Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:36:02.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Dignity in Bioethics and Law, by Charles Foster. Oxford: Hart, 2011, xxxi + 178 + (index) 5pp (£30.00 paperback). ISBN 978-1-84946-177-1.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rosie Harding
Rosie Harding*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 668 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

46 Foster, C Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Law and Ethics (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

47 Foster, C Human Dignity in Bioethics and Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011) p 110.Google Scholar

48 Ibid, pp 177–178.

49 Ibid, p 6.

50 Ibid, p 8.

51 Ibid, p 18.

52 See, eg, Churchland, PS ‘Human dignity from a neurophilosophical perspective’ in Pellegrino, ED, Schulman, A and Merrill, TW (eds) Human Dignity and Bioethics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009) pp 99–121.Google Scholar

53 Foster, , above n 47, p 15.Google Scholar

54 Ibid, p 19.

55 Dempsey, K ‘Who gets the best deal from marriage: women or men?’ (2002) 38 Journal of Sociology 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 Foster, , above n 47, p 125.Google Scholar

57 See Harding, R ‘Sir Mark Potter and the protection of the traditional family: why same sex marriage is (still) a feminist issue’ (2007) 15 Feminist Legal Studies 223,CrossRefGoogle Scholar for an argument about the limitations of Art 8.

58 Ewick, P and Silbey, S The Common Place of Law (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998) p 47.Google Scholar

59 Foster, , above n 47, p 167.Google Scholar

60 Ibid, p 169.

61 Dworkin, R Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1993)Google Scholar ch 8.

62 Mental Capacity Act 2005, s 26 (hereafter ‘MCA’)

63 Ibid, s 4.

64 Ibid, s 25(1).

65 Foster, above n 47, p 169.

66 MCA s 25(3).

67 Ibid, s 3

68 Ibid, s 25(2)(c).

69 Herring, J ‘Review of C Foster Choosing Life, Choosing Death, the Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Law and Ethics ’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 Eg R ( On the application of McDonald)(Appellant) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 33.

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum