Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:18:39.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cohomology and projectivity of modules for finite group schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2001

CHRISTOPHER P. BENDEL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Let G be a finite group scheme over a field k, that is, an affine group scheme whose coordinate ring k[G] is finite dimensional. The dual algebra k[G]* ≡ Homk(k[G], k) is then a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra. Indeed, there is an equivalence of categories between finite group schemes and finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras (cf. [19]). Further the representation theory of G is equivalent to that of k[G]*. Many familiar objects can be considered in this context. For example, any finite group G can be considered as a finite group scheme. In this case, the algebra k[G]* is simply the group algebra kG. Over a field of characteristic p > 0, the restricted enveloping algebra u([gfr ]) of a p-restricted Lie algebra [gfr ] is a finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebra. Also, the mod-p Steenrod algebra is graded cocommutative so that some finite dimensional Hopf subalgebras are such algebras.

Over the past thirty years, there has been extensive study of the modular representation theory (i.e. over a field of positive characteristic p > 0) of such algebras, particularly in regards to understanding cohomology and determining projectivity of modules. This paper is primarily interested in the following two questions:

Questions1·1. Let G be a finite group scheme G over a field k of characteristic p > 0, and let M be a rational G-module.

(a) Does there exist a family of subgroup schemes of G which detects whether M is projective?

(b) Does there exist a family of subgroup schemes of G which detects whether a cohomology class z ∈ ExtnG(M, M) (for M finite dimensional) is nilpotent?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)