Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:17:53.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MONETARY POLICY AND SUNSPOT FLUCTUATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EURO AREA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2012

Yasuo Hirose
Yasuo Hirose*
Affiliation:
Keio University
*
Address correspondence to: Yasuo Hirose, 2-15-45 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We estimate a two-country open economy version of the New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model for the United States and the Euro area, using Bayesian techniques that allow for both determinacy and indeterminacy of the equilibrium. Empirical analysis shows that the worldwide equilibrium is indeterminate due to a passive monetary policy in the Euro area, even if U.S. policy is aggressive enough. We demonstrate that the impulse responses under indeterminacy exhibit dynamics different from those under determinacy and that sunspot shocks affect the Euro economy to a substantial degree, whereas the transmission of sunspots to the United States is limited.

Keywords

Monetary PolicyIndeterminacySunspot ShockOpen Economy ModelBayesian Analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adjemian, Stéphane, Pariès, Matthieu D., and Smets, Frank (2008) A Quantitative Perspective on Optimal Monetary Policy Cooperation between the US and the Euro Area. Working Paper Series 884, European Central Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolfson, Malin, Laséen, Stefan, Lindé, Jesper, and Villani, Mattias (2007) Bayesian estimation of an open economy DSGE model with incomplete pass-through. Journal of International Economics 72, 481–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Andreas and Farmer, Roger E.A. (2007) Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy: Comment. American Economic Review 97, 524–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Oliver J. and Kahn, Charles M. (1980) The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica 48, 1305–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, James and Mitra, Kaushik (2002) Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, James and Schaling, Eric (2009) Monetary policy, determinacy, and learnability in a two-block world economy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41, 1585–1612.Google Scholar
Bullard, James and Singh, Aarti (2008) Worldwide macroeconomic stability and monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, S34–S47.Google Scholar
Calvo, Guillermo A. (1983) Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstrom, Charles T. and Fuerst, Timothy S. (1999) Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Working Paper 9911, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (1998) Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. European Economic Review 42, 1033–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2002) A simple framework for international monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 879–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davig, Troy and Leeper, Eric M. (2007) Generalizing the Taylor principle. American Economic Review 97, 607–635.Google Scholar
Davig, Troy and Leeper, Eric M. (2010) Generalizing the Taylor principle: Reply. American Economic Review 100, 618–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fiore, Fiorella and Liu, Zheng (2005) Does trade openness matter for aggregate instability? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29, 1165–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. and Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67, 297–308.Google Scholar
Farmer, Roger E. A, Waggoner, Daniel F., and Zha, Tao (2009a) Indeterminacy in a forward-looking regime switching model. International Journal of Economic Theory 5, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Roger E. A, Waggoner, Daniel F., and Zha, Tao (2009b) Understanding Markov-switching rational expectations models. Journal of Economic Theory 144, 1849–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Roger E. A, Waggoner, Daniel F., and Zha, Tao (2010) Generalizing the Taylor principle: Comment. American Economic Review 100, 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, Jon, Rogers, John H., and Wright, Jonathan H. (2001) An Empirical Comparison of Bundesbank and ECB Monetary Policy Rules. International Finance Discussion Paper 705, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, Jordi and Gertler, Mark (1999) Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, Jordi and Monacelli, Tommaso (2005) Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72, 707–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdesmeier, Dieter and Roffia, Barbara (2004) Empirical estimates of reaction functions for the Euro area. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 140, 37–66.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Stefan (2007) Interest rate setting by the ECB, 1999–2006: Words and deeds. International Journal of Central Banking 3, 1–46.Google Scholar
Geweke, John F. (1999) Using simulation methods for Bayesian econometric models: Inference, development and communication. Econometric Reviews 18, 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justiniano, Alejandro and Preston, Bruce (2010) Monetary policy and uncertainty in an empirical small open-economy model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 25, 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Zheng, Waggoner, Daniel, and Zha, Tao (2009) Asymmetric expectation effects of regime shifts in monetary policy. Review of Economic Dynamics 12, 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. and Schorfheide, Frank (2003) Computing sunspot equilibria in linear rational expectations models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. and Schorfheide, Frank (2004) Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy. American Economic Review 94, 190–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. and Schorfheide, Frank (2006) A Bayesian look at new open economy macroeconomics. In Gertler, Mark and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2005, pp. 313–382. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. and Schorfheide, Frank (2007) Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy: Reply. American Economic Review 97, 530–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruge-Murcia, Francisco J. (2007) Methods to estimate dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 2599–2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. (2002) Solving linear rational expectations models. Computational Economics 20, 1–20.Google Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2003) Interest and Prices. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar