), 578–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Verma, A. Certain transformations of products of basic hypergeometric series. (Communicated for publication.)Google Scholar
(8)Verma, A. and Upadhyay, M. Certain transformations of products of basic bilateral hypergeometric series. (Communicated for publication.)Google Scholar
(9)Verma, A. and Upadhyay, M. Transformations of basic bilateral hypergeometic series. (Communicated for publication.)Google Scholar