Introduction
GaN and related materials have been extensively investigated due to their potential applications in short wavelength optoelectronics and high temperature, high power, high frequency electronicsReference Morkoc, Strite, Gao, Lin, Sverdlov and Burns 1 . Metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) and hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE) have been widely used and have generated materials with electrical and optical properties suitable for some device applicationsReference Nakamura and Fasol 2 . The growth conditions and hence the resulting materials properties in these two systems are different due to the different gallium precursors, operating conditions and reactor structure. MOVPE commonly uses trimethyl gallium or triethyl gallium, which can have complicated gas phase chemistry including the formation of adducts with NH3. HVPE utilizes GaCl generated in situ through the reaction of liquid Ga with HCl. The gas phase chemistry is potentially simpler than in the MOVPE system. Slow gas phase switching times and the general difficulties in growing Al-based materials hamper the use of the HVPE technique to applications involving heterojunctions. GaN produced by the HVPE technique does result in a greatly reduced intensity of the defect-based luminescence referred to as the yellow band (YL) when compared to the TMG-based materials. This has been attributed to the lack of carbon in the HVPE growth system which is present in the growth sources used for MOVPE. Intentional introduction of carbon into HVPE materials can result in the appearance of YLReference Zhang and Kuech 3 . If a controlled amount of GaCl can be introduced into a cold wall MOVPE reactor, a low carbon source could be combined with the advantages of the MOVPE reactor environment.
Diethyl gallium chloride (DEGaCl) is used here as a Ga source in GaN growth. DEGaCl will decompose to GaCl through the β-elimination reaction in the gas phase allowing the in situ formation of GaCl at relatively low gas phase temperatures:
This source was successfully used in GaAs growth that resulted in high uniformity, low carbon content GaAs filmReference Kuech, Potemski and Cardone 4 , Reference Narmann and Yu 5 . GaAs selective area growth, with a complete selectivity of GaAs growth with respect to SiO2, Si3N4, and Al2O3 masking materials, has been demonstrated over a wide range of process windowReference Kuech 6 , Reference Yamaguchi and Okamoto 7 , Reference Shiraishi, Furuhata and Okamoto 8 . The temperature range for GaAs using this source was 400-800°C and the higher temperature range of 1000-1150°C, required for conventional GaN growth, has not been investigated. We report here on the use of diethyl gallium chloride (DEGaCl) for the large area growth of GaN within a MOVPE system. The present work demonstrates the utility of the DEGaCl source in GaN epitaxial growth.
Experimental Procedure:
The GaN growth was carried out in a horizontal MOCVD reactor operated at a pressure of 76 Torr. RF induction was used to heat the graphite susceptor. Trimethyl gallium (TMGa), diethyl gallium chloride (DEGaCl) and NH3 were used as precursors in a hydrogen carrier gas. A disadvantage of the DEGaCl source is it s lower vapor pressure requiring both a heated bubbler that was kept at 60 °C and a heated source line to the reactor. Sapphire c-plane substrates were initially etched in H3PO4:H2SO4=1:3 solution at 70°C for 15 minutes, loaded into the reactor and then heated in a flowing H2 ambient to 1100°C for 10 minutes prior to the growth. Three comparison sample structures were used in this study. Samples A and C consists of an all DEGaCl or all TMGa-based growth respectively, allowing comparison of the growth chemistry under identical growth process conditions. Sample B is a structure comprised of an initial GaN layer that is identical to Sample C with an additional homoepitaxial GaN layer grown using DEGaCl. Samples A and B have a similar final thickness allowing a comparison of the impact of the initial nucleation of the GaN buffer layer on materials properties. These structures are summarized in Table 1.
All buffer layers were deposited at a temperature of 525°C and heated at a rate of 25°C per minute to 1050°C, then annealed at 1050°C for 10 minutes. The subsequent GaN epilayers in all samples were grown at a temperature of 1000 to 1150°C for 1 hour. The additional GaN layer grown in Sample B using the DEGaCl source was initiated by heating the sample structure (Sample C) to the growth temperature under a high NH3 partial pressure and directly starting the subsequent growth. The typical gas flows employed were 65μmol/min for Ga, 4.9 slm for NH3 and an additional 4 slm for H2 carrier gas.
Crystalline quality was measured by double crystal x-ray rocking curve at (002) and (104) Bragg peaks. Surface morphology was determined using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Room temperature Hall and C-V measurements were also obtained.
Result and Discussion:
Figure 1 shows the growth efficiency as a function of growth temperature using DEGaCl and TMGa. The growth efficiency (GE) is defined as the thickness of epitaxial film GaN (μm/min) deposited per Ga source flux (μmole/min) in the reactor feed. This calculation considers the TMGa source to be monomeric in the gas phase while DEGaCl gas phase consists of both dimeric and monomeric species. DEGaCl gas phase at 60°C has a dimer mole fraction of 0.759. The GE for both TMGa and DEGaCl increases with increasing temperature over the range 1000 to 1050 °C. At higher temperature, the GE of TMGa source was nearly temperature independent over the range of 1050 °C to 1150 °C, typical of a mass-transport-limited growth. The GE of DEGaCl source, however, decreased with increasing temperature from 1050 °C to 1150 °C. This behavior, we believe, can be attributed to thermodynamic factors. In the case of GaAs growth from DEGaCl, the growth rate is mass transport limited from 550-850°C, which was the upper limite of the investigated temperature range in that studyReference Kuech, Potemski and Cardone 4 . The simplest set of chemical reactions important at the GaN growth front in the case of DEGaCl are summarized as:
The last reaction implies equilibrium between the steady state concentrations of HCl and GaCl at the growth front. The MOVPE growth front has often been considered to be near thermodynamic equilibrium in many casesReference Stringfellow 10 . If this is the case for the high temperature growth of GaN, the supersaturation at the growth front will decrease with increasing temperature due the reversible reaction associated with the HCl reacting at the GaN surface.
The growth rate of GaN at a temperature of 1050°C as function of the carrier gas flow rate into the bubbler, for both DEGaCl and TMGa, is presented in Figure 2. The Ga flux, nGa in moles/min, is calculated as:
where QH is the flow rate of H2 carrier gas through the bubbler, PGa source is the vapor pressure of DEGaCl at the bubbler temperature, PT is the total pressure within the bubbler, and α is factor describing the degree of associating of the Ga source and assumes a value greater than unity, i.e. a=1 for a monomeric source, 2 for a dimeric source, and so on. The DEGaCl source has a much lower vapor pressure (0.5 Torr at 60°C) than TMGa source (30 Torr at −10°C), requiring a larger flow rate of the carrier gas H2 in order to carry out the same amount of Ga precursor. The GaN growth rate of using TMGa is linearly dependent on Ga flux into the reactor, which is linear with H2 carrier gas flow rate through the bubbler. The GaN growth rate from DEGaCl may have an indication of saturation at high carrier gas flow rates. This saturation is most probably due to source supply limitations at high carrier gas rates due to the low vapor pressure of the DEGaCl.
Typical AFM images of the GaN surface morphology for sample structures A, B, and C are given in Figure 3. The surface of both Samples A and B were obtained using DEGaCl source. The GaN surface morphology of these samples is quite smooth with sharp faceted step edges being readily apparent in the micrographs. The Sample C, grown using only the TMGa source for both buffer and high temperature layers, has a morphology typical of MOVPE GaN layers with a smooth surface and meandering steps. The average RMS roughness of Sample A was ∼ 0.5nm measured by AFM over a 10×10-micron area. The all-TMGa sample, Sample C, was slightly rougher with a RMS roughness value of ∼1.1nm. The difference in surface morphology can be attributed to the presence of the GaCl source at the growth front. Vapor phase epitaxy or VPE, utilizing inorganic halogen-based sources, can often lead to more faceted growth than MOVPE. The local thermal-equilibrium at the growth front implies the possibility of an etching or back-reaction reaction as indicated in the chemical reaction scheme outlined above. Surface asperities and defects would be active sites for the removal of GaN from the surface, through these back reactions, resulting in a reduction in surface roughness and the promotion of specific crystal facets. Additionally many chemical impurities form volatile chloride species enabling the possibility of higher purity films at these elevated temperatures.
The measured thin film properties for these structures, grown at 1050°C, are given in Table 1. The x-ray rocking curve line width, using the (0002) reflection, was as low as 300 arcsec on a 2.5-micron thick film for Sample A, utilizing an all- DEGaCl chemistry. The carrier concentration was measured to be as low as 1×1016 cm−3 by high frequency C-V measurement. Hall data yielded a much higher value for the carrier concentration than C-V data. The carrier concentration in our samples is very high near the initial growth interface due to the highly defected region at the GaN/sapphire interface. The Hall measurement data of Samples B and C can be analyzed by a simple two-layer Hall effect model allows the bulk electrical parameters to be extractedReference Look and Molnar 11 . We can use the measured properties on Sample C as input into such an analysis, allowing the electrical properties of the subsequently grown DEGaCl-based layer to be estimated. The calculated results indicate that the top DEGaCl-based GaN film in Sample B had a mobility of 600 cmReference Nakamura and Fasol 2 /V˙sec and a carrier concentration of 2×1016 cm−3, which agrees well with the C-V data on this sample.
Sample Structure | Sample A | Sample B | Sample C |
Properties | DEGaCl buffer and high temperature layer | DEGaCl high temperature layer on Sample C | TMGa buffer and high temperature layer |
X-ray FWHM (arcsec) at (0002) | 300” | 550” | 700” |
RMS Roughness (nm) over 10×10µm area | 0.51 | 1.14 | 1.18 |
Hall Concentration (cm−3) Hall Mobility (cm2/V˙sec) | 1×1018 80 | 3×1018 80 | 2.5×1018 62 |
Hall Mobility (cm2/V·sec) | 80 | 80 | 62 |
CV Concentration (cm−3) Thickness (μm) | 1×1016 2.5 | 2×1016 | 2×1016 1.5 |
Thickness (μm) | 2.5 | 0.7+1.5=2.2 | 1.5 |
Additional DEGaCl-based GaN film properties as a function of temperature and V/III ratio are given in Figure 4. The carrier concentration was measured by C-V technique and the X-ray diffraction rocking curve was measured at both (002) and (104) Bragg reflections. The GaN crystal quality increased with increasing growth temperature over 1000°C to 1100°C. V/III ratio has an optimized value of ∼ 3500 at a temperature of 1050°C in our reactor.
Summary:
The diethyl gallium chloride (DEGaCl) source was first studied for GaN growth in a MOVPE reactor. This Cl-based precursor exhibits a difference in growth rate and efficiency from the conventional TMGa-based growth. The DEGaCl-based growth efficiency decreases with increasing temperature indicating that the growth front may be close to local thermodynamic equilibrium. The presence of HCl-related reactions at the growth front can influence the surface morphology and chemical purity by providing reaction pathways for the removal of surface structural and chemical defects and impurities. The DEGaCl source provides a reduced carbon growth chemistry within a MOVPE-based reactor.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Aldrich for providing the DEGaCl source. The research funding from the ONR MURI on Compliant Substrates (C. Wood) and facilities support from the NSF UW-Materials Research Science and Engineering Center is gratefully acknowledged.