Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:43:12.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evil or Ill? - Justifying the insanity defence by Laurie Reznek. London: Routledge, 1997, xi + 310 + (bibliography + index) 19 pp (paperback £14.99, hardback £45)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lacey, N State Punishment (London: Routledge, 1988) p 74 Google Scholar.

2. Arenella, P.Character, Choice and Moral Agency: The Relevance of Character to Our Moral Culpability Judgments’ in Paul, E F et al (eds) Crime, Culpability and Remedy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990) p 61 Google Scholar.

3. Arenella above n 2 p 69.

4. [1960] 3 All ER I.

5. Duff, R. A. Choice, Character and Criminal Liability’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 345, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. See Boulas, N The Yorkshire Ripper: A Case Study of the Sutcliffe Papers (University of Manchester Occasional Papers No 11, 1983)Google Scholar.

7. M Moore ‘Choice, Character and Excuse’ Crime, Culpability and Remedy above n 2, pp 29, 53.

8. [1991] 2 All ER 769.

9. (1992) 95 DLR (4th) 27.

10. For discussion see Mackay, R D Mental Condition Defences in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995) pp 106–108 Google Scholar.

11. Steadman, H J et al Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform (New York: Guilford, 1993)Google Scholar.