Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:14:36.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micro Epitaxial lateral overgrowth of GaN/sapphire by Metal Organic Vapour Phase Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

E. Frayssinet
Affiliation:
Lumilog, 2720, Chemin de Saint Bernard, Les Moulins I, 06220 Vallauris, FRANCE
B. Beaumont
Affiliation:
Lumilog, 2720, Chemin de Saint Bernard, Les Moulins I, 06220 Vallauris, FRANCE
J. P. Faurie
Affiliation:
Lumilog, 2720, Chemin de Saint Bernard, Les Moulins I, 06220 Vallauris, FRANCE
Pierre Gibart
Affiliation:
Lumilog, 2720, Chemin de Saint Bernard, Les Moulins I, 06220 Vallauris, FRANCE
Zs. Makkai
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Technical Physics and Matl. Sci., H-1525 Budapest, POBox 49
B. Pécz
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Technical Physics and Matl. Sci., H-1525 Budapest, POBox 49
P. Lefebvre
Affiliation:
Groupe d’Etude des Semiconducteurs, GES-CNRS
P. Valvin
Affiliation:
Groupe d’Etude des Semiconducteurs, GES-CNRS

Abstract

GaN/sapphire layers have been grown by Metal Organic Vapour Phase Epitaxy (MOVPE). An amorphous silicon nitride layer is deposited using a SiH4/NH3 mixture prior to the growth of the low temperature GaN buffer layer. Such a process induces a 3D nucleation at the early beginning of the growth, resulting in a kind of maskless ELO process with random opening sizes. This produces a significant decrease of the threading dislocation (TD) density compared to the best GaN/sapphire templates. Ultra Low Dislocation density (ULD) GaN layers were obtained with TD density as low as 7×107cm−2 as measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM), cathodoluminescence and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Time-resolved photoluminescence experiments show that the lifetime of the A free exciton is principally limited by capture onto residual donors, similar to the situation for nearly dislocation-free homoepitaxial layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Materials Research Society

1. Introduction

The III-V compound semiconductor family has proven high performance in high-speed electronics, optical emitters, (i.e. laser diodes (LDs) and light emitting diodes (LEDs)) and detectors. However, for efficient operation, high crystalline quality is required. Growth technologies for large-scale substrates are currently very advanced for Si (and to a lesser extent, GaAs) and less advanced for InP and other III-V substrates. For GaN, bulk crystals are not readily available. Bulk GaN is intrinsically very difficult to grow because of the high vapour pressure of nitrogen at the melting point of GaN. GaN single crystals (about 1 cm2) are, however, produced by high temperature and high-pressure growth, mainly at UNIPRESS (Poland). Reference Grzegory and Porowski[1]

Even though these crystals are very valuable for basic physics and demonstration of ultimate performance of devices, their size and potential production volume do not come close to meeting industrial needs.

Since there is no GaN bulk single crystal available, the entire technological development of GaN based devices relies on heteroepitaxy. GaN is currently grown epitaxially by MOVPE, Halide Vapour Phase Epitaxy (HVPE) and Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE). Most of the current device structures are grown on sapphire or 6H-SiC. Potentially more appropriate substrates like LiAlO2, MgAl2O4, ScMgAlO4, 6H-SiC, ZnO and Hf have been tested in several laboratories. Reference Liu and Edgar[2]

Even though good quality GaN epilayers have been obtained, none have been significantly better than GaN/sapphire layers. The use of alternative substrates has therefore not yet solved the problem of obtaining a suitable substrate.

The lattice parameters and the thermal expansion coefficients of sapphire and SiC are not well matched to GaN. The epitaxial growth of GaN on these substrates therefore generates huge densities of dislocations (109 to 1011cm−2). These dislocations propagate up to the surface to have an adverse effect on the performance of optical and electronic devices. Using appropriate nucleation layers reduces the dislocation density down to the mid 108cm−2 range. LDs were demonstrated in the late nineties with such defective layers. The real breakthrough in laser technology was the dramatic improvement of the laser diode lifetime at the end of 1997 Reference Nakamura, Senoh, Nagahama, Iwasa, Yamada, Matsushita, Kiyoku, Sugimoto, Kozaki, Umemoto, Sano and Chocho[3] which reached up to 10000 hours. This was made possible with the implementation of epitaxial lateral overgrowth technology (ELO), which significantly reduces the dislocations density. Reference Beaumont, Vennéguès and Gibart[4] Even though ELO technology leads to outstanding increases in the lifetime of LDs, the ELO structure with its array of coalescence boundaries makes LD technology difficult. ELO technology also involves photolithographic steps that are time consuming and relatively expensive. It would be of great interest to keep the advantages of ELO without the requirement of making a mask on a GaN epitaxial layer by photolithography.

In previous papers Reference Haffouz, Lahrèche, Vennéguès, Beaumont, Omnès and Gibart[5] Reference Vennegues, Beaumont, Haffouz, Vaille and Gibart[6] Reference Haffouz, Beaumont and Gibart[7] Reference Lahreche, Vennegues, Beaumont and Gibart[8] Reference Haffouz, Beaumont, Vénnègues and Gibart[9] Reference Haffouz, Beaumont, Vennéguès and Gibart[10], we have shown that the treatment of the sapphire substrate by a mixture of silane + ammonia (hereafter called Si/N treatment) induces a three dimensional growth mode at the first stage of the epitaxy of GaN, thus reducing the dislocation density down to the mid 108cm−2 range. This process has been significantly improved and currently led to TD density below 108cm−2. In depth characterisations have shown that indeed the Si/N treatment induces a non uniform SiN coverage, thus acting as micro mask.

2. Experimental

2.1 3D growth mode

GaN growth by the two-dimensional growth mode has been made possible by the nitridation of the sapphire surface and by the two-step process. Reference Amano, Sawaki, Akasaki and Toyoda[11] Basically, the growth conditions have been optimized in order to obtain a continuous coverage of the substrate by the GaN nucleation layer (NL) and thereby producing flat GaN films at high temperature. This growth process however, leads to high defect densities (~1010 dislocations/cm2) and therefore better quality material is needed to achieve high performance and reliable devices.

By essentially using the epitaxial overgrowth principle, i.e. involving localized but maskless lateral overgrowth, a new growth process, referred to as the “3D growth process”, has been implemented to obtain better quality GaN materials. Silicon has been reported to act as a “antisurfactant”, i.e. it plays an important role in changing the growth mode from 2D to 3D. Reference Tanaka, Iwai and Aoyagi[12] Reference Shen, Tanaka, Iwai and Aoyagi[13] Reference Nakamura, Senoh, Nagahama, Iwasa, Yamada, Matsushita, Kiyoku, Sugimoto, Kozaki, Umemoto, Sano and Chocho[3] Using this antisurfactant effect of silicon, GaN quantum dots on AlxGa1−xN surfaces have been realized by MOVPE. Reference Tanaka, Iwai and Aoyagi[12]

The exposure of the sapphire substrate prior to the deposition of a GaN NL under simultaneous silane and ammonia flows fundamentally influences the quality of GaN epilayers grown by MOVPE. This step of the growth process will be referred to as “Si/N treatment”. Reference Vennegues, Beaumont, Haffouz, Vaille and Gibart[6] Reference Haffouz, Beaumont, Vénnègues and Gibart[9] The NL is deposited between 500 and 600°C. During the annealing up to 1080°C of this NL, the Si/N process induces a dramatic morphological change of the GaN NL from a flat layer fully capping the substrate to a high density of 3D GaN islands (200-400 nm large and 100−200nm high) surrounded by the bare sapphire substrate (see Figure 1(a)).

Figure 1a. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 180 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 1×109 cm−2.

Figure 1b. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 300 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 5×108 cm−2.

Figure 1c. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 480 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 3×108 cm−2.

Figure 1d. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 720 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 1×108 cm−2.

It has been observed that two parameters are of critical importance to induce the 3D growth process:

  1. 1. the composition of the carrier gas (N2 or N2+H2) and

  2. 2. the duration of the Si/N treatment. Reference Vennegues, Beaumont, Haffouz, Vaille and Gibart[6] Reference Haffouz, Beaumont, Vénnègues and Gibart[9]

The GaN island formation is achievable only when H2 is present in the carrier gas. H2 seems to act as a “morphactant” as Eaglesham et al. Reference Eaglesham, Unterwald and Jacobson[14] called impurities which favoured particular equilibrium shapes of islands. Recent studies Reference Han, Ng, Biefeld, Crawford and Follstaedt[15] have also reported that the appearance of islands is strongly related to the H2 concentration in the growth chamber.

GaN epilayers grown following this process show X-ray rocking curves with FWHM in the 180-360 arcsec range (for asymmetric reflections). Hall electron mobility in the 500-700 cm2/V.s range at 300K, with background carrier concentration in the low 1016cm−3, were obtained for GaN films grown with an adequate Si/N treatment time. When measuring the PL intensity of 3D GaN layers, an increase in the intensity by a factor of about 20 is observed as compared to the 2D-growth mode. This gain in radiative efficiency is well correlated to the decrease by a factor of about 50 in the dislocation density, thus confirming the non-radiative recombination nature of some of the dislocations in GaN. Reference Rosner, Carr, Ludowise, Girolami and Erikson[16] Reference Sugahara, Sato, Hao, Naoi, Kurai, Tottori, Yamashita, Nishino, Romano and Sakai[17] This Si/N treatment at the early stage of the growth was subsequently implemented by other groups and led to TD density in the low 108cm−2 range. Reference Haffouz, Kirilyuk, Hageman, Macht, Weyher and Larsen[18] Reference Sakai, Wang, Morishima, Naoi and Crystal Growth[19]

2.2 Improvement of the Si/N treatment

The density of defects in material grown with a 3D mode was recently reduced down to the mid 107cm−2 range as measured by atomic force microscopy by an improved Si/N treatment. Growth experiments were carried out in a 3×2″ low pressure MOVPE reactor using Trimethyl gallium (TMG) (308µmole/min) as gallium source, and ammonia for providing N, a V/III ratio of 1305 and H2 as carrier gas. After the Si/N treatment, a GaN nucleation layer was deposited at 525°C. The NL was then annealed at the growth temperature at 1000°C, and afterwards growth proceeded. As described and analyzed in previous papers, Reference Haffouz, Beaumont, Vénnègues and Gibart[9] the whole growth process is monitored in real time by in situ laser reflectometry, Figure 2. In short, the nucleation layer deposited at low temperature on the Si/N treated sapphire surface experienced a 2D-3D transition; this therefore increases the diffuse scattering of the laser beam and results in a continuous decrease of the reflectivity. Afterwards, the growth of GaN proceeds from the islands by lateral and vertical expansion to coalescence. These two stages correspond to the profound dip in the reflectivity and to the subsequent recovering of the reflectivity level, respectively. In the improved Si/N treatment, the duration of the supply of SiH4 and NH3 lasts 360 sec. During the growth of this kind of samples, the full recovery of the reflectivity takes about 4 hours. The AFM scan of Figure 1 shows the size of islands for different Si/N treatment durations. These islands are formed after deposition of amorphous SiN from SiH4/NH3 on the sapphire substrate, low temperature deposition of the GaN nucleation layer and then annealing at the growth temperature. As expected, the size of the 3D nuclei increases with the deposition time of SiN. However, it cannot significantly increase beyond the actual value; otherwise the recovery time would be too long to obtain layers without pits. Nethertheless, such pitted layers exhibit a dislocation density in the low 107cm−2(<4×107cm−2)

Figure 2. Comparison between reflectivity spectra recorded during the growth of GaN/sapphire standard epilayer and Ultra Low dislocation (ULD) GaN/sapphire. Arrows indicate where the growth starts.

Delaying the coalescence has been recently achieved using a different approach, Reference Sakai, Wang, Morishima, Naoi and Crystal Growth[19] Reference Figge, Böttcher, Einfeldt, Hommel and Growth[20]. Tuning the V/III ratio was used to control the coalescence of the island nucleation; TD densities of 1.5×108cm−2 have been reported. Reference Barna[21]

The TD densities of the thick ULD GaN layers grown onto the nucleation layers shown in Figure 1(c) were determined by AFM scan and cathodoluminescence. Both methods give 7×107cm−2.

3. In depth characterisation

3.1 High resolution transmission electron microscopy

Transparent specimens for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) were prepared by low angle ion milling Reference Barna[21] using Ar+ bombardment at 10 kV. The energy of the impinging Ar+ ions was decreased to 3 keV after perforation and even further down to 500 eV in order to minimize ion beam damages. The specimens were investigated in a JEOL 3010 UMR microscope operating at 300 kV. High resolution images reveal that there is an amorphous region between GaN and sapphire, most likely SiN, (EDS shows some silicon). However, the amorphous material at the interface is a discontinuous layer. Indeed, the interface SiN layer is build of grains (20 nm height and 20-40 nm long). In figure 3 two small amorphous inclusions inside the GaN layer at the interface are seen. Actually the amorphous SiN layer acts as a micro mask, thereby leading to an ELO process at the micrometer scale.

Figure 3. High Resolution image of the interface in a ULD GaN/sapphire sample.

The amorphous nature of the SiN discontinuous layer can be seen clearly. Indeed, the SiN layer acts as randomly distributed (in size and in location) openings, thereby inducing a lateral overgrowth process. The GaN layer over these “masks” is hexagonal and follows the usual epitaxial relationship to sapphire (30° rotation around the 0001 axis). Sometimes the cubic sequence is also observed in grains of the NL between two SiN “inclusions” (Figure 3). However, these regions are also overgrown by hexagonal GaN. As further proof of the occurrence of an ELO mechanism, bending of threading dislocation occurs in this micro-ELO process as shown in Figure 4. More precisely, Figure 4 shows two TDs which propagate horizontally after bending.

Figure 4. Cross-sectional bright field image of the ULD GaN/sapphire sample showing the interface region. The arrow indicates the SiN coverage.

Plan view samples of the top region of GaN were also prepared for TEM. Dislocation density was determined and value of 6×107cm−2 was obtained. As AFM probes a larger area, the value of 7×107cm−2 determined by AFM measurement is in good agreement with TEM data.

3.2 Photoluminescence

Figure 5 displays the near band gap low temperature PL spectra of GaN/sapphire grown following the present technology. The PL spectrum is dominated by the so-called I2 line, assigned to the donor-bound exciton, lying ~6 meV below the PL from the 1s-state of the free exciton with hole in the A valence band (XA). This assignment is confirmed by the reversal of intensity between these two lines above T = 40 K, due to thermal escape of excitons from the donor traps. The positions of the XA and XB lines prove that the layers are under biaxial compression Reference Gil, Hamdani and Morkoc[22] thus pushing the XCexciton towards much higher energies. The line at 3.512 eV is then assigned to the 2s state of the A exciton. The fluctuations of the strain are certainly at the origin of the present broadening of the lines. Nevertheless, apart from the broadening, this spectrum contains many of the features that are usually observed for high-quality homoepitaxial GaN layers Reference Kornitzer, Ebner, Grehl, Thonke, Sauer, Kirchner, Schwegler, Kamp, Leszczynski, Grzegory and Porowski[23], Reference Korona[24], including the two-electron satellite of the donor-bound exciton red-shifted from the I2 line by exactly the same amount (21.6 meV) as for the homoepitaxial layers of Ref.  Reference Korona[24]. These observations are further proof of the high quality of the layer.

Figure 5. Near band gap low temperature photoluninescence of ULD GaN/sapphire

3.3 Time-resolved PL

The recombination dynamics of excess carriers in group III-nitrides is a key issue for the optimization of blue-light emitting diodes and laser diodes devices based on nitrides. Therefore, the relationships between growth parameters of GaN and optoelectronic properties are of critical importance. The recombination dynamics of GaN have been widely studied by several groups and reviewed in ref Reference Im, Moritz, Steuber, Haerle, Scholz and Hangleiter[25]. The main features are the following:

All fast decay times have been unanimously assigned to parasitic non-radiative processes. Similar results have been reported for the I2 line. Decay times of ~50-260 ps Reference Harris, Monemar, Amano and Akasaki[26] Reference Chen, Smith, Lin, Jiang, Asif Khan and Sun[27] Reference Shan, Schmidt, Yang, Song and Goldenberg[28] Reference Hangleiter, Im, Forner, Härle and Scholz[29] Reference Okada, Yamada, Tagushi, Sasaki, Kobayashi, Tani, Nakamura and Shinomiya[30] Reference Kawakami, Peng, Narukawa, Fujita, Fujita and Nakamura[31] Reference Meyer, Volm, Wetzel, Eckey, Holst, Maxim, Heitz, Hoffmann, Broser, Mokhov, Baranov and Qiu[32] Reference Eckey, Heitz, Hoffmann, Broser, Meyer, Hiramitsu, Detchprohm, Amano and Akasaki[33] Reference Bergman, Monemar, Amano, Akasaki, Hiramatsu, Sawaki and Detchprohm[34] have been reported for MOCVD and decay times of up to ~600 ps have been reported for the best MBE-grown layers. While convincing attempts have been made to correlate fast decays to various parameters such as the intensity of the low-energy “yellow luminescence” Reference Okada, Yamada, Tagushi, Sasaki, Kobayashi, Tani, Nakamura and Shinomiya[30] Reference Song, Shan, Schmidt, Yang, Fisher, Hwang, Taheri, Goldenberg, Horning, Salvador, Kim, Atkas, Botchkarev and Morkoç[40] or the presence of defects near the substrate-layer interface Reference Buneau, Herzog, Ünlü, Goldberg and Molnar[35], up to now, no significant attempt to reach a limit close to the high value reported in MBE has been done using standard MOVPE.

Figure 6 shows the PL decays recorded on an ULD layer, at T = 13 K, on a time-scale of ~5 ns. The I2 line exhibits a nonexponential decay with initial decay time of ~0.17 ns, followed by a much slower and exponential decay, with time constant of 1.06 ns. This result is totally comparable to that obtained on homoepitaxial (dislocation-free) GaN layers. Reference Im, Moritz, Steuber, Haerle, Scholz and Hangleiter[25] From the interpretation in Ref.  Reference Im, Moritz, Steuber, Haerle, Scholz and Hangleiter[25], the slow decay is the intrinsic lifetime of the donor-bound exciton, but at short delays the recombination rate is enhanced by interaction of bound excitons with free ones. Even more remarkably, the decay dynamics of the XA line starts with a rather fast exponential decay, with ô ~ 0.08 ns, again comparable to the homoepitaxy of Ref.  Reference Korona[24] but clearly with a long-lived component. The latter could not have been be observed if the decay was merely controlled by exciton trapping at nonradiative defects, as it is usually the case for lower-quality epitaxial layers. Instead, we believe that this slow decay may correspond to re-absorption phenomena, or rather, to the exciton-polariton nature of the recombining entity. This type of property can only be observed for high-quality samples, for which the nonradiative lifetime is much larger than the radiative lifetime. The figure also shows the fast decays recorded for the XB line and for the 2s state of XA.

Figure 6. Decays of the free-excitons and I2 PL intensities recorded at 13K

Experiments performed using a smaller time window (1 ns) have allowed us to confirm the assignment of the lines: after the excitation laser pulse, the first line reaching its maximum intensity is the XB line. Then, 28 ps later, the XA line and the higher energy line simultaneously reach their maximum, thus confirming the assignment to the 2s state of the XA exciton. Finally, due to an evident transfer mechanism commented on in previous works, Reference Im, Moritz, Steuber, Haerle, Scholz and Hangleiter[25] the I2 line reaches its maximum, with a delay of 42 ps from the XA line. This delay rapidly drops near zero when the temperature is raised to ~ 40 K.

4. Discussion

Experiments reveal two basic features about the role of the SiN layer. First, as already evidenced in previous papers, the occurrence of Si at the sapphire/GaN interface produces an “antisurfactant” effect, thereby inducing a 3D nucleation. After 3D nucleation, growth proceeds laterally from {1

01} facets until full coalescence. In addition there is at some stage of the process a spontaneous formation of micrograins as shown in HRTEM pictures. This then creates a kind of mask with randomly distributed sizes of openings. Bending of TDs at 90° is observed, this is a well known feature in ELO when the lateral overgrowth is initiated from triangular stripes or pyramids.

5. Conclusion

Improvement of the Si/N process results in GaN/sapphire templates with TD densities as low as 7×107cm−2. The FWHM of the near band gap PL recombination peak is lower than 2 meV. Time-resolved photoluminescence experiments show that the lifetime of the A free exciton is principally limited by capture onto residual donors, similar to the situation for nearly dislocation-free homoepitaxial layers.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported by EU under contract EURONIM G5RD-CT-2001-00470. The authors wish to thank Dr. M. Leroux for helpful advices.

References

Grzegory, I. and Porowski, S., Thin Solid Films,367, 281(2000) (The title must be entered, and surrounded by quote marks.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. and Edgar, J.H., Mat. Sci. Eng. Rep. R37, 61 (2002) (The title must be entered, and surrounded by quote marks.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S, Senoh, M, Nagahama, S, Iwasa, N, Yamada, T, Matsushita, T, Kiyoku, H, Sugimoto, Y, Kozaki, T, Umemoto, H, Sano, M, Chocho, K, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 211-213 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, B., Vennéguès, Ph., Gibart, P., Phys. Stat. Sol. B 227, 1-43 (2001).3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffouz, S., Lahrèche, H., Vennéguès, P., Beaumont, B., Omnès, F., Gibart, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1278 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennegues, P., Beaumont, B., Haffouz, S., Vaille, M., Gibart, P., J. Cryst. Growth 187, 167 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffouz, S., Beaumont, B., Gibart, Pierre, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 3, 8 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahreche, H., Vennegues, P., Beaumont, B., Gibart, P., J. Cryst. Growth 205, 245 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffouz, S., Beaumont, B., Vénnègues, P., Gibart, P., Phys. Stat. Sol. A 176, 677 (1999).3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffouz, S., Beaumont, B., Vennéguès, P., Gibart, P., unpublished (2002).Google Scholar
Amano, H, Sawaki, N., Akasaki, I., Toyoda, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 353 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, S, Iwai, S, Aoyagi, Y, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4096-4098 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, XQ, Tanaka, S, Iwai, S, Aoyagi, Y, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 344-346 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaglesham, D. J., Unterwald, F. C., Jacobson, D. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 966 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Ng, T. -B., Biefeld, R. M., Crawford, M. H., Follstaedt, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3114 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, SJ, Carr, EC, Ludowise, MJ, Girolami, G, Erikson, HI, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 420-422 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugahara, T, Sato, H, Hao, M, Naoi, Y, Kurai, S, Tottori, S, Yamashita, K, Nishino, K, Romano, LT, Sakai, S, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, L398 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffouz, S., Kirilyuk, V., Hageman, P. R., Macht, L., Weyher, J. L., Larsen, P. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2390-2392 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, S., Wang, T., Morishima, Y. and Naoi, Y., Crystal Growth, J., 221, 334-337 (2000) (The title must be entered, and surrounded by quote marks.)Google Scholar
Figge, S., Böttcher, T., Einfeldt, S. and Hommel, D., Growth, J. Cryst., 221, 262 (2000) (The title must be entered, and surrounded by quote marks.)Google Scholar
Barna, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 254, 3-22 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, B, Hamdani, F, Morkoc, H, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7678-7681 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornitzer, K., Ebner, T., Grehl, M., Thonke, K., Sauer, R, Kirchner, C., Schwegler, V., Kamp, M., Leszczynski, M., Grzegory, I., Porowski, S., Phys. Stat. Sol. B 216, 5 (1999).3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korona, K. P., Phys. Rev. B 65, 235312 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, J.S., Moritz, A., Steuber, F., Haerle, V., Scholz, F., Hangleiter, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 631-633 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. I., Monemar, B., Amano, H., Akasaki, I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 840-842 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. D., Smith, M., Lin, J. Y., Jiang, H. X., Asif Khan, M., Sun, C. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1653-1655 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, W., Schmidt, T., Yang, X. H., Song, J. J., Goldenberg, B., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3691-3696 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hangleiter, A, Im, JS, Forner, T, Härle, V, Scholz, F, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 395, 559 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, K, Yamada, Y, Tagushi, T, Sasaki, F, Kobayashi, S, Tani, T, Nakamura, S, Shinomiya, G, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, L787 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawakami, Y, Peng, ZG, Narukawa, Y, Fujita, S, Fujita, S, Nakamura, S, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1414-1416 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, BK, Volm, D, Wetzel, C, Eckey, L, Holst, JC, Maxim, P, Heitz, R, Hoffmann, A, Broser, I, Mokhov, EN, Baranov, PG, Qiu, C, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 378, 521-6 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckey, L., Heitz, R., Hoffmann, A., Broser, I., Meyer, B. K., Hiramitsu, K., Detchprohm, T., Amano, H., Akasaki, I., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 142, 927 (1996).Google Scholar
Bergman, J. P., Monemar, B., Amano, H., Akasaki, I., Hiramatsu, K., Sawaki, N., Detchprohm, T., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 142, 931 (1996).Google Scholar
Buneau, G. E., Herzog, W. D., Ünlü, M. S., Goldberg, B. B., Molnar, R. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 838 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allègre, L., unpublished (The title must be entered, and surrounded by quote marks.)Google Scholar
Holst, J., Kaschner, A., Christen, J., Hiramatsu, K., Shibata, T., Sawaki, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3647 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, S., Walraet, F., Taylor, R. A., Ryan, J. F., Beaumont, B., Gibart, P., Phys. Rev. B 58, R15973 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wraback, Michael, Shen, H., Eiting, C. J., Carrano, J. C., Dupuis, R. D., MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 5S1, W11.55 (2000).Google Scholar
Song, J. J., Shan, W., Schmidt, T., Yang, X. H., Fisher, A., Hwang, S. W., Taheri, B., Goldenberg, B., Horning, R., Salvador, A., Kim, W., Atkas, Ö., Botchkarev, A., Morkoç, H., Proc. SPIE 2693, 86-96 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1a. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 180 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 1×109 cm−2.

Figure 1

Figure 1b. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 300 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 5×108 cm−2.

Figure 2

Figure 1c. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 480 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 3×108 cm−2.

Figure 3

Figure 1d. AFM (5×5µm2) scan showing the layer morphology for 720 sec SiN treatment time. The GaN islands density is about 1×108 cm−2.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Comparison between reflectivity spectra recorded during the growth of GaN/sapphire standard epilayer and Ultra Low dislocation (ULD) GaN/sapphire. Arrows indicate where the growth starts.

Figure 5

Figure 3. High Resolution image of the interface in a ULD GaN/sapphire sample.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Cross-sectional bright field image of the ULD GaN/sapphire sample showing the interface region. The arrow indicates the SiN coverage.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Near band gap low temperature photoluninescence of ULD GaN/sapphire

Figure 8

Figure 6. Decays of the free-excitons and I2 PL intensities recorded at 13K