Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T02:54:06.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Form-Focussed Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review of Classroom and Laboratory Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Nina Spada
Nina Spada
Affiliation:
McGill University, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 73 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In Schmidt, (ed.) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning, 259–302.Google Scholar
Allen, P.Swain, M.Harley, B. & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Toward a more comprehensive view of second language education. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. and Swain, M. (eds.), The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allwright, R. (1975). Problems in the study of the language teacher's treatment of learner error. In Burt, M. & Dulay, H. (eds.), New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education: ONTESOL '75. 96–109.Google Scholar
Allwright, D. (1988). Observation in the language classroom. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bailey, N.Madden, C. & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a 'natural' sequence in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 21, 2, 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, M. & Eubank, L. (1991). Acquisition theory and experimental design: a critique of Tomasello and Herron. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 1, 73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology language teaching: the roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases for communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 3, 357–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chastain, K. (1969). The audiolingual habit theory versus cognitive code-learning theory: some theoretical considerations. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 1, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. Hong Kong: Longman.Google Scholar
Day, E. & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches in language teaching in French immersion: an experimental study. Language Learning, 41, 1, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, R. (1994). How implicit can adult second language learning be? AILA Review, 11, 83–96.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, R. (1995). Learning L2 grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 3, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. and Appel, G. (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33–56.Google Scholar
Donato, R. & Lantolf, J. (1990). Dialogic origins of L2 monitoring. In Bouton, L.F. & Kachru, Y. (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, 83–97.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 4, 431–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (in press). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.) (to appear). Focus on form in classroom SLA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 2, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F, Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause construction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: interactions of explicit and implicit knowlege. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 3, 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (1994a) (ed). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (1994b). Consciousness in second language learning: psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquistion. In Hulstijn, J. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), AILA Review, 11, 37–56.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (1995). Consciousness in second language acquisition: a review of field studies and laboratory experiments. Language Awareness, 4, 3, 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 5, 583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, S. (1981). The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 1, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 2, 323–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotos, , & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: a task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 2, 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W. (eds.), ON TESOL '81, 129–39.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1990). Second and foreign language learning: same, different or none of the above? In. Vanpatten, B. & Lee, J. (eds.), Second language acquisition: foreign language learning, 34–44.Google Scholar
Gass, S. & Varonis, T. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 3, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Green, J. & Harker, J. (eds.) (1988). Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Green, P. & Hecht, H. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: an empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 2, 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: a classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 3, 331–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. (1994). Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom. AILA Review, 11, 57–68.Google Scholar
Harley, B. & Swain, M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In Davies, A., Griper, C. & Howatt, A. (eds.), Interlanguage, 291–311.Google Scholar
Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. & Swain, M. (1990). The development of bilingual proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howatt, A.P.R. (1984). A History of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, Y. & De Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? a research proposal. In Hulstijn, J. & Schmidt, R. (eds.) AILA Review, 11, 97–112.Google Scholar
Jarvis, G. A. (1968). A behavioural observation system for classroom foreign language skill acquisition activities. Modern Language Journal, 52, 335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 1, 63–100.Google Scholar
Kowal, M. & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 2, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquistion. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. & Terrell, S. (1983). The natural approach: language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. (1983). Exploring relations between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In Seliger, H. & Long, M.H. (eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition, 217–43.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. (1991) What have we here? Some observations on the role of instruction in second language acquistion. In Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., Sharwood-Smith, M., & Swain, M. (eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: a commemorative volume for Clans Faerch, 197–212.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. (in press). The importance of timing in focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 4, 429–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. & Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 3, 563–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. & Spada, N. (1997). Learning English as a second language in a special school in Quebec. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 2, 315–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, W.T. (1981). Communicative language teaching: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.H. (1977). Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In Brown, H. D., Yorio, C.A. & Crymes, R. (eds.), ON TESOL 77, 278–93.Google Scholar
Long, M.H. (1980). Inside the “black box”: methodological issues in classroom research on language learning. Language Learning, 30, 1, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? TESOL Quarterly, 17, 3, 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1984). Process and product in ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 3, 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In Debot, K., Ginsberg, R. & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W.C. & Bhatia, T.K. (eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: second language acquisition, 413–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H., Inagaki, S. & Ortega, L. (to appear). The role of implicit negative evidence in SLA: models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
Long, M.H. & Robinson, P. (in press). Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA.Google Scholar
Loschky, L. & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.), Tasks and language learning: integrating theory andpratice, 123–67.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1987). Speaking immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 43, 4, 701–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1994a). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 3, 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1994b). La negotiation de la forme: Strategic analytique en classe d'immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 3, 446–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (1995). Negotiation of form in communicatively oriented classrooms. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Long Beach, CA, March, 1995.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (in press). Recasts, repetition, and reinforcement: Ambiguity in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (to appear). Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses and red herrings? Tlie Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 2, 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1985). Process research in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 18, 4, 330–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, C. & Eisenstein, M. (1985). Reality revisited: an experimental communicative course in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 2, 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, H. (1971). Interaction analysis – a new modern language for supervisors. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 2, 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V. (in progress). Learning inflectional morphology: the relationship between inflectional forms and implicit/explicit learning. PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Newmark, L. & Riebel, D.A. (1968). Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6, 2, 228–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 17, 4, 459–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 1, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 2, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In Hyltenstam, K. & Pienemann, M. (eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, 23–75.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. & Brindley, J. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 2, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranta, L. (in progress). Focus on form from the inside: The relationship between grammatical sensitivity and L2 acquisition in communicative ESL programs. PhD dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1, 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenshine, B. & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In Travers, R. (ed.), Second Handbook of research on teaching.Google Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rutherford, B. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousnessraising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6, 3, 274–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savignon, S. (1972). Communicative competence: an experiment in foreign-language teaching. Philadelphia: Centre for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Scherer, G. & Wertheimer, F. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign-language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995) (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. (Technical report #9), Hawaii, University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (ed.), Talking to Learn, 237–326.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1979). The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature. In Andersen, R. (ed.), The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages, 3–32.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behaviour. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds. Second Language Research, 7, 2, 118–32.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993) Input enhancement in instructed SLA: theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 2, 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.D. (1969). The Pennsylvania foreign language research project: teaching proficiency and class achievement in two modern languages. Foreign Language Annals, 3, 2, 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. (1987). Relationships between instructional differences and learning outcomes: a process-product study of communicative language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 8, 2, 137–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. (1990s). Observing classroom behaviours and learning outcomes in different second language programs. In Richards, J. & Nunan, D., (eds.), Second language teacher education, 293–310.Google Scholar
Spada, N. (1990b). A look at the research process in classroom observation: a case study. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom, ELT Documents: 133, 81–93.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Fröhlich, M. (1995). Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme (COLT): coding conventions and applications. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. (1989). Intensive ESL programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 1, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. (1997). A Question of Timely Enhancement. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Orlando, Florida, March 1997.Google Scholar
Stern, H.H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (eds.), The development of bilingual proficiency, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H.H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 1, 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: a Canadian case study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 3, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: the garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 11, 4, 385–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquistion: some long term effects. Second Language Research, 12, 2, 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M. & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1988). Tlie classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Vanpatten, B. (1988). How juries get hung: problems with the evidence for a focus on form in teaching. Language Learning, 38, 2, 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 3, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 4, 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: terms, linguistic features and research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27–36.Google Scholar
Vanpatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993a). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 2, 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993b). Input processing and second language acquisition: a role for instruction. Tlie Modem Language Journal, 77, 1, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In Eckman, F., Highland, D., Lee, P., Mileham, J., & Weber, R. (eds.), Second Language Acquisition and Pedagogy, 169–85.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In Diller, K.C. (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, 119–54.Google Scholar
White, J. (1996). An input enhancement study with ESL children: Effects on the acquisition of possessive determiners. Unpublished PhD thesis. McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
White, J. (in press). Getting the learners attention: a typographical input enhancement study. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA.Google Scholar
White, L. (1985). Is there a “logical problem” of second language acquisition? TESL Canada Journal, 2, 2, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 2, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 2, 133–61.Google Scholar
White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P.M. & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 4, 416–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1976). Developmental sequences in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Working Papers in Bilingiialism, 11, 1–13.Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1985). Grammars in search of input and intake. In Gass, S. and Madden, C. (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 329–44.Google Scholar