Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:40:07.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wirthiotrema: a new genus for the Thelotrema glaucopallens group (Ascomycota: Ostropales: thelotremoid Graphidaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Eimy RIVAS PLATA ,
Klaus KALB  and
Andreas FRISCH
Eimy RIVAS PLATA
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The Field Museum. 1440 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago IL 60605, USA. Email: [email protected]; Biological Sciences Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Klaus KALB
Affiliation:
Lichenologisches Institut Neumarkt, Im Tal 12, D-92318 Neumarkt, Germany.
Andreas FRISCH
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044 SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new genus Wirthiotrema Rivas Plata, Kalb & Frisch. is described for the Thelotrema glaucopallens group, based on molecular and morphological evidence, with W. glaucopallens as the type species. The genus is characterized by myriotremoid thalli and apothecia, in combination with a paraplectenchymatous excipulum, I− ascospores, and stictic acid as a secondary compound. The new combinations W. glaucopallens (Nyl.) Rivas Plata & Kalb comb. nov., W. santessonii (Hale) Rivas Plata & Frisch comb. nov., and W. trypaneoides (Nyl.) Rivas Plata & Lücking comb. nov., are proposed and a key to the three species is presented.

Keywords

Ostropalean fungiLeptotremaLeucodectonThelotremataceae
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 197 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eriksson, O. E. & Hawksworth, D. L. (1998) Outline of the Ascomycetes—1998. Systema Ascomycetum 16: 83–298.Google Scholar
Frisch, A., Kalb, K. & Grube, M. (2006) Contributions towards a new systematics of the lichen family Thelotremataceae. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 92: 1–556.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1973) Studies on the lichen family Thelotremataceae. Part 1. Phytologia 26: 413–420.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1974) Morden-Smithsonian Expedition to Dominica: the lichens (Thelotremataceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 16: 1–46.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1978) A revision of the lichen family Thelotremataceae in Panama. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 38: 1–60.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1980) Generic delimitation in the lichen family Thelotremataceae. Mycotaxon 11: 130–138.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1981) A revision of the lichen family Thelotremataceae in Sri Lanka. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum (Botany) 8: 227–332.Google Scholar
Kalb, K. (1987) Brasilianische Flechten. 1. Die Gattung Pyxine. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 24: 1–106.Google Scholar
Kalb, K. (2004) New or otherwise interesting lichens II. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 88: 301–329.Google Scholar
Kauff, F & Lutzoni, F. (2002) Phylogeny of the Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 138–156.Google Scholar
Lutzoni, F., Pagel, M. & Reeb, V. (2001) Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411: 937–940.Google Scholar
Mangold, A., Elix, J. A. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2009) Thelotrematacaeae Flora of Australia, 57: 195–420.Google Scholar
Mangold, A., Martìn, M. P., Kalb, K., Lücking, R. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2008 a) Molecular data show that Topeliopsis (Ascomycota, Thelotremataceae) is polyphyletic. Lichenologist 40: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, A., Martìn, M. P., Lücking, R. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2008 b) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Taxon 57: 476–486.Google Scholar
Poelt, J. (1972) Die taxonomische Behandlung von Artenpaaren bei den Flechten. Botaniska Notiser 125: 77–81.Google Scholar
Poelt, J. (1970) Das Konzept der Artenpaare bei den Flechten. Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft, neue Folge 4: 187–198.Google Scholar
Redinger, K. (1936) Thelotremataceae Brasiliensis. Arkiv för Botanik 28A(8): 1–122.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. (1971) Thelotrema wightii (T. Tayl.) Nyl. Portugaliae Acta Biologica (B) 11: 35-37.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. (1972 a) Thelotrema Ach. section Thelotrema. 1. The T. lepadinum group. Lichenologist 5: 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, G. (1972 b) Thelotrema sect. Thelotrema, 2: The T. platycarpum group. Revue Bryologique et Lichenologique 38: 281-290.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. (1978) Thelotremata Achariana et Feeana. Nova Hedwigia 29: 405–427.Google Scholar
Staiger, B. 2002. Die Flechtenfamilie Graphidaceae. Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 85: 1–526.Google Scholar
Winka, K., Ahlberg, C. & Eriksson, O.E. (1998) Are there lichenized Ostropales? Lichenologist 30: 455–462.Google Scholar