Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:53:27.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delivery Rooms: For Women Only?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Jane Greenlaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Does a hospital have the right to prevent a qualified male nurse from working in its labor and delivery section? In Backus v. Baptist Medical Center, this question was answered in the affirmative by a United States District Court in Arkansas. The case, now on appeal, serves as an obstacle to professional nursing and an affront to the rights of female patients.

The plaintiff, Gregory Backus, is a registered nurse who, while employed by the defendant hospital, twice requested and was refused full time placement in its labor and delivery section. The refusals were based upon an unwritten policy that the hospital “did not employ male R.N.s in OBGI” positions because of the concern of our female patients for privacy and personal dignity which make it impossible for a male employee to perform the duties of this position effectively.”

Type
NLE Rounds
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 28 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

510 F. Supp. 1191 (E.D. Ark. 1981).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§2000(e), et seq.Google Scholar
Id. at 1193.Google Scholar
Id. at 1195.Google Scholar
Id. at 1195 quoting Larson, A., Employment Discrimination $14.30 (3d ed. 1980).Google Scholar
Id. at 1196-97, n.1.Google Scholar
R.N. Appeals Decision Barring Male Nurses from OB Units, American Nurse 13(8):3 (Sept. 1981).Google Scholar