Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hazama, Yasushi
2012.
Hegemonic preservation or horizontal accountability: constitutional review in Turkey.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 4,
p.
421.
Ingram, Matthew C.
2012.
'Networked Justice: Judges, the Diffusion of Ideas, and Legal Reform Movements in Mexico'.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Ribičič, Ciril
2013.
O presežkih Revusovega desetletja.
Revus,
p.
720.
Brett, Peter
2014.
Explaining South Africa's Bill of Rights: an interpretive approach.
Commonwealth & Comparative Politics,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 3,
p.
423.
Brinks, Daniel M.
and
Forbath, William
2014.
Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries.
p.
221.
Desposato, Scott W.
Ingram, Matthew C.
and
Lannes, Osmar P.
2015.
Power, Composition, and Decision Making: The Behavioral Consequences of Institutional Reform on Brazil’sSupremo Tribunal Federal.
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
534.
JARAMILLO RUIZ, FELIPE
and
ERAZO, ANA C.
2016.
Gender Equality as a General Interest of a Pluralistic Society: An Analysis of Constitutional Precedent in Colombia.
Bulletin of Latin American Research,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
178.
INGRAM, MATTHEW C.
2016.
Networked Justice: Judges, the Diffusion of Ideas, and Legal Reform Movements in Mexico.
Journal of Latin American Studies,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 4,
p.
739.
Aguiar-Aguilar, Azul A.
2016.
Harmonizing national law with inter-American human rights law: Evidence from Mexico.
Journal of Human Rights,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 4,
p.
477.
Dressel, Björn
Sanchez-Urribarri, Raul
and
Stroh, Alexander
2017.
The Informal Dimension of Judicial Politics: A Relational Perspective.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
413.
Dixon, Rosalind
2017.
Constitutional Design Two Ways: Constitutional Drafters as Judges.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Dressel, Björn
Sanchez-Urribarri, Raul
and
Stroh, Alexander
2018.
Courts and informal networks: Towards a relational perspective on judicial politics outside Western democracies.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 5,
p.
573.
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel
2018.
Communicative Entrepreneurs: The Case of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Dialogue with National Judges.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 4,
p.
737.
Hawkins, Benjamin
and
Alvarez Rosete, Arturo
2019.
Judicialization and Health Policy in Colombia: The Implications for Evidence‐Informed Policymaking.
Policy Studies Journal,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4,
p.
953.
Botero, Sandra
2020.
Confianza, apoyo a la democracia y corrupción: una mirada a la Corte Constitucional en la opinión pública colombiana.
Latin American Law Review,
p.
25.
Tiede, Lydia Brashear
2020.
Mixed Judicial Selection and Constitutional Review.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 7,
p.
1092.
Cortez Salinas, Josafat
2020.
¿Qué es la Decisión Judicial? Notas sobre los estudios judiciales en América Latina.
Latin American Law Review,
p.
129.
Gonzalez Ocantos, Ezequiel
and
Sandholtz, Wayne
2021.
International Human Rights Courts and Sources of Resilience: The Case of the Inter-American System.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Lehoucq, Emilio
2021.
Legal Threats and the Emergence of Legal Mobilization: Conservative Mobilization in Colombia.
Law & Social Inquiry,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 2,
p.
299.
Klatt, Matthias
2021.
Proportionality, Balancing, and Rights.
Vol. 136,
Issue. ,
p.
163.