Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:26:26.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sidi Khrebish 1971–2: The Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

Extract

The pottery so far examined is of great interest, and a full publication of the many sealed groups will undoubtedly form a valuable addition to our knowledge of the Hellenistic and Roman wares of the whole Mediterranean basin. Though little material classifiable as fine wares has yet been recovered belonging to the fourth century A.D. and later, in all other periods the most marked characteristic of the fine wares is their tremendous variety, and the fact that both eastern and western products are represented in comparable quantities. In the Hellenistic period, both Italian and Greek black-glazed wares are found, the latter slightly predominating, as well as a flourishing local industry producing similar shapes in a rather coarser fabric; Megarian bowls are present in limited quantity, principally in an orange micaceous fabric with a glossy slip of varying colour, but at least four other fabrics have been identified, one of them Athenian. The Eastern Sigillata wares A and B both occur in equal quantity, and Çandarli ware is also found; Arretine and its related Italian wares were imported in great quantities, and a certain amount of south and central Gaulish samian regularly occurs, but it is never common. Another red-gloss ware that is notable for its regular presence on this site and for the variety of its forms is that tentatively identified by Dr J. W. Hayes as Cypriot Sigillata: the type series for this ware at Sidi Khrebish will extend considerably that published by Hayes (Report of the Dept. of Antiquities of Cyprus, 1967), and will add many forms that are common to the repertoire of the early Roman Sigillata wares as a whole.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Libyan Studies 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 In the course of the year the following archaeologists worked on the site for longer or shorter periods; there was always present a team of two or three supervisors: Ball, Warwick, Bonanno, Anthony, Browne, David, Tatton-Brown, T. W., Claridge, Amanda, Dent, John, Donaldson, Peter, Fernandes, E., Glashan, Laura, Grealey, Shelagh, Johns, Jeremy, Kenrick, Philip, Lindquist, Gerda, Lloyd, John, Michaelides, Demetrios, Morrish, John, Pye, Elizabeth (conservationist), Riley, John, Sear, Frank, Prof.Strong, D. E..Google Scholar
2 See Kraeling, C. H., Ptolemais, City of the Libyan Pentapolis, Chicago, 1962.Google Scholar
3 The geographer Scylax talks of the ‘port’ of Euesperides as if it were separate from the city, see Jones, G. D. B. and Little, J. H., ‘Coastal Settlement in Cyrenaica’, Journ. Roman Studies, lxi (1971), 66–7.Google Scholar
4 Strabo, xvii, 3, 20. Goodchild, R. G., Benghazi, the story of a city, (2nd edn., 1963), Dept of Antiquities, Shahat.Google Scholar
5F. W., and Beechey, H. W., Proceedings of the Expedition to explore the Northern Coast of Africa from Tripoly eastward in 1821 and 1822, London, 1828, p. 281 (map).Google Scholar
6Jones, and Little, , loc cit.Google Scholar
7 Cf. Goodchild, R. G., ‘A coin-hoard from Balagrae (El-Beida) and the earthquake of A.D. 365’, Libya Antigua, iii–iv (19661977).Google Scholar