Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:46:51.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compartmental Models of Migratory Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2011

J. Knisley*
Affiliation:
The Institute for Quantitative Biology, East Tennessee State University Mathematics and Statistics, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
T. Schmickl
Affiliation:
Artificial Life Lab of the Department of Zoology, Karl-Franzens-University
I. Karsai
Affiliation:
The Institute for Quantitative Biology, East Tennessee State University Biological Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Compartmentalization is a general principle in biological systems which is observable on all size scales, ranging from organelles inside of cells, cells in histology, and up to the level of groups, herds, swarms, meta-populations, and populations. Compartmental models are often used to model such phenomena, but such models can be both highly nonlinear and difficult to work with.

Fortunately, there are many significant biological systems that are amenable to linear compartmental models which are often more mathematically accessible. Moreover, the biology and mathematics is often so intertwined in such models that one can be used to better understand the other. Indeed, as we demonstrate in this paper, linear compartmental models of migratory dynamics can be used as an exciting and interactive means of introducing sophisticated mathematics, and conversely, the associated mathematics can be used to demonstrate important biological properties not only of seasonal migrations but also of compartmental models in general.

We have found this approach to be of great value in introducing derivatives, integrals, and the fundamental theorem of calculus. Additionally, these models are appropriate as applications in a differential equations course, and they can also be used to illustrate important ideas in probability and statistics, such as the Poisson distribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allarakhia, M., Wensley, A.. Systems biology: melting the boundaries in drug discovery research. Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries, (2005), 262274. Google Scholar
L. Allen. An Introduction to mathematical biology, Pearson, New York, 2007.
Bauer, S., Barta, Z., Ens, B., Hays, G., McNamara, J., Klassen, M.. Animal migration: linking models and data beyond taxonomic limits. Biol. Lett., 5 (2009), No. 4, 433435. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, R.. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 8 (1977), 25593. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialek, W., Botstein, D.. Introductory science and mathematics education for the 21th century biologists. Science, 303 (2004), 788790. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Bower. Looking for Newton: realistic modeling in modern biology. Brains, Minds and Media, 1 (2005), bmm217 (urn:nbn:de:0009-3-2177).
Buonaccorsi, V., Skibiel, A.. A striking demonstration of the Poisson distribution. Teach. Stat, 27 (2005), 8-10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobelli, C.. Modeling and identification of endocrine-metabolic systems. Theoretical aspects and their importance in practice. Math. Biosci., 72 (1984), 263289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Cohen. Mathematics Is Biology’s Next Microscope, Only Better; Biology Is Mathematics’ Next Physics, Only Better. PLoS Biol., 2 (2004), e439. Published online 2004 December 14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020439.
J. Crow and M. Kimura. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
M. Evans, N. Hastings, B. Peacock. Erlang distribution. Ch. 12 in Statistical Distributions, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 2000, 71–73.
A. Ford. Modeling the environment. Island Press, 2010.
Granta, W., Matisb, J., and Millerb, T.. A Stochastic Compartmental Model for Migration of Marine Shrimp. Ecological Modeling, 54 (1991), 115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, L.. Quantitative training for life science students. BioScience, 44 (1994), 59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, P.. Frequency distributions in population genetics parallel those in statistical physics. Physical Review E, (1995), No. 51, 95101. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
W. Hwang, Y. Cho, A. Zhang, M. Ramanathan. A novel functional module detection algorithm for protein-protein interaction networks. Algorithms for Molecular Biology (2006), No. 2, 24, doi:10.1186/1748-7188-1-24.
J. Jacquez. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine, 3rd ed., Biomedware, Ann Arbor, MI, 1996.
Karsai, I., Kampis, G.. The crossroad between biology and mathematics: Scientific method as the basics of scientific literacy. BioScience, 60 (2010), 632638. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Knisley. Netlogo Migration Simulations, http://math.etsu.edu/symbiosis/migrations, (2011).
J. Knisley, I. Karsai, A. Godbole, M. Helfgott, K. Joplin, E. Seier, D. Moore, H. Miller. Storytelling in the Symbiosis Project. To appear in Undergraduate Mathematics for the Life Sciences: Processes, Models, Assessment, and Directions, MAA Lecture Notes, 2010.
Knisley, J.. A 4-Stage Model of Mathematical Learning. The Mathematics Educator, 12 (2002), No. 1, 1116. Google Scholar
D. Lauffenburger. Receptors. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
Malice, M., Lefevre, C.. On Linear Stochastic Compartmental Models in Discrete Time. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 47 (1985), No. 2, 287293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. Moore, M. Helfgott, A. Godbole, K. Joplin, I. Karsai, J. Knisley, H. Miller, E. Seier. Creating Quantitative Biologists: The Immediate Future of SYMBIOSIS. To appear in Undergraduate Mathematics for the Life Sciences: Processes, Models, Assessment, and Directions, MAA Lecture Notes, 2010.
J. Murray. Mathematical Biology. Springer, New York, 1989.
Reed, W., Hughes, B.. Theoretical size distribution of fossil taxa: analysis of a null model. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modeling, 4 (2007), 12, doi:10.1186/1742-4682-4-12 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
L. Steen, ed. Math & Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 2005.
Usher, D., Driscoll, T., Dhurjati, P., Pelesko, J., Rossi, L., Schleiniger, G., Pusecker, K., White, H.. A transformative model for undergraduate quantitative biology education. CBE Life Sci Educ., 9 (2010), No. 3, 181188. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, D., Rechisky, E., Melnychuk, M., Porter, A., Walters, C.. Survival of Migrating Salmon Smolts in Large Rivers With and Without Dams. PLoS Biol, 6 (2008), No. 10, e265. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060265. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U. Wilensky. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL, (1999).