Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:28:31.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Role in a Nonjuducial Setting: Some Survey Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

John Sprague ,
Elmer E. Cornwell Jr.  and
Jay S. Goodman
John Sprague
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis
Elmer E. Cornwell Jr.
Affiliation:
Brown University
Jay S. Goodman
Affiliation:
Wheaton College, Massachusetts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A question of interest to political and legal scholars is: Does experience in a judicial role produce political perceptions and attitudes which systematically differ from those produced by the lawyer-advocate (nonjudicial) role? To date, the efforts of the judicial behaviorists have centered on an elicitation of attitudes from either judges or advocates, but few studies have been structured to examine both roles in respect to a common stimuli set. A rare opportunity to make such a comparative survey presented itself to the investigators in conjunction with their participation in a more extensive study of state constitutional conventions. In conjunction with a study of the New York Constitutional Convention of 1966-67, interviews were conducted with 175 of the 186 delegates to that convention. Of these 175 delegates, 22 were judges and 101 were lawyers. This situation was unique, for it allowed a direct comparison

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , February 1970 , pp. 371 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by the Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

AUTHORS' NOTE: The authors are grateful to the Carnegie Corporation of New York, which is sponsoring a comparative behavioral study of state constitutional conventions. Research is completed in Rhode Island, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky; it is under way or in design for Hawaii, Connecticut, Illinois, and New Mexico. All data are processed at the Brown University Computing Lab; those presented here were analyzed with original crosstab program “Interview” written by Richard Croteau for the IBM 360/50.

References

BECKER, T. L. (1966a) “Surveys and judiciaries, or who's afraid of the purple curtain?” Law and Society Rev. 1 (November): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKER, T. L. (1966b) “A survey study of Hawaiian judges: the effect on decisions of judicial role variations.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 60 (September): 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EDELMAN, M. (1967) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
EULAU, H. and J. D., SPRAGUE (1964) Lawyers in Politics: A Study in Professional Convergence. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
RUCHELMAN, L. I. (1966) “Lawyers in the New York state legislature: the urban factor.” Midwest J. of Pol. Sci. 10 (November): 484497.Google Scholar
WAHLKE, J. C., EULAU, H., BUCHANAN, W. and L., FERGUSON (1962) The Legislative System: Explorations in Legislative Behavior. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar