Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:29:08.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Domestication of Violence in Mediation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Sara Cobb
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article, based on an analysis of 30 community mediation sessions, provides a theoretical frame for tracking the emergence and domestication of violence stories in the sessions themselves. Challenging the Cartesian distinction between mental and physical violence, I use Scarry's 1985 work to identify the presence of violence stories as stories in which speakers (1) objectify pain through the discursive production of weapons and wounds, (2) describe the loss of voice itself, and (3) describe attempts to reappear as agents in the elimination of pain itself. Drawing on Minow's 1987 analysis of rights discourse, I offer a definition of the “domestication” of violence as a movement from “rights” to “needs” in the discourse of the session. With this framework, and consistent with Silbey and Sarat's 1989 research, I found that violence stories were domesticated in 80% of the sessions in which such stories emerged. Finally, drawing on Foucault (1979), I describe this domestication process as a function of the “microphysics of power” and track the rules of transformation through which violence is subducted into the discourse of mediation itself. I argue that the mediation process contributes to erase any morality that competes with the morality of mediation and, in the process, disappears violence.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , 1997 , pp. 397 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

The data collection for this research was supported by monies from the Fund for Research on Dispute Resolution. The idea for this project was Janet Rifkin's, born during our collaboration on the practice of neutrality in mediation; I wish to express my appreciation to her for focusing my attention on this issue. I also wish to thank the members of the Amherst Legal Seminar for their comments. My comrade, Kathy Weingarten, also contributed to this project by commenting on earlier drafts. I also give special thanks to Elyse Kutz for her work on the revisions.

References

Abel, Richard L. (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution & Bruce Brodigan (1988) State Legislation on Dispute Resolution: Laws Providing for Informal and Non-Judicial Processes in the 50 States and District of Columbia. Management Series, #B. Chicago: Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution, American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Mugford, Stephen S. (1994) “Conditions of Successful Reintegration Ceremonies: Dealing with Juvenile Offenders,” 34 British J. of Criminology 139–71.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin (1988) The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Robert A. Baruch, & Folger, Joseph P. (1994) The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul (1986) “Metaphor, Euphemism and the Militarization of Language,” 23 (4) J. of Peace Research 7–20.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara (1992a) “A Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis: Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Role of Interaction,” 4 (2) Communication Theory 132–52.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara-(1992b) “Theories of Responsibility' in Mediation: The Social Construction of Intentions in Mediation,” 18 (2) Discourse Processes 165–86.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara-(1993) “Empowerment and Mediation: A Narrative Perspective,” 9 Negotiation J. 245–59.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara (1994) “A Critique of Critical Discourse Analysis: Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Role of Intervention,” 4 (2) Communication Theory 132–52.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara, & Rifkin, Janet (1991) “Practice and Paradox: Deconstructing Neutrality in Mediation,” 16 Law & Social Inquiry 35–62.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. (1986) “Violence and the Word,” 95 Yale Law J. 1601–29.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and Power. New York: Longman Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha L. (1988) “Dominant Discourse, Professional Language and Legal Changes in Child Custody Decision-Making,” 101 Harvard Law Rev. 727–74.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha, & Mykitiuk, Roxanne (1994) The Public Nature of Private Violence: The Discovery of Domestic Abuse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha, & Thomadsen, Nancy, eds. (1991) At the Boundaries of Law: Feminism and Legal Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela (1991) “Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument,” 56 American Sociological Rev. 818–35.Google Scholar
Germane, Charlotte, Johnson, Margaret, & Lemon, Nancy (1985) “Mandatory Custody Mediation and Joint Custody Orders in California: The Danger for Victims of Domestic Violence,” 1 Berkeley Women's Law J. 175–200.Google Scholar
Girard, Rene (1979) Violence and the Sacred, trans. Gregory, P.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David, & Dingwall, Robert (1989) “Selective Facilitation: Some Preliminary Observations on a Strategy Used by Divorce Mediators,” 23 Law & Society Rev. 613–43.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1985) “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debate,” 2 Critical Studies in Mass Communication 91–114.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. (1987) Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, Rene Girard and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B. (1985) Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B., & Merry, Sally Engle (1988) “Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation” (Special Issue: Law & Ideology), 22 Law & Society Rev. 709–35.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard (1987) Neighborhood Justice in Capitalist Society: The Expansion of the Informal State. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Adrian (1991) “The Problem of Privatized Injuries: Feminist Strategies for Litigation,” in Fineman & Thomadsen 1991.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1995) The Rights of Minority Cultures. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, Carol (1984) “Women, Mediation and Family Law,” 15 Clearinghouse Rev. 266.Google Scholar
Lerman, Lisa G. (1984) “Mediation of Wife-Abuse Cases: The Adverse Impact of Informal Dispute Resolution on Women,” 7 Harvard Women's Law Rev. 57–113.Google Scholar
Lerman, Lisa G.-(1989) “Enforcing the Law against Wife Abusers: The Role of Mental Health Professionals,” in Family Violence: Emerging Issues of a National Crisis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdaire C. (1988) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McGillis, Daniel (1986) Community Dispute Resolution Programs and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Office of Communication & Research Utilization, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
McKenna, Andrew J. (1992) Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1989) “Mediation in Non-industrial Societies,” in K. Kressel & D. G. Pruitt, eds., Mediation Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, & Milner, Neal A., eds. (1995) The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation in the United States. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Messman, Heinz, & Otto, Hans-Uwe, eds. (1992) Restorative Justice on Trial: Pitfalls and Potentials of Victim-Offender Mediation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mika, Harry, ed. (1995) Special Issue: “Victim and Offender Mediation: International Perspectives on Theory, Research and Practice,” 12 (3) Mediation Q. 199–297.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha (1987) “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover,” 96 Yale Law J. 1860–1915.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha-(1990) Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Minuchin, Salvador (1974) Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlich, George (1996) “The Power of Community Mediation: Government and Formation of Self-Identity,” 30 Law & Society Rev. 707–33.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1978) “Attributions of Responsibility: Blaming,” 12 Sociology 115–21.Google Scholar
Retzinger, Suzanne M., & Scheff, Thomas J. (1996) “Strategy for Community Conferences: Emotions and Social Bonds,” in Galway, B. & Hudson, J., eds., Restorative Justice. Albany, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Janet (1989) “Mediation in the Justice System: A Paradox for Women,” 1 (1) Women & Criminal Justice 41–54.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Janet, & Harrington, Christine B. (1987) The Gender Organization of Mediation: Implications for the Feminization of Legal Practice. Institute for Legal Studies Working Papers, Series 4. Madison: Institute for Legal Studies, Univ. of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Sander, Frank (1976) “Varieties of Dispute Processing,” 70 Federal Rules Decisions III. 111–34.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1993) “Speaking of Death: Narratives of Violence in Capital Trials,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 19–58.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R. (1991) “A Journey through Forgetting: Toward a Jurisprudence of Violence,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., The Fate of Law. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, T. R.-(1992a) “Making Peace with Violence: Robert Cover on Law and Legal Theory,” in Sarat & Kearns 1992b.Google Scholar
Kearns, T. R., eds. (1992b) Law's Violence. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine (1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., & Lyman, Stanford M. (1968) “Accounts,” 33 American Sociological Rev. 46–61.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael J. (1988) The Politics of Representation: Writing Practices in Biography, Photography, and Policy Analysis. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, & Sarat, Austin (1989) “Dispute Processing in Law and Legal Scholarship: From Institutional Critique to the Reconstruction of the Juridical Subject,” 66 Denver Univ. Law Rev. 437–98.Google Scholar
Sluzki, Carlos E. (1993) “Toward a Model of Family and Political Victimization: Implications for Treatment and Recovery,” 56 Psychiatry 178–87.Google Scholar
Stallone, Dianna R. (1984) “Decriminalization of Violence in the Home: Mediation in Battering Cases,” 2 Law & Inequality 493–519.Google Scholar
Straus, Murray A. (1990) “New Scoring Methods for Violence and New Norms for the Conflict Tactics Scale,” in Straus & Gelles 1990.Google Scholar
Straus, Murray A. & Gelles, Richard, eds. (1990) Physical Violence in American Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Julie (1994) “Body Memories: Aide-Memoirs and Collective Amnesia in the Wake of the Argentine Terror,” in Ryan, M. & Gordon, A., eds., Body Politics: Disease, Desire and the Family. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., & Esser, John P. (1989) “‘Critical Empiricism’ in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program or Pandora's Box?” 14 Law & Social Inquiry 3–52.Google Scholar
Ury, William, Brett, Jeanne, & Goldberg, Stephen (1987) “Into the Fray.” Unpub. MS.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1988) “Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court and the Construction of Community in a New England Town,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 409–49.Google Scholar