We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
1
AIDS: Law and Policy, Law, Med. & Health Care1987, 15(1 & 2):3–89; See also Symposium devoted to the Harvard Model AIDS Legislation Project in the American Journal of Law & Medicine, 16(1–2), 1990.Google Scholar
2
AIDS: Science and Epidemiology, Law, Med. & Health Care1986, 14(5–6):225–303.Google Scholar
3
Life and Death Choices, Law, Med. & Health Care1989, 17(3):205–285.Google Scholar
4
Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy, Law, Med. & Health Care1988, 16(1–2):5–147.Google Scholar
5
Gilks, S.F., Ethical Imperialism (letter). New Engl. J. Med.1990;322(3):200.Google Scholar
6
Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and Others [1985] A.C. 871.Google Scholar
7
Layton, Robyn, a participant at London '89 and current chair of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee of Australia recently issued a Committee report on Reproductive Technology to Australia Health Ministers (August 1989).Google Scholar
8
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S.Ct. 3040 (1989).Google Scholar
See generally, Gostin, , “Human Rights in Mental Health: A Proposal for Five International Standards Based upon the Japanese Experience,”Int'l J. Law & Psychiatry1987, 10:353–368.Google Scholar