Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:32:21.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “New Formalism” in Disputing and Dispute Processing

Review products

Goldberg Stephen B., Green Eric D., and Sander Frank E. A. (eds.). Dispute Resolution. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1985). xxii + 594 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $28.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Austin Sarat
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , 1988 , pp. 695 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank William Felstiner, Christine Harrington, Stephanie Sandler, Susan Silbey, and David Trubek for their helpful comments.

References

ABEL, Richard (1982) “The Contradictions of Informal Justice,” in Abel, R. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abel, R. (1974) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
ACKERMAN, Bruce (1984) Reconstructing American Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold (1983) Justice Without Law. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
BOHANNON, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BOORSTIN, Daniel (1953) The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
BOYLE, James (1985) “The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought,” 133 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 685.Google Scholar
BREST, Paul (1981) “The Substance of Process,” 42 Ohio State Law Journal 131.Google Scholar
BUCKLE, Leonard and Suzann, THOMAS-BUCKLE (1982) “Doing unto Others: Dispute and Dispute Processing in an Urban American Neighborhood,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
BUMILLER, Kristin (1987) “Victims in the Shadow of the Law,” 12 Signs 421.Google Scholar
CAIN, Maureen and Kalman, KULSCAR (1981–82) “Thinking Disputes,” 16 Law & Society Review 374.Google Scholar
CAPPELLETTI, Mauro, and Bryant, GARTH (1978) Access to Justice, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.Google Scholar
CARRINGTON, Paul (1984) “Civil Procedure and Alternative Dispute Resolution,” 34 Journal of Legal Education 298.Google Scholar
CAVANAGH, Ralph, and Austin, SARAT (1980) “Thinking About Courts,” 14 Law & Society Review 371.Google Scholar
COHEN, Felix (1935) “Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach,” 35 Columbia Law Review 809.Google Scholar
COUNCIL ON THE ROLE OF COURTS (1984) The Role of Courts in American Society. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
DAHL, Robert (1961) Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DAVIS, Robert (1982) “Mediation: The Brooklyn Experiment,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
ECKHOFF, Torstein (1969) “The Mediator and the Judge,” in Aubert, V. (ed.), The Sociology of Law. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William, Richard, ABEL, and Austin, SARAT (1981) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William, and Lynne, WILLIAMS (1982) “Community Mediation in Dorchester, Massachusetts,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. (1978) “Mediation as an Alternative to Criminal Prosecution,” 2 Law and Human Behavior 223.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1949) Courts on Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1979) “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” 92 Harvard Law Review 353.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1971) “Mediation—Its Forms and Functions,” 44 Southern California Law Review 305.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1962) “Collective Bargaining and the Arbitrator,” in Proceedings, Fifteenth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1984) “Worlds of Deals,” 34 Journal of Legal Education 268.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mather, L. (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GIBBS, James (1967) “The Kpelle Moot,” in Bohannon, P. (ed.), Law and Warfare. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P. H. (1977) “On Mediators,” in Hamnett, I. (ed.), Social Anthropology and Law. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hamnett, I. (1969) “Dispute Settlement Without Courts,” in Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine (1985a) Shadow Justice. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine (1985b) “Socio-Legal Concepts in Mediation Ideology,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 33.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine (1984) “The Politics of Participation and Nonparticipation in Dispute Processes,” 6 Law and Policy 203.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine (1980) “Voluntariness, Consent and Coercion in Adjudicating Minor Disputes,” in Brigham, J. and Brown, D. (eds.), Policy Implementation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
HART, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Rules. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
HART, Henry, and Albert, SACKS (1958) “The Legal Process.” Unpublished (on file with author).Google Scholar
HARTZ, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
HOHFELD, Wesley Newcomb (1913) “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” 23 Yale Law Journal 16.Google Scholar
HOROWITZ, Donald (1977) The Courts and Social Policy. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
KELMAN, Mark (1981) “Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law,” 33 Stanford Law Review 591.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, Duncan (1980) “Toward an Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness,” 3 Research in Law and Sociology 3.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, Duncan (1973) “Legal Formality,” 2 Journal of Legal Studies 351.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1981) “The End of the Road: Problems in the Analysis of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 717.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl (1930) “A Realistic Jurisprudence—The Next Step,” 30 Columbia Law Review 432.Google Scholar
McEWEN, Craig, and Richard, MAIMAN (1986) “The Relative Significance of Disputing Forum and Dispute Characteristics for Outcome and Compliance,” 20 Law & Society Review 439.Google Scholar
MARKS, Jonathan, Earl, JOHNSON, and Peter, SZANTON (1984) Dispute Resolution in America. Washington, DC: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn, and Barbara, YNGVESSON (1981) “Language, Audience and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 775.Google Scholar
MENKEL-MEADOW, Carrie (1986) “Dispute Resolution: The Periphery Becomes the Core,” 69 Judicature 300.Google Scholar
MENSCH, Elizabeth (1982) “The History of Mainstream Legal Thought,” in Kairys, D. (ed.), The Politics of Law. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
MENTSCHIKOFF, Soia (1961) “Commercial Arbitration,” 61 Columbia Law Review 846.Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally (1982) “The Social Organization of Mediation in Nonindustrial Societies,” in Abel, R. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard, and Austin, SARAT (1981) “Grievances, Claims and Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
MINOW, Martha (1984) “Some Thoughts on Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure,” 34 Journal of Legal Education 284.Google Scholar
MNOOKIN, Robert, and Lewis, KORNHAUSER (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law,” 88 Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
MUNGER, Frank, and Carroll, SERRON (1984) “Critical Legal Studies Versus Critical Legal Theory,” 6 Law and Policy 257.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1980) No Access to Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura, and Duane, METZGER (1963) “Conflict Resolution in Two Mexican Communities,” 65 American Anthropologist 584.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura, and Henry, TODD (1978) The Disputing Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
OLSEN, Frances (1985) “The Myth of State Intervention in the Family,” 18 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 835.Google Scholar
PELLER, Gary (1985) “The Metaphysics of American Law,” 73 California Law Review 1151.Google Scholar
POUND, Roscoe (1923) “The Theory of Judicial Decision,” 36 Harvard Law Review 641.Google Scholar
POUND, Roscoe (1906) “The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice,” 29 American Bar Association Reports 395.Google Scholar
ROEHL, Janice, and Roger, COOK (1982) “The Neighborhood Justice Centers Field Test,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Maurice (1981) “Civil Justice Research and Civil Justice Reform,” 15 Law & Society Review 473.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Maurice (1971) “Devising Procedures That Are Civil to Promote Justice That Is Civilized,” 69 Michigan Law Review 797.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Maurice, and Myra, SCHUBIN (1961) “Trial by Lawyer: Compulsory Arbitration of Small Claims in Pennsylvania,” 74 Harvard Law Review 448.Google Scholar
SANDER, Frank (1982) “Varieties of Dispute Processing,” in Tomasic, R. and Feeley, M. (eds.), Neighborhood Justice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1984) “The Emergence of Disputes,” in Vermont Law School, A Study of the Barriers to the Use of Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution. South Royalton, VT: Vermont Law School.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1981) “The Role of Courts and the Logic of Court Reform,” 64 Judicature 300.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and William, FELSTINER (1986) “Law and Strategy in the Divorce Lawyer's Office,” 20 Law & Society Review 93.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and Joel, GROSSMAN (1975) “Courts and Conflict Resolution,” 69 American Political Science Review 1200.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin, and Susan, SILBEY (1987) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” Law and Policy.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Martin (1981) Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SILBEY, Susan, and Sally, MERRY (1986a) “Interpretive Processes in Mediation and Courts. Unpublished (on file with author).Google Scholar
Sally, MERRY (1986b) “Mediator Settlement Strategies,” 8 Law and Policy 7.Google Scholar
Sally, MERRY (1985) “The Problems Shape the Process.” Unpublished (on file with author).Google Scholar
SIMON, William (1984) “Vision of Practice in Legal Thoughts,” 36 Stanford Law Review 469.Google Scholar
SINGER, William (1984) “The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory,” 94 Yale Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
SPIEGELMAN, Paul (1987) “Civil Procedure and Alternative Dispute Resolution,” 37 Journal of Legal Education 26.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1984) “Turning Away from Law,” 82 Michigan Law Review 824.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1981) “Studying Courts in Context,” 15 Law & Society Review 485.Google Scholar
TUSHNET, Mark (1980) “Post-Realist Legal Scholarship,” 1980 Wisconsin Law Review 1383.Google Scholar
TUSHNET, Mark (1979) “Truth, Justice and the American Way,” 57 Texas Law Review 1307.Google Scholar
VERMONT LAW SCHOOL (1984) Removing the Barriers to the Use of Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution. South Royalton, VT: Vermont Law School.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1984) “The Small Claims Court,” 18 Law & Society Review 515.Google Scholar
WHITE, G. Edward (1984) “The Inevitability of Critical Legal Studies,” 36 Stanford Law Review 649.Google Scholar
WHITE, G. Edward (1978) Patterns of American Legal Thought. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara, and Lynn, MATHER (1983) “Courts, Moots and the Disputing Process,” in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar