No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2024
As the need for collaboration across multiple organizations to deal with complex social issues such as poverty, crime, and public health grows, Public–Private Partnership (PPP) is of increasing importance. However, little is known about when and why private firms engage in such partnerships. Drawing on upper-echelon theory and the information-processing perspective, we highlight the importance of institutional knowledge and information embedded in CEO cross-sector work experience. We argue that such tacit knowledge and information enables CEOs to better identify the potential risks associated with PPPs. Consequently, CEOs with cross-sector work experience tend to be more cautious in participating in such partnerships, especially in developing economies like China, where private actors face greater information incompleteness concerning post-collaboration hazards due to the government's selective disclosure. Moreover, we develop a multi-moderator framework in which regional marketization and political connection alter the main effect by serving as supplementary information channels for private actors. A panel dataset of Chinese private listed firms from 2013 to 2021 provides strong support for our hypotheses. This study contributes to our understanding of the micro-foundation of PPP formation and draws attention to CEOs’ prior career experiences in different organizational forms.
随着多组织协作在应对贫困、犯罪和公共卫生等复杂社会问题中发挥着愈来愈关键的作用,政府和社会资本合作(PPP)也变得越来越重要。然而,关于私营企业何时以及为何参与这类合作伙伴关系,我们知之甚少。基于高层梯队理论和信息处理视角,我们认为 CEO 跨制度工作经验中所蕴含的制度知识和信息至关重要,这种隐性知识和信息使 CEO 能够更好地识别 PPP 在发展中国家的潜在风险。在中国,政府对 PPP 项目所带来的机会与风险倾向于进行选择性披露,导致私营企业面临不对称的信息环境。因此,与只有私营企业工作经历的 CEO 相比,同时具有公共部门与私营企业工作经验的 CEO 在参与此类合作时往往更为谨慎。此外,我们还发现区域市场化程度和企业政治关联可以作为补充信息的渠道改变 CEO 跨制度工作经验对企业 PPP 决策的影响。本文选取 2013—2021 中国私营上市公司数据样本为我们的研究假设提供了有力支持。本研究有助于我们理解 PPP 形成的微观基础,并引发对 CEO 在不同组织形式中的职业经验的关注