Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:30:13.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lichen elements as pollution indicators: evaluation of methods for large monitoring programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2017

Susan WILL-WOLF ,
Sarah JOVAN  and
Michael C. AMACHER
Susan WILL-WOLF
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1381, USA. Email: [email protected]
Sarah JOVAN
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Portland Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 620 SW Main, Suite 400, Portland, Oregon 97205-1381, USA
Michael C. AMACHER
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Logan Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 860 N 1200 E, Logan, Utah 84321, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lichen element content is a reliable indicator for relative air pollution load in research and monitoring programmes requiring both efficiency and representation of many sites. We tested the value of costly rigorous field and handling protocols for sample element analysis using five lichen species. No relaxation of rigour was supported; four relaxed protocols generated data significantly different from rigorous protocols for many of the 20 validated elements. Minimally restrictive site selection criteria gave quality data from 86% of 81 permanent plots in northern Midwest USA; more restrictive criteria would likely reduce indicator reliability. Use of trained non-specialist field collectors was supported when target species choice considers the lichen community context. Evernia mesomorpha, Flavoparmelia caperata and Physcia aipolia/stellaris were successful target species. Non-specialists were less successful at distinguishing Parmelia sulcata and Punctelia rudecta from lookalikes, leading to few samples and some poor quality data.

Keywords

Evernia mesomorphaFlavoparmelia caperatametalsnitrogenParmelia sulcataPhyscia aipolia/stellarisPunctelia rudectasulphur
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 415 - 424
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bargagli, R. & Mikhailova, I. (2002) Accumulation of inorganic contaminants. In Monitoring with Lichens – Monitoring Lichens. NATO Science Series (P. L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger & P. Wolseley, eds): 65–84. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Boltersdorf, S. H., Pesch, R. & Werner, W. (2014) Comparative use of lichens, mosses and tree bark to evaluate nitrogen deposition in Germany. Environmental Pollution 189: 43–53.Google Scholar
Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Center (2015) Community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) project. Version 5.1. November 2015 release. https://www.cmascenter.org/cmaq/ (Open-source development project hosted by U.S. EPA Atmospheric Science Modeling Division) Accessed November 2016.Google Scholar
Donovan, G. H., Jovan, S. E., Gatziolis, D., Burstyn, I., Michael, Y. L., Monleon, V. J. & Amacher, M. C. (2016) Using an epiphytic moss to identify previously unknown sources of atmospheric cadmium pollution. Science of the Total Environment 569: 84–93.Google Scholar
Ferry, B. W., Baddeley, M. S. & Hawksworth, D. L. (eds) (1973) Air Pollution and Lichens. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, P. B. C., van der Wat, L. & Kroukamp, E. M. (2015) Biomonitors. In Monitoring of Air Pollutants: Sampling, Sample Preparation, and Analytical Techniques. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 70 (P. B. C. Forbes, ed.): 53–108. Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.coac.2015.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailey, F. A. Y. & Lloyd, O. L. (1986) Methodological investigations into low technology monitoring of atmospheric metal pollution: part 3 – the degree of replicability of the metal concentrations. Environmental Pollution (Series B) 12: 85–109.Google Scholar
Gatziolis, D., Jovan, S., Donovan, G., Amacher, M. & Monleon, M. (2016) Elemental atmospheric pollution assessment via moss-based measurements in Portland, Oregon. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-938. Portland, Oregon: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/publications/gtrs2016.shtml (Accessed September 2016).Google Scholar
Geiser, L. H. & Neitlich, P. (2007) Air pollution and climate gradients in western Oregon and Washington indicated by epiphytic macrolichens. Environmental Pollution 145: 203–218.Google Scholar
Halleraker, J. H., Reimann, C., de Caritat, P., Finne, T. E., Kashulina, G., Niskaavaara, H. & Bogatyrev, I. (1998) Reliability of moss (Hylocomium splendens and Pleurozium schreberi) as a bioindicator of atmospheric chemistry in the Barents region: interspecies and field duplicate variability. Science of the Total Environment 218: 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller-Zeisler, S. F., Zeisler, R., Zeiller, E., Parr, R. M., Radecki, Z., Burns, K. I. & De Regge, P. (1999) Report on the intercomparison run for determination of trace and minor elements in lichen material IAEA-336. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Available at: http://www.iaea.org/programmes/aqcs/pdf/al_079.pdf (Accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Jovan, S. & McCune, B. (2006) Using epiphytic macrolichen communities for biomonitoring ammonia in forests of the greater Sierra Nevada, California. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 170: 69–93.Google Scholar
Jovan, S., Riddell, J., Padgett, P. E. & Nash, T. H. III (2012) Eutrophic lichens respond to multiple forms of N: implications for critical levels and critical loads research. Ecological Applications 22: 1910–1922.Google Scholar
Kansanen, P. H. & Venetvaara, J. (1991) Comparison of biological collectors of airborne heavy metals near ferrochrome and steel works. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 60: 337–359.Google Scholar
Karakas, S. Y. & Tuncel, S. G. (2004) Comparison of accumulation capacities of two lichen species analyzed by instrumental neutron activation analysis. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 259: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loppi, S., Faleri, C. & Paoli, L. (2014) Influence of sample cleaning prior to the analysis on the elemental content of the lichen Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 93: 350–353.Google Scholar
Markert, B., Wappelhorst, O., Weckert, V., Herpin, U., Siewers, U., Friese, K. & Breulmann, G. (1999) The use of bioindicators for monitoring the heavy-metal status of the environment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 240: 425–429.Google Scholar
Martin, M. H. & Coughtrey, P. J. (1982) Biological Monitoring of Heavy Metal Pollution. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
McMurray, J. A., Roberts, D. W., Fenn, M. E., Geiser, L. H. & Jovan, S. (2013) Using epiphytic lichens to monitor nitrogen deposition near natural gas drilling operations in the Wind River Range, WY, USA. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 224: 1487–1501.Google Scholar
National Acidic Deposition Program (NADP) (2016) Total deposition maps. Available at: http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/committees/tdep/tdepmaps/ (Accessed November 2016).Google Scholar
Paoli, L., Guttová, A., Grassi, A., Lackovicová, A., Senko, D. & Loppi, S. (2014) Biological effects of airborne pollutants released during cement production assessed with lichens (SW Slovakia). Ecological Indicators 40: 127–135.Google Scholar
Purvis, O. W., Chimonides, P. J., Jeffries, T. E., Jones, G. C., Read, H. & Spiro, B. (2005) Investigating biogeochemical signatures in the lichen Parmelia sulcata at Burnham Beeches, Buckinghamshire, England. Lichenologist 37: 329–344.Google Scholar
Root, H. T., Geiser, L. H., Fenn, M. E., Jovan, S., Hutten, M. A., Ahuja, S., Dillman, K., Schirokauer, D., Berryman, S. & McMurray, J. A. (2013) A simple tool for estimating throughfall nitrogen deposition in forests of western North America using lichens. Forest Ecology and Management 306: 1–8.Google Scholar
Sloof, J. E. & Wolterbeek, B. T. (1991) National trace-element air pollution monitoring survey using epiphytic lichens. Lichenologist 23: 139–165.Google Scholar
SPSS (2015) IBM SPSS Statistics. Release 23.0.0.0. 1989–2015.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016) Air data: air quality data collected at outdoor monitors across the US. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data (Accessed November 2016).Google Scholar
van Haluwyn, C. & van Herk, C. M. (2002) Bioindication: the community approach. In Monitoring with Lichens – Monitoring Lichens (P. L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger & P. Wolseley, eds): 39–64. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Will-Wolf, S., Nelsen, M. P., Trest, M. T., Rolih, K., Reis, A. & Jovan, S. (2014) Lichen community indices for response to climate and air quality in the Mid-Atlantic states, U.S.A. St. Paul, Minnesota: Internal USDA FIA report, October 2014.Google Scholar
Will-Wolf, S., Makholm, M. M., Nelsen, M. P., Trest, M. T., Reis, A. & Jovan, S. (2015) Element analysis of two common macrolichens supports bioindication of air pollution and lichen response in rural midwestern U.S.A. Bryologist 118: 59–82.Google Scholar
Will-Wolf, S., Jovan, S. & Amacher, M. A. (2017 a) Lichen elemental content bioindicators for air quality in upper Midwest, USA: a model for large-scale monitoring. Ecological Indicators 78: 253–263.Google Scholar
Will-Wolf, S., Jovan, S. & Amacher, M. C. (2017 b) Lichen elemental indicators for air pollution in eastern U. S. A. forests; a pilot study in the upper Midwest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report (in press).Google Scholar
Yemets, O. A., Solhaug, K. A. & Gauslaa, Y. (2014) Spatial dispersal of airborne pollutants and their effects on growth and viability of lichen transplants along a rural highway in Norway. Lichenologist 46: 809–823.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Will-Wolf supplementary material

Will-Wolf supplementary material 1

Download Will-Wolf supplementary material(File)
File 21.5 KB