Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:02:53.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Blue Jeans, Rape, and the “De-Constitutive” Power of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Kitty Calavita
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Italy's Supreme Court recently overturned a rape conviction on the grounds that the woman was wearing blue jeans at the time. The Court reasoned that blue jeans cannot be removed “without the active cooperation of the person who is wearing them,” and therefore sexual intercourse must have been consensual. The decision was met with outrage by media commentators, political leaders, and ordinary Italians in a range of civic organizations. I argue here that this case and others like it are conspicuously inconsistent with a constitutive perspective that sees law and everyday normative orders as mutually embedded, or at least reciprocally reinforcing, and that focuses on law's hegemonic potential. In this revisiting of the constitutive approach, I propose that the concept of legal hegemony be elaborated to include the counterintuitive possibility that law can sabotage the very ideologies it invokes. For when an authoritative source such as law is so out of step with the evolving normative order, the shocking discrepancy exposes not only the fallibility of law but also the foolishness of the outdated moral vision it is caught endorsing. Finally, I suggest that it may be during “unsettled cultural periods” (Swidler 1986) that such “de-constitutive” moments are most likely.

Type
International Research on Women and Violence
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , 2001 , pp. 89 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

References

References

Abel, Richard L. (1990) “A Critique of Torts,” 37 UCLA Law Rev. 785–831.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila (1990) “The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power Through Bedouin Women,” 17 American Ethnologist 41–55.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis (1971) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick (1987) And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick (1992) Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Lucia Chiavola (1988) Liberazione della Donna: Feminism in Italy. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bredbenner, Candice Lewis (1998) A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Brigham, John (1987) The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty (1996) “The New Politics of Immigration: ‘Balanced-Budget Conservatism’ and the Symbolism of Proposition 187,” 43 Social Problems 284–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canosa, Romano (1996) Storia della Magistratura Italiana: Da Piazza Fontana a Mani Pulite. Milan: Baldini e Castoldi.Google Scholar
Cassazione Penale (1999) Codice penale, 1999, n.1047:2194–2204.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, & Comaroff, John (1991) Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa, Vol. 1. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O'Barr, William M. (1990) Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., O'Barr, William M. & Lind, Allan E. (1978) “The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom,” 1978 Duke Law J. 1375.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999a) “Annullata la Condanna a un Istruttore di Guida Accusato dall'allieva Diciottenne,” 11 Feb. 1999, 19.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999b) “Stupro, le Deputat si Ribellano in Jeans,” 12 Feb. 1999, 10.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999c) “Dure Polemiche dopo l'annullamento della Condanna per Violenza,” 12 Feb. 1999, prima pagina.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999d) “Sul Sito Internet ‘Italians’,” 13 Feb. 1999, 13.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999e) “Silvia Costa: Confusione Culturale. Deborah Compagnoni: Jeans sul Podio,” 13 Feb. 1999, 13.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (Milan) (1999f) “Dal Polo all'Ulivo, Mozione delle Consigliere Regionali per Contestare le Sentenza Chic sullo Stupro,” 16 Feb. 1999, 6.Google Scholar
Cotta, Maurizio, & Isernia, Pierangelo (1996) Il Gigante dai Piedi d'argilla. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Coutin, Susan Bibler (1994) “Enacting Law Through Social Practice: Sanctuary as a Form of Resistance,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S. F., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. by Rendall, Steven. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
de Florio, Antonio (1999a) “Lei Indossava I Jeans? Mora non c'e Stupro,” Il Messaggero, 11 Feb. 1999, interni.Google Scholar
de Florio, Antonio (1999b) “Il Giudice: ‘Ma che Stupro? Lei dopo lo Invito a Pranzo,”‘ Il Messaggero, 12 Feb. 1999, primo piano.Google Scholar
De Laurentis, Teresa, ed. (1990) Sexual Difference: A Theory of Social Symbolic Practice. The Milan Women's Bookstore Collective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, & Stefancic, Jean (1989) “Why Do We Tell the Same Stories? Law Reform, Critical Librarianism, and the Triple Helix Dilemma,” 42 Stanford Law Rev. 207.Google Scholar
De Luca, Maria Novella (1999a) “Io Giudice-Donna Vi Spiego Quella Corte in Mano ai Maschi,” La Repubblica (Rome), 11 Feb. 1999, 10.Google Scholar
De Luca, Maria Novella (1999b) “‘E Solo una Frase Infelice; Non Siamo Maschilisti,‘” La Repubblica, 12 Feb. 1999, 3.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile ([1893] 1933) The Division of Labor in Society. trans. Simpson, by George. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1995) “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1999) “Common Knowledge and Ideological Critique: The Significance of Knowing that the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 1025–41.Google Scholar
Fiandaca, Giovanni (1999) Il Foro Italiano. Giurisprudenza Penale, seconda parte, 164–70.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1992) The Mythology of Modern Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1997) “Distant Relations: The New Constructionism in Critical and Socio-Legal Studies,” in Thomas, P. A., ed., Socio-Legal Studies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter (1998) “Missing Possibility: Socialization, Culture, and Consciousness,” in Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S., eds., Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1978) The History of Sexuality. Vol. The History of Sexuality. Vol: An Introduction. trans. Hurley, by Robert. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. trans. Sheridan, by Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve (1994) “The Reflexive Politics of Constructionism,” 7 History of the Human Sciences 87–93.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter, & Feinman, Jay (1998) “Contract Law as Ideology,” in Kairys, D., ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3d Ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Garbesi, Marina (1999) “La Protesta in Jeans,” La Repubblica, 12 Feb. 1999, 2.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Greco, Anna Maria (1999) “‘Lei Portava i Jeans, non e Stupro,‘” Il Giornale (Milan), 11 Feb. 1999, 16.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. (1986) Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. (1988) “Courting Difference: Issues of Interpretation and Comparison in the Study of Legal Ideologies,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 687–707.Google Scholar
Grignetti, Francesco (1999) “‘Sono Rigorosi, non Maschilisti,‘” La Stampa (Rome), 13 Feb. 1999, 12.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Alberto (1999) “Violenza Sessuale: Le Onorevoli Contestano la Sentenza della Suprema Corte e da Oggi Sospendono il Tailleur,” Il Messaggero, 12 Feb. 1999, primo piano.Google Scholar
Gutterriez, Felipe R. (1998) “Ideas of the Everyday in Research on Legal Interpretation,” in Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S., eds., Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases. Chicago: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Jerome (1935) Theft, Law, and Society. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (1993) “Abigail Bailey's Coverture: Law in a Married Woman's Consciousness,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas, Linebaugh, Peter, Rule, John G., Thompson, E. P. & Winslow, Cal, eds., (1975) Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hellman, Judith Adler (1987) Journeys Among Women: Feminism in Five Italian Cities. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F. (1994) “Kadhi's Courts as Complex Sites of Resistance: The State, Islam, and Gender in Postcolonial Kenya,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S. F., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F., & Lazarus-Black, Mindie (1994) “Introduction/Performance and Paradox: Exploring Law's Role in Hegemony and Resistance,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1985) “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 11–37.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1990) “Rights and Social Movements: Counter-Hegemonic Strategies,” 17 J. of Law & Society 309–28.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1993) Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, Francesco Mauro (1999) “Toghe e Jeans. Per una Difesa (Improbabile) di una Sentenza Indifendibile,” Cassazione Penale (1999). Codice penale, 1999, n.1047:2204–11.Google Scholar
Il Giornale (Milan) (1999a) “D'Ambrosio: Ma Non e una Questione di Principio,” 12 Feb. 1999, 2.Google Scholar
Il Giornale (Milan) (1999b) “A Montecitorio la Protesta in Jeans,” 12 Feb. 1999, 2.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero (1999a) “Jeans, la Rivolta delle Donne,” 12 Feb. 1999, prima pagina.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero (1999b) “Il Ministro della Cultural Melandri: ‘Un Salto che ci Porta Indietro di Anni,‘” 12 Feb. 1999, primo piano.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero (1999c) “L-ex Presidente della Camera Pivetti: ‘Un Giudizio Malato e Provocatorio,‘” 12 Feb. 1999, primo piano.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero (1999d) “Quei Giudici ‘Esperti’ in Stupri e Spazzatura,” 13 Feb. 1999, interni.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (1998) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd Ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kidder, Robert (1979) “Toward an Integrated Theory of Imposed Law,” in Burman, S. E. & Harrell-Bond, B., eds., The Imposition of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
La Repubblica (1999a) “‘Con i Jeans non e Stupro,‘” 11 Feb. 1999, 1.Google Scholar
La Repubblica (1999b) “Basta Intrusioni nel Merito,” 12 Feb. 1999, 4.Google Scholar
La Stampa (1999) “Silvia Costa: Transferire le Competenze,”' 13 Feb. 1999, 12.Google Scholar
Lazarus-Black, Mindie (1994) “Slaves, Masters, and Magistrates: Law and the Politics of Resistance in the British Caribbean, 1736–1834,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S. F., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lazarus-Black, Mindie, & Hirsch, Susan F., eds. (1994) Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Law, Steven, & Scull, Andrew (1983) Durkheim and the Law. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A (1993) “Reflections on Law in the Everyday Life,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1996) “Casual Versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being so Positive ...),” 21 Law & Social Inquiry, 457–82.Google Scholar
McMillan (1992) “This is America,” New York Times, 1 May 1992:A35.Google Scholar
Medcalf, Linda (1978) Law and Identity: Lawyers, Native Americans, and Legal Practice. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1998) “The Criminalization of Everyday Life,” in Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., Lawrence, S., eds., Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth (1988) “The Uses of History: Language, Ideology, and Law in the United States and South Africa,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 661–85.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Folk (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Naples Daily News (1999) “Women Urged to Wear Jeans Today to Protest Italian Court Ruling in Rape Case,” 12 Mar. 1999, 1.Google Scholar
Nelken, David (1996a) “Stopping the Judges,” in Caciagli, M. & Kertzer, D. L., eds., Italian Politics: The Stalled Transition. CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David (1996b) “A Legal Revolution? The Judges and Tangentopoli,” in Gundie, S. & Parker, S., eds., The New Italian Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to the Rise of Berlusconi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M., & Conley, John M. (1985) “Litigant Satisfaction Versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 661–701.Google Scholar
Pederzoli, Patrizia, & Guarnieri, Carlo (1997) “The Judicialization of Politics, Italian Style,” 2 J. of Modern Italian Studies 321–36.Google Scholar
Pijola, Marida Lombardo (1999) “Sentenza della Cassazione: 'Lei Indossava I Jeans: Non Poteva Essere uno Stupro,” Il Messaggero, 11 Feb. 1999, prima pagina.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos (1969) “The Problem of the Capitalist State,” 58 New Left Rev. 67–87.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos (1973) Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Santonastaso, Piero (1999) “I Produttori: 'Un Capo anti-violenza? Che Strano,” ll Messaggero, 13 Feb. 1999, interni.Google Scholar
Sapelli, Giulio (1997) “The Transformation of the Italian Party System,” 2 J. of Modern Italian Studies 167–87.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1995) Divorce Lawyers and their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R., eds. (1993) Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, Constable, Marianne, Engel, David, Hans, Valerie, & Lawrence, Susan (1998) “The Concept of Boundaries in the Practices and Products of Sociolegal Scholarship: An Introduction” in Sarat, A., Constable, M., Engel, D., Hans, V., & Lawrence, S., eds., Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Seng, Yvonne J. (1994) “Standing at the Gates of Justice: Women in the Law Courts of Early-Sixteenth-Century Uskudar, Istanbul,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S. F., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan (1985) “Ideals and Practices in the Study of Law,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 7.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1988) “Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 771–800.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Starr, June, & Collier, Jane F., eds. (1989) History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann (1986) “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” 51 American Sociological Rev. 273–86.Google Scholar
Taub, Nadine, & Schneider, Elizabeth M. (1998) “Women's Subordination and the Role of Law,” in Kairys, D., ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3d Ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Therborn, Goran (1980) The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
U.S. Constitution, Amendment VXIII, 1920.Google Scholar
Ventura, Marco (1999) “Il Giudice: ‘Ma lo Sono Feminista,‘” Il Giornak, 12 Feb. 1999, 3.Google Scholar
Vincent, Joan (1994) “On Law and Hegemonic Moments: Looking Behind the Law in Early Modern Uganda,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S. F., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1993) Race Matters. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
White, Lucie (1990) “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.,” 38 Buffalo Law Rev. 1–58.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia J. (1991) The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Paul (1977) Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1988), “Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 409–48.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1993) Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, Jock (1999a) The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, Jock (1999b) “Cannibalism and Bulimia: Patterns of Social Control in Late Modernity,” 3 Theoretical Criminology 387–407.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Brown v. Board of Education (I), 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education (II), 349 U.S. 294 (1955).Google Scholar
Cassazione Penale (1999). Codice Penale, 1047:2204–11.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Koon, 34 F.3d 1416 (1994).Google Scholar