Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T09:35:45.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2015

Naoko Taguchi
Naoko Taguchi*
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper brings together the research and developments of instructed pragmatics over the past three decades by reporting the synthesis findings of instructional intervention studies in interlanguage pragmatics. Two questions have guided this investigation: (1) is instruction effective in learning pragmatics?; and (2) what methods are most effective in learning pragmatics? Exhaustive electronic bibliographical searches yielded a body of 58 instructional intervention studies for the review. Findings across these studies are compared and explored for common patterns and inconsistencies that emerge among them. The paper concludes with implications for future research based on the survey of the existing practice.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 1 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System 33, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks. In Mayo, García (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 221–241.Google Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2013). Teachability and bilingual effects on third language knowledge of refusals. Intercultural Pragmatics 9, 511–541.Google Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. & Guzman-Pitarch, J. (2013). The effect of instruction on learners’ use and negotiation of refusals. In Martí-Arnándiz, O. & Salazar-Campillo, P. (eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond. Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi, 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. A. & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008) Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 63 (Suppl. 1), 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Teaching pragmatics. Washington DC: Office of English Programs, U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A. & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review 62, 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In Kasper, G. & Blum-Kulka, S. (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, L. (1994). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicatures in American English be improved through explicit instruction? In Bouton, L. & Kachru, Y. (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph Series 5. Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 88–109.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In Candlin, C. & Murphy, D. (eds.), Language learning tasks. London: Prentice Hall, 5–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics 2–3, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching 41, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. & Ishihara, N. (2013). Pragmatics. In Tomlinson, B. (ed.), Applied linguistics and materials development. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 113–126.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. & Tarone, E. (1994). The effects of training on written speech act behavior: Stating and changing an opinion. Minnesota TESOL Journal 12, 39–62.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. & Vyatkina, N. (2012). Telecollaboration for professional purposes: Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review 68, 422–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, A. J. B. (2003). The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: Teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies 22, 55–106.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 94–113.Google Scholar
Di Pietro, R. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. & Collins, L. (2009). Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 93, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 4, 227–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System 33, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. (2005). Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine? Intercultural Pragmatics 2, 453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence of non-native English-speaking teacher candidates (NNESTCs) in an EFL context. In Alcón-Soler, E. & Martínez-Flor, A. (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. & Liu, C. N. (2013). Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. Iranian Journal of Society, Culture, and Language, 52–73.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A. & Fatahi, A. (2004). The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL EJ 8 (2) A2, 1–12.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16, 49–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, K. (2014). The differential effects of explicit and Implicit Instruction on EFL Learners’ Use of Epistemic Stance. Applied Linguistics 35, 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuya, Y. & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatics instruction. Foreign Language Annuals 41, 478–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuya, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies 21, 1–47.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. & Marquez-Reiter, R. (2003). Task difficulty in speaking tests. Language Testing 20, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghobadi, A. & Fahim, M. (2009). The effect of explicit teaching of English ‘Thanking formulas’ on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System 37, 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N. & Jones, C. (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System 39, 240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. & Brown, D. (1987). Teachers and students learning about compliments. TESOL Quarterly 21, 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, N. & Tatsuki, D. (2011). Pragmatics from research to practice: New directions. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, K. (2007). Developing understanding of how the desu/masu and plain forms express one's stance. In Yoshimi, D. R. & Wang, H. (eds.), Selected papers from the conference on pragmatics in the CJK classroom: The state of the art. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 181–202.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Iwai, T. (2013). Using n desu in small talk: JFL learners’ pragmatic development. In Kondo-Brown, K., Saito-Abbott, Y., Satsutani, S., Tsutsui, M. & Wehmeyer, A. (eds.), New perspectives on Japanese language learning, linguistics, and culture. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center, 27–47.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H. & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In John, N. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 165–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. & deHaan, J. (2013). Strategic Interaction 2.0: Instructed intercultural pragmatics in an EFL context. International Journal of Strategies Information Technology and Application 4, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakegawa, T. (2009). Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. (ed.) (1995). Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Pragmatics in language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 317–328.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Rose, K. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 627–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koike, D. A. & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System 33, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, S. (2008). Effects on pragmatic development through awareness-raising instruction: Refusals by Japanese EFL learners. In Alcón-Soler, E. & Martínez-Flor, A. (eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, M. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicatures to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9, 35–67.Google Scholar
Li, Q. (2012). Effects of instruction on adolescent beginners’ acquisition of request modification. TESOL Quarterly 46, 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2012). The effect of input-based practice on pragmatic development in L2 Chinese. Language Learning 62, 403–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2013). Amount of practice and pragmatic development of request-making in L2 Chinese. In Taguchi, N. & Sykes, J. M. (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. (2011). Sociolinguistic variation in speech of learners of Chinese as a second language. Language Learning 60, 366–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, A. & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Louw, K. J., Derwing, T. M. & Abbott, M. L. (2010). Teaching pragmatics to L2 learners for the workplace: The job interview. The Canadian Modern Language Review 66, 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez-Reiter, R. & Placencia, M. E. (eds.) (2004). Current trends in the pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. & Alcón-Soler, E. (2005). Special issue: Pragmatics in instructed language learning. System 33.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. & Usó-Juan, E. (2006). A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning 16, 39–64.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. (2006). The effectiveness of explicit and implicit treatments on EFL learners’ confidence in recognizing appropriate suggestions. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., Félix-Brasdefer, C. & Omar, A. S. (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 11. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 199–225.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. (2008). The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In Alcón-Soler, E. (ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language learning context. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang, 191–225.Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, A. & Fukuya, Y. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33, 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Narita, R. (2012). The effects of pragmatic consciousness-raising activity on the development of pragmatic awareness and use of hearsay evidential markers for learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2013). Instructional effects on the acquisition of modifers in constructive criticisms by EFL learners. Language Awareness 22, 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T., Pham, T. H. & Pham, M. H. (2012). The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 416–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, L. (2006). Patterns of development in Spanish L2 pragmatic acquisition: An analysis of novice learners’ production of directives. The Modern Language Journal 90, 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddiford, N. & Joe, A. (2010). Tracking the development of sociopragmatic skills. TESOL Quarterly 44, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C. (2009). Teaching and testing pragmatics. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (eds.), Handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roever, C. & Nguyen, T. H. (2013). Pragmatics of Vietnamese as native and target language. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. & Kasper, G. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. R. & Ng, K. F. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safont, M. P. (2004). An analysis of EAP learners’ pragmatic production: A focus on request forms. Ibérica 8, 23–39.Google Scholar
Sardegna, V. G. & Molle, D. (2010). Videoconferencing with strangers: Teaching Japanese EFL students verbal backchannel signals and reactive expressions. Intercultural Pragmatics 7–2, 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In Kasper, G. & Blum-Kulka, S. (eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 43–57.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2010). From the virtual world to the real world: A model of pragmatics instruction for study abroad. Foreign Language Annals 45, 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 1818–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simin, S., Eslami, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A. & Ketabi, S. (2014). The effects of explicit teaching of apologies on Persian EFL learners’ performance: When e-communication helps. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3, 71–84.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 36, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review 50, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. Applied Linguistics 16, 370–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of learning. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. (2009). Learner request in Spanish: Examining the potential of multiuser virtual environments for L2 pragmatics acquisition. In Lomika, L. & Lord, G. (eds.),The second generation: Online collaboration and social networking in CALL, 2009 CALICO Monograph. San Marcos: TX, 199–234.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. (2013). Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Taguchi, Spanish. In N. & Sykes, J. (eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Dancing with words: Strategies for learning pragmatics in Spanish. Retrieved 27 December 2011, from Regents of the University of Minnesota: www.carla.umn.edu/speechacts/sp_pragmatics/home.htmlGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics 28, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (ed.) (2009). Pragmatic competence in Japanese as a second language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2010). Longitudinal studies in interlanguage pragmatics. In Trosborg, A. (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics vol.7: Pragmatics across languages and cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. & Sykes, J. M. (eds.) (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 177–199.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2005). Noticing in task performance and learning outcomes: A qualitative analysis of instructional effects in interlanguage pragmatics. System 33, 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2010a). Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In Trosborg, A. (ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (vol.7). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391–421.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2010b). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In Martínez-Flor, A. & Usó-Juan, E. (eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research 10, 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2007). The effects of referential oriented activity in the structured input task on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 13, 46–60.Google Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics 30, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2012a). Assessing the effects of identical task repetition and task type repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language request downgraders. Intercultural Pragmatics 9, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2012b). Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 44, 1240–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. H. & Farashaiyan, A. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching formulaic politeness strategies in making request to undergraduates in an ESL classroom. Asian Social Science 8, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tateyama, Y. (2007). The effects of instruction on pragmatic awareness. In Bradford-Watts, K. (ed.), JALT 2006 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT, 1189–1200. Available online at http://jalt-publications.org/archive/proceedings/2006/E128.pdf.Google Scholar
Tateyama, Y. (2009). Requesting in Japanese: The effect of instruction on JFL learners’ pragmatic competence. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. (2002). Teaching gambits: The effect of instruction and task variation on the use of conversation strategies by intermediate Spanish students. Foreign Language Annals 35, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usó-Juan, E. (2013). Effects of metapragmatic instruction on EFL learners’ production of refusals. In Martí-Arnándiz, O. & Salazar-Campillo, P. (eds.), Refusals in instructional contexts and beyond. Amsterdam/New York, NY: Rodopi, 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utashiro, T. & Kawai, G. (2009). Blended learning for Japanese reactive tokens: Effects of computer-led, instructor-led, and peer-based instruction. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), Pragmatic competence. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 3267–3283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2012). Input processing. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Routledge handbook of SLA. NY: Routledge, 268–281.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, D. & Willis, J. (eds.) (2007). Doing task-based teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winke, P. & Teng, C. (2010). Using task-based pragmatics tutorials while studying abroad in China. Intercultural Pragmatics 7–2, 363–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies 19, 127–157. www.hawaii.edu/sls/sls/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Wishnoff.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learners’ use of interactional discourse makers. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar